国际商事仲裁裁决承认与执行中的公共政策运用
发布时间：2019-02-17 14:02
【摘要】：近年来,随着国际经济交往活动日益频繁,国际民商事争议日益增多,越来越多的国际商事争议当事人选择以仲裁方式解决纠纷。而裁决的承认和执行,是商事仲裁制度的核心问题之一,它决定着当事人的意思自治能否实现、仲裁裁决的价值能否最终实现。《纽约公约》明确将违反公共政策作为执行地国法院拒绝承认和执行裁决的理由之一,但是却没有对公共政策作出明确的定义,而是将此问题留给了各国法院。因此,对于裁决的承认和执行,执行地国法院拥有最终的决定权。由于各国的国情存在巨大差异,对于公共政策的理解也必然存在不同,公共政策对于请求承认及执行仲裁裁决的当事人来说,如同悬挂在其头上的一把剑。但是,正由于这种的特性,才使得它在国际商事仲裁领域能够永葆生机,在一国法院排除外国法律的适用、拒绝承认外国仲裁裁决中,作为维护本国根本利益的有力武器。本文旨在通过对国际商事仲裁承认与执行领域中公共政策制度的理论分析以及各国实践中的具体适用,分析我国在国际商事仲裁承认与执行领域中公共政策运用中存在的问题,为完善我国公共政策运用提出些许建议。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the increasingly frequent international economic exchanges, international civil and commercial disputes are increasing, more and more parties to international commercial disputes choose arbitration to resolve disputes. The recognition and enforcement of the award is one of the core issues in the commercial arbitration system, which determines whether the autonomy of the parties' will can be realized. Whether the value of an arbitral award can ultimately be realized. The New York Convention explicitly makes breach of public policy one of the grounds for refusing recognition and enforcement of the award by the courts of the State in which it is enforced, but does not provide a clear definition of public policy, Instead, the matter was left to national courts. Therefore, for the recognition and enforcement of the award, the court of the country of enforcement has the final decision. Due to the great differences in the national conditions of each country, the understanding of public policy is bound to be different. Public policy is like a sword hanging on its head to the party requesting recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award. However, it is precisely because of this characteristic that it can always retain its vitality in the field of international commercial arbitration. It can exclude the application of foreign law in the courts of a country and refuse to recognize foreign arbitral awards as a powerful weapon to safeguard the fundamental interests of its own country. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the problems existing in the application of public policy in the field of recognition and enforcement of international commercial arbitration through the theoretical analysis of the public policy system in the field of recognition and enforcement of international commercial arbitration and the practical application in various countries. In order to improve the use of public policy in China put forward some suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D997.4
本文编号：2425240
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the increasingly frequent international economic exchanges, international civil and commercial disputes are increasing, more and more parties to international commercial disputes choose arbitration to resolve disputes. The recognition and enforcement of the award is one of the core issues in the commercial arbitration system, which determines whether the autonomy of the parties' will can be realized. Whether the value of an arbitral award can ultimately be realized. The New York Convention explicitly makes breach of public policy one of the grounds for refusing recognition and enforcement of the award by the courts of the State in which it is enforced, but does not provide a clear definition of public policy, Instead, the matter was left to national courts. Therefore, for the recognition and enforcement of the award, the court of the country of enforcement has the final decision. Due to the great differences in the national conditions of each country, the understanding of public policy is bound to be different. Public policy is like a sword hanging on its head to the party requesting recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award. However, it is precisely because of this characteristic that it can always retain its vitality in the field of international commercial arbitration. It can exclude the application of foreign law in the courts of a country and refuse to recognize foreign arbitral awards as a powerful weapon to safeguard the fundamental interests of its own country. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the problems existing in the application of public policy in the field of recognition and enforcement of international commercial arbitration through the theoretical analysis of the public policy system in the field of recognition and enforcement of international commercial arbitration and the practical application in various countries. In order to improve the use of public policy in China put forward some suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D997.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杜新丽;论外国仲裁裁决在我国的承认与执行——兼论《纽约公约》在中国的适用[J];比较法研究;2005年04期
2 顾维遐;;《纽约公约》下的公共政策解读:两岸四地的区域性发展与合作[J];比较法研究;2010年01期
3 黄亚英;;仲裁制度的发展与《纽约公约》的历史贡献——纪念《纽约公约》创设50周年[J];北京仲裁;2008年03期
4 赵秀文;;论非内国裁决的法律性质——兼论《纽约公约》的适用范围[J];北京仲裁;2008年04期
5 黄亚英;;论《纽约公约》与仲裁协议的法律适用——兼评中国加入《纽约公约》二十年的实践[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2009年02期
6 万鄂湘;;《纽约公约》在中国的司法实践[J];法律适用;2009年03期
7 黄亚英,李薇薇;论1958年《纽约公约》中的“更优权利条款”[J];法学杂志;2000年02期
8 赵秀文;论ICC国际仲裁院裁决在我国的承认与执行[J];法学;2005年06期
9 赵秀文;;从相关案例看ICC仲裁院裁决在我国的承认与执行[J];法学;2010年03期
10 张潇剑;;论国际商事仲裁中的法律选择[J];求是学刊;2011年02期
，本文编号：2425240
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2425240.html
