国际投资争端解决的法律化:成就与挑战

发布时间：2019-01-03 08:02

【摘要】：投资条约仲裁是高度法律化的国际投资争端解决方式,是克服合同国际仲裁、东道国当地救济、母国外交保护等传统争端解决方式不足的产物。ICSID公约较好地平衡了投资者与东道国之间投资争端解决的灵活性和法律化,而且获得了绝大多数国家的普遍接受。现代投资条约与ICSID公约仲裁机制的结合导致了从投资合同仲裁到投资条约仲裁的大转型,进而导致投资条约仲裁面临挑战。国际商事仲裁机制不适合解决公法规制性质的投资者与东道国之间的投资条约争端,投资条约规则解释的不确定性和不一致性导致了投资条约仲裁的合法性危机。投资条约仲裁应该进行结构性变革,增加上诉审,增强公开性,增强一致性,增强对于公共利益的敏感性。
[Abstract]:Investment treaty arbitration is a highly legalized form of settlement of international investment disputes. It is a means of overcoming international arbitration of contracts and local remedies of the host country. The ICSID Convention has well balanced the flexibility and legalization of investment dispute settlement between investors and host countries, and has been generally accepted by most countries. The combination of modern investment treaty and ICSID arbitration mechanism leads to the great transition from investment contract arbitration to investment treaty arbitration, which leads to the challenge of investment treaty arbitration. The mechanism of international commercial arbitration is not suitable to solve the disputes between investors and host countries in the nature of public law regulation. The uncertainty and inconsistency of the interpretation of investment treaty rules lead to the legality crisis of investment treaty arbitration. Investment treaty arbitration should undergo structural changes, increase appeals, increase openness, enhance consistency, and enhance public interest sensitivity.
【作者单位】：吉林大学法学院;
【基金】：吉林大学基本科研业务经费种子基金项目:全球经济私人规制的法律问题研究(2010ZZ015)
【分类号】：D997.4

【参考文献】