《纽约公约》中“公共政策”的理解与适用——以最高人民法院批复的8起案件为样本

发布时间：2019-02-19 21:29

【摘要】：从最高人民法院审查的地方各级法院拟援引公共政策拒绝承认和执行仲裁裁决的8起案件来看,中国法院对公共政策的理解与适用存在较大差异。而其他《纽约公约》缔约国及国际仲裁法学界对《纽约公约》中的"公共政策"在适用理念、内涵、外延与司法审查尺度方面则日益趋同。中国法院在理解与适用《纽约公约》中的公共政策时,应树立支持仲裁、限制解释与适用的理念;坚持区别对待、准确适用法律依据进行司法审查;坚持本土化与国际化兼容确定公共政策基准;破除地方保护主义,以中国根本利益作为公共政策内容;坚持审慎、合理使用少援引、说尽理的技术操作方式。
[Abstract]:Judging from the 8 cases in which the local courts at all levels examined by the Supreme people's Court intend to invoke public policies to refuse to recognize and enforce arbitral awards, there are great differences in the understanding and application of public policies by Chinese courts. Other Contracting States of the New York Convention and international arbitration law circles are increasingly similar to the "public policy" in the application of the New York Convention in the aspects of concept, connotation, extension and the scale of judicial review. When Chinese courts understand and apply the public policy in the New York Convention, they should establish the idea of supporting arbitration, limiting interpretation and application, insisting on discriminating treatment and applying the legal basis accurately to judicial review; Adhere to localization and internationalization compatible to determine public policy benchmarks; break local protectionism, take China's fundamental interests as the content of public policy; adhere to prudent, reasonable use of less cited, reasonable technical operation.
【作者单位】：广州海事法院深圳法庭;
【分类号】：D997.4

【参考文献】