论国际私法中的公共秩序保留制度
发布时间：2018-11-04 17:54
【摘要】：传统理论和现有的研究指出,公共秩序保留制度对于一些国外法律的限制连带着维护的程度还有针对于法院所提出的“公共秩序”具有很大的作用。对于国际私法而言,某些法律制度相对比较落后,没有新意。国际私法中的公共秩序保留制度在调和不同的国际私法关系发挥着十分突出的作用。但是在长时间的历史演化过程中,有关公共秩序保留制度的研究仍然存在一定的误解,即使这些理论都可以利用法律规则来解释,但是也的确造成一定程度的概念混乱和学术研究价值不高。从根本上说,这些研究很长时间没有得到理念上的更新,而且还影响人们对于国际私法的认识,由此,系统的发展维护公共秩序保留制度的目的便更清晰。这个制度是有一定意义的,因为这个制度对于国际私法的发展还是有很大的影响。由于这种机制的存在,拒绝外国法律适用的法律亦可以理解是“法律”,以减少国家之间不必要的争端和冲突。本文第一部分介绍了公共秩序的基本定义、功能和意义三个方面。对公共秩序的定义的研究,应该是动态和静态两方面的。动态的观点是:对于公共秩序保留制度(一种基本的制度和体系)而言,国际私法可用于外国法律制度;静态的观点是:要从一个社会或国家的利益和基本的预算制度的作用来看。本课题第二部分基于公共秩序保留制度,简要关键的回忆了有关社会道德和责任的法律理论知识。比如,存在于公共秩序里的有关道德的衡量的概念,积极和消极的作用;维护好公安机关的权力,剥夺外国法律的治权;以及治外法权。在第三大块中详细的介绍了有关国家立法的内容,并且解释了有关公共秩序保留制度中不同体系国家的立法问题。本课题第四块通过司法实践明显的表现出有关中国的公共秩序保留制度的一系列问题,系统分析中国的公共秩序保留制度在当今国际化的安全形势。针对存在的问题,本课题提出相应立法和司法实践的解决办法,尽我们最大的努力不断地促进国际私法中有关公共秩序保留制度的蜕变。长期以来,对公共秩序的相关研究仍然是法律现象本身的一个矛盾点。外国法律的机制和应用将不被视为“合法的”,以减少争端和许多国家之间的不必要的冲突,从而更大限度的促进世界和平的发展。
[Abstract]:The traditional theory and existing research point out that the system of public order reservation has great effect on the restriction of some foreign laws and the degree of maintenance, as well as the "public order" put forward by the court. For private international law, some legal systems are relatively backward and have no new ideas. The system of public order reservation in private international law plays a prominent role in reconciling different private international law relations. However, in the long history of evolution, there are still some misunderstandings about the system of public order reservation, even though these theories can be explained by legal rules. But it does cause a certain degree of conceptual confusion and academic research value is not high. Fundamentally, these studies have not been updated in concept for a long time, and also affect people's understanding of private international law, thus, the purpose of systematic development and maintenance of public order reservation system is clearer. This system is meaningful because it still has a great influence on the development of private international law. As a result of the existence of such a mechanism, the law denying the application of foreign law can also be understood as "law" in order to reduce unnecessary disputes and conflicts between States. The first part introduces the basic definition, function and significance of public order. The research on the definition of public order should be dynamic and static. The dynamic view is that private international law can be used in foreign legal systems for the reservation of public order (a basic system and system); The static view is to look at the interests of a society or nation and the role of a basic budget system. The second part of this thesis is based on the public order reservation system, briefly and critically recalls the legal theory knowledge about social morality and responsibility. For example, the concept of moral measurement, which exists in public order, plays a positive and negative role; maintains the power of public security organs and deprives foreign laws of their jurisdiction; and extraterritorial jurisdiction. In the third part, it introduces the content of national legislation in detail, and explains the legislation of different systems in the system of public order reservation. The fourth part of this paper shows a series of problems about China's public order reservation system through judicial practice, and systematically analyzes the international security situation of China's public order reservation system. In view of the existing problems, this paper puts forward the corresponding legislative and judicial practice solutions, and does our best to promote the transformation of the reservation system of public order in private international law. For a long time, the research on public order is still a contradiction of the legal phenomenon itself. The mechanisms and applications of foreign laws will not be considered "legitimate" in order to reduce disputes and unnecessary conflicts between many countries, thereby further promoting the peaceful development of the world.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D997
本文编号：2310688
[Abstract]:The traditional theory and existing research point out that the system of public order reservation has great effect on the restriction of some foreign laws and the degree of maintenance, as well as the "public order" put forward by the court. For private international law, some legal systems are relatively backward and have no new ideas. The system of public order reservation in private international law plays a prominent role in reconciling different private international law relations. However, in the long history of evolution, there are still some misunderstandings about the system of public order reservation, even though these theories can be explained by legal rules. But it does cause a certain degree of conceptual confusion and academic research value is not high. Fundamentally, these studies have not been updated in concept for a long time, and also affect people's understanding of private international law, thus, the purpose of systematic development and maintenance of public order reservation system is clearer. This system is meaningful because it still has a great influence on the development of private international law. As a result of the existence of such a mechanism, the law denying the application of foreign law can also be understood as "law" in order to reduce unnecessary disputes and conflicts between States. The first part introduces the basic definition, function and significance of public order. The research on the definition of public order should be dynamic and static. The dynamic view is that private international law can be used in foreign legal systems for the reservation of public order (a basic system and system); The static view is to look at the interests of a society or nation and the role of a basic budget system. The second part of this thesis is based on the public order reservation system, briefly and critically recalls the legal theory knowledge about social morality and responsibility. For example, the concept of moral measurement, which exists in public order, plays a positive and negative role; maintains the power of public security organs and deprives foreign laws of their jurisdiction; and extraterritorial jurisdiction. In the third part, it introduces the content of national legislation in detail, and explains the legislation of different systems in the system of public order reservation. The fourth part of this paper shows a series of problems about China's public order reservation system through judicial practice, and systematically analyzes the international security situation of China's public order reservation system. In view of the existing problems, this paper puts forward the corresponding legislative and judicial practice solutions, and does our best to promote the transformation of the reservation system of public order in private international law. For a long time, the research on public order is still a contradiction of the legal phenomenon itself. The mechanisms and applications of foreign laws will not be considered "legitimate" in order to reduce disputes and unnecessary conflicts between many countries, thereby further promoting the peaceful development of the world.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D997
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张婧yN;;我国公共秩序保留制度的立法分析及完善建议[J];法制与社会;2017年04期
2 齐凯悦;;公共秩序保留制度在我国涉外法律适用中的界定[J];法制与社会;2013年35期
3 马为;;浅析公共秩序保留[J];商;2013年15期
4 刘丛;;浅析公共秩序保留制度在我国的适用[J];经营管理者;2012年22期
5 曾加;吕东锋;;论港澳台地区公共秩序保留制度的适用及其对我国大陆的启示[J];河南财经政法大学学报;2012年06期
6 侯微微;;简析我国关于公共秩序保留制度的立法[J];东方企业文化;2012年19期
7 刘儒雅;;浅谈公共秩序保留在司法实践中的一些问题[J];法制与经济(下旬);2012年09期
8 唐征玲;;论我国公共秩序保留制度的立法缺陷及其完善[J];法制与经济(中旬刊);2009年07期
9 李金忠;;公共秩序保留制度在我国运用的回顾与前瞻[J];法制与社会;2009年02期
10 张晓婷;;从公共秩序保留制度简论国际公共秩序与国内公共秩序之区分——兼谈相关公共秩序保留制度立法建议[J];法制与社会;2008年23期
，本文编号：2310688
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2310688.html
