全球投资治理下的国际投资协定多边谈判与中国对策

发布时间：2018-10-31 08:27

【摘要】：国际投资的双向流动缓释了资本输出国和输入国之间的矛盾,美欧投资制度的趋同及对发展中国家的持续影响减少了国际投资制度分歧,为国际投资协定多边谈判提供了驱动力,但南北国家投资保护理念仍有差异,加之国际社会逆全球化思潮兴起,导致多边投资协定谈判面临诸多障碍。基于对主要资本输出国和输入国国际投资协定的文本分析可见,未来国际投资协定多边谈判的焦点主要集中于投资准入、投资竞争、投资争议等条款。为减少谈判障碍,化解制度分歧,中国在推动多边投资协定谈判时,应选择能兼顾南北国家利益的谈判路径,以"共同发展"为导向,提供有助于提升发展中国家对外投资能力、可以兼容南北国家不同发展模式和发展阶段并能灵活应对南北国家制度分歧的谈判文本。
[Abstract]:The two-way flow of international investment has eased the contradiction between the capital exporting countries and the importing countries, and the convergence of the investment regimes of the United States and Europe and their continued impact on developing countries have reduced the differences in the international investment system. It provides a driving force for multilateral negotiation of international investment agreements, but there are still differences in the concept of investment protection in the north and south countries, together with the rise of the trend of anti-globalization in the international community, which leads to many obstacles to the negotiation of multilateral investment agreements. Based on the text analysis of the international investment agreements of the major capital exporting countries and the importing countries, it can be seen that the multilateral negotiation of the future international investment agreements mainly focuses on the terms of investment access, investment competition, investment disputes, and so on. In order to reduce the obstacles to negotiations and resolve institutional differences, China should choose a negotiation path that takes into account the interests of the North and the South when promoting negotiations on multilateral investment agreements, and should be guided by "common development". To provide negotiating texts that will help to enhance the capacity of developing countries to invest abroad, be compatible with the different development models and stages of development of the North and South countries, and be flexible in coping with the differences in the national systems of the North and the South.
【作者单位】：广东外语外贸大学广东国际战略研究院暨21世纪海上丝绸之路协同创新中心;广东外语外贸大学金融学院;广东外语外贸大学商务英语学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目“提高中国在全球经济治理中的制度性话语权研究”(项目号:15ZDC038)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D996.4

【相似文献】