国际投资争端中最惠国待遇适用扩大化问题研究
发布时间：2018-11-16 14:51
【摘要】：国际投资领域,最惠国待遇概括来说是指东道国对外国投资者实行的待遇不低于其已经给予或将给予第三国投资者的待遇。目前有效的投资条约,对最惠国待遇标准能否扩张适用于投资争端解决的程序事项未作明确规定,因此对此问题无论在理论上还是司法实践中均存在困境和争议。 本文运用分析和比较的方法,主要从理论、实践方面,对最惠国待遇扩大适用对争端解决程序的影响和我国可以采取的防范措施等问题进行了探讨。 文章一共分为四个部分:第一部分从理论方面对一般意义及国际投资领域中的最惠国待遇的基本含义、适用范围等进行了分析,回顾了最惠国待遇原则的起源,以典型案例“Maffezini v. Spain”案为主要切入点,讨论最惠国待遇扩张适用于投资争端解决程序的问题产生过程及随之而来的理论上的模糊和争议,对最惠国待遇扩大适用加以界定;第二部分从ICSID的仲裁实践入手,对支持和反对最惠国待遇扩大适用的观点和理由进行归纳,并对争议的一些焦点问题比如条约的解释方法、对优惠的认定等进行了探讨;第三部分以现有的投资条约中的程序事项的规定为基础,分析了最惠国待遇扩大适用对争端解决程序适用的影响;第四部分立足我国缔约实践,提出采取防范措施的建议,包括在立法中明确我国的立场,根据缔约国家的不同情况采用不同的规定,同时关注条约溯及力的问题,运用溯及力原则对最惠国待遇的扩大适用加以限制,提高自身参与国际争端解决的能力,以降低因条约规定不明给我国际投资活动带来的风险。
[Abstract]:In the field of international investment, MFN treatment generally refers to the treatment that the host country has given or will give to foreign investors. Whether the MFN standard can be extended to the settlement of investment disputes is not clearly stipulated in the current effective investment treaties, so there are difficulties and disputes in both theory and judicial practice. By means of analysis and comparison, this paper discusses the influence of the extended application of most-favoured-nation treatment on the dispute settlement procedure and the preventive measures that can be taken by our country from the aspects of theory and practice. The article is divided into four parts: the first part analyzes the general meaning and the basic meaning and application scope of MFN treatment in the field of international investment, and reviews the origin of MFN principle. Taking the typical case of "Maffezini v. Spain" as the main breakthrough point, this paper discusses the process of the expansion of MFN treatment in the process of investment dispute settlement and the theoretical ambiguity and controversy that follows, and defines the extended application of MFN treatment. The second part starts with the arbitration practice of ICSID, summarizes the viewpoints and reasons of supporting and opposing the application of MFN, and probes into some key issues in dispute, such as the interpretation method of treaties, the confirmation of preferential treatment and so on. The third part, based on the provisions of the existing investment treaties on procedural matters, analyzes the impact of the expanded application of MFN treatment on the application of dispute settlement procedures; The fourth part is based on the practice of contracting in our country, and puts forward some suggestions of taking preventive measures, including clarifying our country's position in legislation, adopting different provisions according to the different situations of the contracting countries, and paying attention to the retroactive effect of the treaty at the same time. The principle of retroactive effect is applied to restrict the application of MFN treatment and to improve its ability to participate in the settlement of international disputes so as to reduce the risks brought to our international investment by the unspecified provisions of treaties.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996.4
本文编号：2335818
[Abstract]:In the field of international investment, MFN treatment generally refers to the treatment that the host country has given or will give to foreign investors. Whether the MFN standard can be extended to the settlement of investment disputes is not clearly stipulated in the current effective investment treaties, so there are difficulties and disputes in both theory and judicial practice. By means of analysis and comparison, this paper discusses the influence of the extended application of most-favoured-nation treatment on the dispute settlement procedure and the preventive measures that can be taken by our country from the aspects of theory and practice. The article is divided into four parts: the first part analyzes the general meaning and the basic meaning and application scope of MFN treatment in the field of international investment, and reviews the origin of MFN principle. Taking the typical case of "Maffezini v. Spain" as the main breakthrough point, this paper discusses the process of the expansion of MFN treatment in the process of investment dispute settlement and the theoretical ambiguity and controversy that follows, and defines the extended application of MFN treatment. The second part starts with the arbitration practice of ICSID, summarizes the viewpoints and reasons of supporting and opposing the application of MFN, and probes into some key issues in dispute, such as the interpretation method of treaties, the confirmation of preferential treatment and so on. The third part, based on the provisions of the existing investment treaties on procedural matters, analyzes the impact of the expanded application of MFN treatment on the application of dispute settlement procedures; The fourth part is based on the practice of contracting in our country, and puts forward some suggestions of taking preventive measures, including clarifying our country's position in legislation, adopting different provisions according to the different situations of the contracting countries, and paying attention to the retroactive effect of the treaty at the same time. The principle of retroactive effect is applied to restrict the application of MFN treatment and to improve its ability to participate in the settlement of international disputes so as to reduce the risks brought to our international investment by the unspecified provisions of treaties.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 刘小吾;;解读公共政策[J];湖南社会科学;2009年04期
2 余劲松;外资的公平与公正待遇问题研究——由NAFTA的实践产生的几点思考[J];法商研究;2005年06期
3 徐崇利;;从实体到程序:最惠国待遇适用范围之争[J];法商研究;2007年02期
4 张振华;;国际投资协定中最惠国待遇条款的新发展与中国的应对之策[J];湖南财经高等专科学校学报;2008年06期
5 沈志韬;;论国际投资仲裁正当性危机[J];时代法学;2010年02期
6 刘用安;;立法技术:精无止境[J];人民政坛;2009年10期
7 张光;;论国际投资仲裁中非投资国际义务的适用进路[J];现代法学;2009年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 卢铄栋;最惠国条款适用于争端解决程序事项问题研究[D];厦门大学;2008年
2 刘远志;投资争端仲裁上诉机制研究[D];厦门大学;2008年
，本文编号：2335818
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2335818.html
