《鹿特丹规则》仲裁规定及其对我国的影响研究
[Abstract]:Chapter 15 of the United Nations Convention on contracts for the International Carriage of goods wholly or partly by Sea (the Rotterdam rules for short), Chapter 15, deals specifically with arbitration, which distinguishes between different modes of carriage, For the first time, the disputes related to liner shipping contract, volume contract and non-liner contract are stipulated separately. Compared with the previous conventions, the Rotterdam rules have breakthrough provisions in the scope of application and related specific provisions, and the degree of complexity has also increased. Although the Rotterdam rules have not come into effect and China is not a party to the Convention, as a new product of the development of international shipping, it will certainly have an impact on the international commercial arbitration system. Our country needs to analyze the trend of development reflected in the Rotterdam rules in order to prepare for the greatest protection of the interests of our country in international commercial arbitration. Finally, based on the national conditions of our country, we should analyze the influence on our country and the significance of reference. This paper is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, in which there are four chapters: the first chapter is the introduction of the arbitration provisions of the Convention. For the first time, the Convention provides for the content of international arbitration through different modes of transport. This chapter analyzes the general rules of liner arbitration and the exception of volume contract, the provisions of non-liner shipping, the arbitration agreement after the dispute arises, and the applicable conditions. The second chapter is the overall evaluation of the arbitration provisions of the Convention. Starting from the purpose of the arbitration provisions of the Rotterdam rules, understanding the original intention of the establishment of arbitration in the Rotterdam rules, starting with the establishment principle, understanding the starting point and central idea of the arbitration clause in the Rotterdam rules; Compared with the international arbitration law, the paper analyzes the form of arbitration and the incorporation of "specific reference" into the arbitration, and concludes the inheritance and development of the Rotterdam rules on these two issues; At the same time, the problems existing in the arbitration provisions in the Rotterdam rules are interpreted, mainly focusing on the problems caused by the selection and application of arbitration, the possible contradictions in many arbitration places and the difficulties in the practice of the applicable law. The third chapter studies the influence of the convention arbitration provisions on our country. This chapter mainly compares the conflicts and differences between the relevant provisions of arbitration in the Rotterdam rules and the laws of our country from the aspect of legislation, experiences the influence of the Rotterdam rules on the number of arbitration cases in our country from the field of maritime arbitration. And other implications for international shipping and trade. The fourth chapter analyzes the enlightenment that our country obtains from it. Mainly includes the related legislation revision proposal, the maritime arbitration proposal and the shipping trade enterprise enlightenment.
【学位授予单位】:大连海事大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D996.19
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 ;《国际班轮运输管理规定》[J];中国海商法年刊;1990年00期
2 徐步;张功;;欧盟第4056/86号条例废止的影响及建议[J];世界海运;2008年04期
3 张群濮;吕靖;;欧美《反垄断法》适用于班轮运输的沿革分析[J];中国水运;2012年11期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 陈燕;陈飞;;基于班轮运输货物多维属性的收益管理模型[A];第二届中国智能交通年会论文集[C];2006年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 朱婧;19家公司被注销国际班轮运输业务经营资格[N];中国水运报;2008年
2 张捷姝;合作 班轮运输的趋势[N];国际商报;2002年
3 谢宗惠;3家公司无船承运人经营资格被终止[N];中国水运报;2008年
4 李鹏;多种原因致航运经营资格被注销[N];国际商报;2008年
5 ;对话是提高班轮运输服务的关键[N];国际商报;2006年
6 远;班轮运输集中程度越来越高[N];国际商报;2002年
7 尹媚;班轮运输颓势可能蔓延[N];国际经贸消息;2002年
8 本报记者 杨光;天津广州两港开通杂货班轮运输[N];中国交通报;2010年
9 欧阳波;交通部将整治国际班轮运输市场[N];中国证券报;2007年
10 闻欣;交通部加强国际客运班轮运输管理[N];中国交通报;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 葛小涵;《鹿特丹规则》仲裁规定及其对我国的影响研究[D];大连海事大学;2017年
2 王欣;国际班轮运输协议管制法律问题研究[D];大连海事大学;2011年
3 黄勇;长江内河班轮运输航线优化设置[D];上海交通大学;2007年
4 史小宁;班轮运输战略联盟中的博弈[D];大连海事大学;2003年
5 祝毅然;基于成本效率的班轮运输网络优化研究[D];上海海事大学;2006年
6 陈舜;班轮运输企业资质信誉评估指标体系的研究[D];上海海事大学;2004年
7 吴浩;基于信息共享信任机制的班轮运输舱位分配策略研究[D];上海交通大学;2013年
8 王继来;俄罗斯入世对国际班轮运输市场的影响分析[D];上海交通大学;2013年
9 韩庆;五洲航运有限公司支线班轮运输服务水平提升的对策研究[D];大连海事大学;2008年
10 陈u&u&;班轮运输企业集装箱成本分摊研究[D];复旦大学;2009年
,本文编号:2353451
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2353451.html