国际航空犯罪法人刑事责任及其国内立法转化研究

发布时间：2019-02-19 15:41

【摘要】：2010年《北京公约》和《北京议定书》首次规定了国际航空犯罪法人责任,法人责任以法人的高级管理人员代表法人实施劫持航空器等国际航空犯罪为要件,法人为此承担刑事、民事或行政责任。公约对法人犯罪及其责任的立法需要转化为国内法才能适用。世界各国国内法对法人犯罪及其责任的态度差别较大,英国、加拿大、法国等国刑法规定有航空犯罪的法人刑事责任,德国国内法规定有航空犯罪的法人行政责任,意大利刑法规定有航空犯罪的法人民事责任,我国仅在个别航空犯罪中规定有法人犯罪及其刑事责任。我国法人犯罪及其刑事责任的立法和理论具有较强的包容性,可在我国刑法中取消法人犯罪法定化限制,全面规定包括航空犯罪在内的法人犯罪及其刑事责任。
[Abstract]:The 2010 Beijing Convention and the Beijing Protocol stipulate for the first time the liability of legal persons for international aviation crimes. The legal persons' liability is to commit international aviation crimes such as hijacking aircraft on behalf of legal persons by the senior management of legal persons, for which legal persons bear the criminal responsibility. Civil or administrative liability The legislation of the convention on corporate crime and its liability needs to be translated into domestic law before it can be applied. The attitude towards legal person crime and its liability varies greatly in the domestic laws of various countries in the world. The criminal law of Britain, Canada, France and other countries provide for the criminal liability of legal persons for aviation crimes, while the domestic laws of Germany stipulate the administrative liability of legal persons for aviation crimes. The criminal law of Italy stipulates the civil liability of legal person for aviation crime, and our country only prescribes legal person crime and its criminal liability in individual aviation crime. The legislation and theory of legal person crime and its criminal liability in our country have strong inclusiveness. We can abolish the legal limitation of legal person crime in our criminal law, and comprehensively stipulate the legal person crime including aviation crime and its criminal liability.
【作者单位】：中国民航大学法学院;中国民航大学航空法律与政策研究中心;
【基金】：国家社科基金一般项目“航空犯罪及我国航空刑法规范体系完善研究”(15BFX054)的阶段性成果之一
【分类号】：D924.3;D997.9

【相似文献】