论执行WTO建议和裁决的合理期限之仲裁
发布时间：2019-01-27 19:36
【摘要】：建议和裁决的执行是WTO争端解决机制的重要组成部分,而且是实现世界贸易组织宗旨或目标的重要手段,而DSU所设置的合理期限制度则是促进建议和裁决执行的重要手段。确定合理期限的方式共有三种,仲裁方式是继“当事方协议”之后最常用的方式,迄今为止已有27个案例采用了这种方法,值得关注的是,最新案例DS414案是中国首个采用仲裁方法确定合理期限的案例。 本文试图讨论确定执行期限之仲裁方式的程序与实体两方面,尤其关注影响执行期限的因素,并对DS414案之裁决和反映出的中国面临的问题进行分析,最后在此基础上试图对完善合理期限制度提出建议。全文共包括四章。 第一章是对WTO争端解决机制下合理期限制度的一般介绍,首先是GATT时期的概况,其次是WTO时期DSU将合理期限制度的成文化及相关具体规定,最后对“裁决执行的合理期限”的具体概念进行了解读。 第二章是本文的主体部分,第一节讨论了仲裁方式的程序方面,包括仲裁的性质、效力,仲裁员的权限、指导原则以及当事方的举证责任,第二节则是关于实体方面,重点介绍了实践中影响具体执行期限的各类因素。 第三章介绍了中国作为当事方的首个DSU第21.3(c)条仲裁案,即DS414案,本章先是对中国入世后提交WTO解决的、已确定执行期限的实践进行概况分析,然后分别从中方、美方与仲裁员主张入手对DS414案的裁决进行分析,最后则尝试为中国如何应对合理期限问题提出管窥之见。 第四章以前三章为基础,第一节试图总结出DSU现有合理期限制度存在的缺陷,第二节则针对上述缺陷一一提出可能的对策。 总之,本文试图对确定“合理期限”的仲裁方式以及中国相关实践进行全面分析,肯定了“合理期限”制度的价值,同时指出其尚待完善之处,以期对理解和利用该制度有所裨益。
[Abstract]:The implementation of recommendations and awards is an important part of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism and an important means to achieve the purpose or goal of the World Trade Organization, while the reasonable period system set by DSU is an important means to promote the implementation of recommendations and awards. There are three ways to determine a reasonable period of time, and arbitration is the most commonly used method following the Agreement of the parties, which has been used in 27 cases to date, and it is noteworthy that, The latest case, DS414, is the first in China to use arbitration to determine a reasonable time limit. This paper attempts to discuss the procedural and substantive aspects of the arbitration method for determining the duration of execution, paying particular attention to the factors that affect the enforcement period, and to analyze the decision of the DS414 case and the problems that China faces, which are reflected in the decision of the DS414 case. Finally, on this basis, attempts to improve the system of reasonable period of time put forward suggestions. The full text includes four chapters. The first chapter is the general introduction of the reasonable period system under the WTO dispute settlement mechanism, first of all, the general situation of the period of GATT, secondly, the culture of the reasonable period system and the relevant specific provisions of DSU in the WTO period. At last, the author interprets the concept of "reasonable period of execution of award". The second chapter is the main part of this paper. The first section discusses the procedural aspects of arbitration, including the nature, effectiveness, authority of the arbitrators, guiding principles and the burden of proof of the parties, and the second section deals with the substantive aspects. This paper mainly introduces the various factors that affect the specific implementation period in practice. The third chapter introduces the first arbitration case of DSU Article 21.3 (c), that is, the DS414 case, to which China is a party. This chapter first analyzes the practice of China's submission to WTO for settlement after China's entry into WTO, and then analyzes the practice of determining the time limit for implementation, respectively, from the Chinese side. The United States and the arbitrators advocated the analysis of the DS414 decision, and finally tried to give a glimpse of how China should deal with the issue of a reasonable period of time. Chapter four is based on the previous three chapters. The first section tries to sum up the defects of the existing reasonable period system in DSU, and the second section puts forward the possible countermeasures against the above defects one by one. In a word, this paper tries to make a comprehensive analysis of the arbitration method of determining the "reasonable time limit" and the relevant practice in China, affirms the value of the "reasonable period" system, and points out that it still needs to be perfected. In order to understand and use the system.
【学位授予单位】：厦门大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D996.1
本文编号：2416623
[Abstract]:The implementation of recommendations and awards is an important part of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism and an important means to achieve the purpose or goal of the World Trade Organization, while the reasonable period system set by DSU is an important means to promote the implementation of recommendations and awards. There are three ways to determine a reasonable period of time, and arbitration is the most commonly used method following the Agreement of the parties, which has been used in 27 cases to date, and it is noteworthy that, The latest case, DS414, is the first in China to use arbitration to determine a reasonable time limit. This paper attempts to discuss the procedural and substantive aspects of the arbitration method for determining the duration of execution, paying particular attention to the factors that affect the enforcement period, and to analyze the decision of the DS414 case and the problems that China faces, which are reflected in the decision of the DS414 case. Finally, on this basis, attempts to improve the system of reasonable period of time put forward suggestions. The full text includes four chapters. The first chapter is the general introduction of the reasonable period system under the WTO dispute settlement mechanism, first of all, the general situation of the period of GATT, secondly, the culture of the reasonable period system and the relevant specific provisions of DSU in the WTO period. At last, the author interprets the concept of "reasonable period of execution of award". The second chapter is the main part of this paper. The first section discusses the procedural aspects of arbitration, including the nature, effectiveness, authority of the arbitrators, guiding principles and the burden of proof of the parties, and the second section deals with the substantive aspects. This paper mainly introduces the various factors that affect the specific implementation period in practice. The third chapter introduces the first arbitration case of DSU Article 21.3 (c), that is, the DS414 case, to which China is a party. This chapter first analyzes the practice of China's submission to WTO for settlement after China's entry into WTO, and then analyzes the practice of determining the time limit for implementation, respectively, from the Chinese side. The United States and the arbitrators advocated the analysis of the DS414 decision, and finally tried to give a glimpse of how China should deal with the issue of a reasonable period of time. Chapter four is based on the previous three chapters. The first section tries to sum up the defects of the existing reasonable period system in DSU, and the second section puts forward the possible countermeasures against the above defects one by one. In a word, this paper tries to make a comprehensive analysis of the arbitration method of determining the "reasonable time limit" and the relevant practice in China, affirms the value of the "reasonable period" system, and points out that it still needs to be perfected. In order to understand and use the system.
【学位授予单位】：厦门大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D996.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 朱翠微;WTO争端解决机制执行程序中的“合理期限”问题探讨[J];长白学刊;2002年01期
2 张乃根;试析WTO争端解决的国际法拘束力[J];复旦学报(社会科学版);2003年06期
3 许敏;;浅析WTO争端解决机制执行中的“合理期限”问题[J];法制与社会;2009年18期
4 吕洋;;论WTO争端解决中的合理期限[J];法制与社会;2011年09期
5 傅星国;;WTO争端解决机制裁决执行的“第一步”——通报执行裁决的意向[J];国际经济合作;2009年01期
6 傅星国;;WTO裁决执行的“合理期限”问题[J];国际经济合作;2009年02期
7 郑小敏;论执行DSB建议和裁决的合理期限[J];河南省政法管理干部学院学报;2005年01期
8 龚柏华;;中国与WTO争端解决:2011年回顾与2012年展望[J];世界贸易组织动态与研究;2012年02期
9 张乃根;;试析WTO争端解决的履行[J];武大国际法评论;2009年01期
10 李晓玲;执行DSB建议和裁决的“合理期限”有多长?[J];WTO经济导刊;2005年11期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 孙书玲;WTO仲裁决定合理执行期限的考虑因素研究[D];华东政法大学;2013年
，本文编号：2416623
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2416623.html
