《鹿特丹规则》对货方影响评介与货方利益维护
发布时间：2018-12-07 14:49
【摘要】：《联合国全程或部分海上国际货物运输合同公约》(United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea)于2008年12月11日经第63届联合国大会67次会议审议通过,根据大会决议的授权,2009年9月23日在荷兰鹿特丹举行开放供签署的仪式。与《海牙规则》以及《海牙-维斯比规则》相比,《鹿特丹规则》以统一国际运输法律制度,明确各方权利义务为目的,因此对货方权利义务规定也达到了前所未有的细致与明确。货方权利义务的变化之大,需要引起注意。另据国家统计局数据,十一五期间,海运货物出口量跃居世界前列,我国不仅是船运大国同时也是贸易大国的地位应无疑问。但在海运贸易实践中,货方分散而缺少有力的组织,像美国托运人协会欧洲托运人协会等货方组织在中国大都缺少或不健全；货主又以中小为主,特别江浙东南沿海等小货主居多,法律权利意识淡薄,对国际公约知之甚少。相比之下船方大多谈判力强,面临强大的船方如何维护自己利益是一个值得关注的问题。因此本文从货方的视角分析《鹿特丹规则》关于货方权利义务的影响,审视其责任加重于否,并分析其影响,以期对货方权利义务有更深入清楚的认识,从而有助于货方在国际贸易中保障自身合法利益。 本文提取《鹿特丹规则》涉及货方利益的主要条款及内容,采用分析、比较、逻辑等方法,从货方的视角审视《鹿特丹规则》,分析其中涉及货方利益的主要条款的变化及对货方的影响并进行评价,进而指出货方在新的规则下如何趋利避害维护自己利益。
[Abstract]:The United Nations Convention on contracts for the International Carriage of goods wholly or partly by Sea was considered and adopted on 11 December 2008 by the 63rd session of the General Assembly of the United Nations at its 67th session. A ceremony opened for signature was held in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, on 23 September 2009. Compared with the Hague rules and the Hague-Visby rules, the Rotterdam rules are aimed at unifying the legal regime of international transport and clarifying the rights and obligations of the parties, Therefore, the rights and obligations of the parties to the provisions have reached unprecedented detail and clarity. The changes in the rights and obligations of the consignor need to be noted. In addition, according to the data of the National Bureau of Statistics, the export volume of seaborne goods leapt to the top in the world during the 11th Five-Year Plan period. China is not only a shipping country but also a big trading country. However, in the practice of maritime trade, the cargo parties are scattered and lack of strong organizations, such as the European shippers Association of the United States shippers Association, and most of them are lacking or imperfect in China. Small and medium-sized cargo owners, especially in the southeast coast of Jiangsu and Zhejiang, such as small cargo owners, weak sense of legal rights, little knowledge of international conventions. By contrast, most of the ship negotiating power, facing a strong ship how to protect their own interests is a matter of concern. Therefore, this paper analyzes the impact of the Rotterdam rules on the rights and obligations of the shipper from the point of view of the shipper, examines whether its responsibilities are aggravated, and analyzes its impact, in order to have a deeper and clearer understanding of the rights and obligations of the consignor. In order to help the cargo in international trade to protect their legitimate interests. In this paper, the main terms and contents of Rotterdam rules concerning the interests of the shipper are extracted, and the Rotterdam rules are examined from the perspective of the shipper by means of analysis, comparison, logic and so on. This paper analyzes the changes of the main clauses involved in the benefit of the cargo party and their influence on the goods party, and then points out how the cargo party can seek advantages and avoid harm under the new rules to safeguard its own interests.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.19
本文编号：2367364
[Abstract]:The United Nations Convention on contracts for the International Carriage of goods wholly or partly by Sea was considered and adopted on 11 December 2008 by the 63rd session of the General Assembly of the United Nations at its 67th session. A ceremony opened for signature was held in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, on 23 September 2009. Compared with the Hague rules and the Hague-Visby rules, the Rotterdam rules are aimed at unifying the legal regime of international transport and clarifying the rights and obligations of the parties, Therefore, the rights and obligations of the parties to the provisions have reached unprecedented detail and clarity. The changes in the rights and obligations of the consignor need to be noted. In addition, according to the data of the National Bureau of Statistics, the export volume of seaborne goods leapt to the top in the world during the 11th Five-Year Plan period. China is not only a shipping country but also a big trading country. However, in the practice of maritime trade, the cargo parties are scattered and lack of strong organizations, such as the European shippers Association of the United States shippers Association, and most of them are lacking or imperfect in China. Small and medium-sized cargo owners, especially in the southeast coast of Jiangsu and Zhejiang, such as small cargo owners, weak sense of legal rights, little knowledge of international conventions. By contrast, most of the ship negotiating power, facing a strong ship how to protect their own interests is a matter of concern. Therefore, this paper analyzes the impact of the Rotterdam rules on the rights and obligations of the shipper from the point of view of the shipper, examines whether its responsibilities are aggravated, and analyzes its impact, in order to have a deeper and clearer understanding of the rights and obligations of the consignor. In order to help the cargo in international trade to protect their legitimate interests. In this paper, the main terms and contents of Rotterdam rules concerning the interests of the shipper are extracted, and the Rotterdam rules are examined from the perspective of the shipper by means of analysis, comparison, logic and so on. This paper analyzes the changes of the main clauses involved in the benefit of the cargo party and their influence on the goods party, and then points out how the cargo party can seek advantages and avoid harm under the new rules to safeguard its own interests.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.19
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 赵月林,胡正良;论取消航海过失免责对承运人责任、义务和其他海事法律制度的影响[J];大连海事大学学报(社会科学版);2002年04期
2 陈光华;;《法国民法典》中物权变动的条件与效果[J];法学杂志;2006年03期
3 邢海宝;;论中途停运权[J];法学家;1998年03期
4 胡正良;;《鹿特丹规则》对我国国际海上货物运输业的影响[J];海大法律评论;2009年00期
5 张晶;;试论海上预定运输中托运人的义务[J];南方论刊;2007年06期
6 孙勇志;郭春风;;《鹿特丹规则》“适用范围”的比较研究[J];青岛远洋船员学院学报;2010年03期
7 李凌;;从承运人视角看《鹿特丹规则》[J];水运管理;2010年05期
8 胡长胜;;论《鹿特丹规则》批量合同下的货方利益保护[J];武大国际法评论;2010年S1期
9 秦立崴;;《法国民法典》合同制度改革之争[J];环球法律评论;2011年02期
10 Roy Goldberg,万仁善,许民强;Vimar Seguros诉M/V.Sky Reefer案后撤销外国法院管辖条款的尝试[J];中国海商法年刊;2000年00期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 童玉梅;海运中途停运权研究[D];上海海运学院;2002年
，本文编号：2367364
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2367364.html
