商事仲裁规则适用性法律问题研究
发布时间：2018-11-08 10:42
【摘要】：商事仲裁规则适用性问题是一个长期被仲裁学界忽视的涉及仲裁规则的重大问题。临时仲裁应选择适用诸如UNCITRAL仲裁规则等成熟而规范的既存仲裁规则;当事人选择仲裁机构应视为原则上同意适用仲裁机构仲裁规则,但当事人对机构仲裁规则具有适当修改权;在仲裁机构没有作相反规定的前提下,临时仲裁规则亦可适用于机构仲裁中;仲裁规则的适用本来与仲裁协议效力的认定并无关系,但因我国将对仲裁机构的约定作为仲裁协议生效要件之一,因而当事人选择适用仲裁机构仲裁规则并不意味着仲裁协议有效,可通过仲裁机构仲裁规则推定当事人同意仲裁机构对案件具有管辖权,从而肯定此类仲裁协议的效力。
[Abstract]:The applicability of commercial arbitration rules is a major issue concerning arbitration rules which has long been neglected by arbitration scholars. The provisional arbitration should choose the existing arbitration rules, such as the UNCITRAL arbitration rules, and the parties choosing the arbitration institution should be regarded as agreeing in principle to the application of the arbitration rules of the arbitration institution, but the parties have the right to modify the institutional arbitration rules appropriately. If the arbitration institution does not make any provision to the contrary, the provisional arbitration rules may also be applied to institutional arbitration; The application of arbitration rules had nothing to do with the determination of the validity of the arbitration agreement, but the agreement of the arbitration institution was taken as one of the effective elements of the arbitration agreement in our country. Therefore, the parties' choice to apply arbitration rules does not mean that the arbitration agreement is valid. The arbitration rules of arbitration institution can be used to presume that the parties agree that the arbitration institution has jurisdiction over the case, thus confirming the validity of such arbitration agreement.
【作者单位】： 南方医科大学人文与管理学院;
【基金】：广东省哲学社会科学“十一五”规划2010年度后期资助项目(GD10HFX02)
【分类号】：D997.4;D925.7
本文编号：2318222
[Abstract]:The applicability of commercial arbitration rules is a major issue concerning arbitration rules which has long been neglected by arbitration scholars. The provisional arbitration should choose the existing arbitration rules, such as the UNCITRAL arbitration rules, and the parties choosing the arbitration institution should be regarded as agreeing in principle to the application of the arbitration rules of the arbitration institution, but the parties have the right to modify the institutional arbitration rules appropriately. If the arbitration institution does not make any provision to the contrary, the provisional arbitration rules may also be applied to institutional arbitration; The application of arbitration rules had nothing to do with the determination of the validity of the arbitration agreement, but the agreement of the arbitration institution was taken as one of the effective elements of the arbitration agreement in our country. Therefore, the parties' choice to apply arbitration rules does not mean that the arbitration agreement is valid. The arbitration rules of arbitration institution can be used to presume that the parties agree that the arbitration institution has jurisdiction over the case, thus confirming the validity of such arbitration agreement.
【作者单位】： 南方医科大学人文与管理学院;
【基金】：广东省哲学社会科学“十一五”规划2010年度后期资助项目(GD10HFX02)
【分类号】：D997.4;D925.7
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 赵秀文;;论仲裁规则的适用与国际商事仲裁协议有效性的认定[J];北京仲裁;2006年04期
【二级参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 赵秀文;论法律意义上的仲裁地点及其确定[J];时代法学;2005年01期
，本文编号：2318222
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2318222.html
