福费廷无追索权问题研究

发布时间：2018-11-28 11:34

【摘要】：无追索权是福费廷业务的最大特点和优点。这在一定程度上也成为吸引出口商的最大亮点。本文对与福费廷无追索权有关的基本法律问题进行了论述。除引言和结语部分之外,全文共包括五章。第一章对福费廷无追索权进行了概述。首先界定了福费廷无追索权的相关定义,包括追索权和福费廷的概念。论述了无追索权和福费廷当事人权利义务的关系,当事人之间的权利义务内容是无追索权的基础。无追索权是当事人权利义务关系妥协的结果。第二章分析了福费廷无追索权的法律基础。法律基础的探讨是进行法律研究的出发点和归宿点。福费廷无追索权的法律基础是债权让与。福费廷无追索权中的债权让与传统民法中的债权让与不同,它以票据为债权表现形式,这使得福费廷业务导入了票据法的调整范围,也为福费廷业务的实质开展提供了便利与条件。第三章对福费廷无追索权的实现方式及相对性进行了论述。福费廷无追索权的实现方式包括票据背书转让和放弃追索的书面承诺两种方式。无追索权不是绝对的,出口商必须符合一定的先决条件。担保是福费廷无追索权实现的间接保证,保付签字、独立保函及备用信用证是福费廷中担保的主要方式。对于保付签字及独立担保的效力各国法律、国际公约及国际惯例有不同的规定。第四章对福费廷无追索权的法律适用问题进行了论述。福费廷涉及多方当事人和多种法律关系,其法律适用相对比较复杂。本文根据国际私法中当事人意思自治原则和最密切联系地原则对福费廷的法律适用进行了梳理。针对我国《票据法》中对于涉外票据法律适用的有关规定,宜采用“发行说”认定出票地。我国银行在实践中应根据具体情况选择对己方有益的法律适用条款。第五章论述了福费廷无追索权相关的法律问题,并提出了完善意见。对《合同法》、《票据法》相关条文提出了完善修改意见。我国没有独立担保的明确规定,根据各国的法律实际,我国应在司法实践中确立独立担保制度。分析了福费廷无追索权的相对性对我国银行福费廷业务规范的启示并提出了完善意见。
[Abstract]:No recourse is the greatest feature and advantage of Forfaiting business. To some extent, this has become the biggest attraction to exporters. This paper discusses the basic legal issues related to Forfaiting's non-recourse right. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the full text consists of five chapters. The first chapter summarizes Forfaiting's right of no recourse. Firstly, the author defines the relevant definition of Forfaiting's right of no recourse, including the concept of right of recourse and Forfaiting. The relationship between the right of no recourse and the rights and obligations of Forfaiting parties is discussed. The content of rights and obligations between the parties is the basis of the right of no recourse. The non-recourse right is the result of the compromise between the parties' rights and obligations. The second chapter analyzes the legal basis of Forfaiting's right of no recourse. The discussion of legal basis is the starting point and destination of legal research. The legal basis of Forfaiting's right of no recourse is the assignment of creditor's rights. The assignment of creditor's rights in Forfaiting's right of no recourse is different from that in traditional civil law. It takes bill as the form of expression of creditor's rights, which makes Forfaiting's business lead into the adjustment scope of instrument law. It also provides convenience and conditions for the substantive development of Forfaiting business. The third chapter discusses the realization and relativity of Forfaiting's non-recourse right. Forfaiting's realization of non-recourse includes two ways: transfer of bill endorsement and written commitment of waiver of recourse. Non-recourse is not absolute, exporters must meet certain prerequisites. The guarantee is the indirect guarantee of Forfaiting's realization without recourse. The main way of the guarantee in Forfaiting is the signature of guarantee, the independent guarantee and the standby letter of credit. National laws, international conventions and international practices have different provisions on the validity of warranty signatures and independent guarantees. Chapter four discusses the application of Forfaiting's non-recourse law. Forfaiting involves multiple parties and legal relationships, and its legal application is relatively complex. According to the principle of party autonomy in private international law and the principle of closest connection, this paper combs Forfaiting's application of law. In view of the relevant provisions of the law applicable to foreign bills in the Bill Law of our country, it is advisable to use the "issue theory" to identify the place where the ticket is issued. In practice, Chinese banks should choose the applicable terms that are beneficial to their own parties according to the specific conditions. Chapter five discusses the legal problems related to Forfaiting's right of no recourse, and puts forward some suggestions. On the contract Law, the relevant provisions of the Bill Law proposed to improve the amendment. There is no clear stipulation of independent guarantee in our country. According to the law practice of each country, we should establish the independent guarantee system in judicial practice. This paper analyzes the enlightenment of the relativity of Forfaiting's right of no recourse to the norms of Forfaiting's business in our country and puts forward some suggestions for perfection.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996;D922.287;D923.6

【参考文献】