《鹿特丹规则》下货物控制权制度研究
发布时间：2019-02-26 12:47
【摘要】：货物控制权本来是国际贸易法上的规定,在《鹿特丹规则》之前签订的国际海上货物运输的公约中,包括《汉堡规则》、《海牙—维斯比规则》以及《国际货物多式联运公约》中,并没有关于货物控制权的规定。而《鹿特丹规则》则首次以专章的形式明确完整地规定了货物控制权制度,第一次在有关海上货物运输的国际公约中引入货物控制权及控制方的概念。这是对国际海上货物运输法律制度的重大完善,其意义是成功的实现了海上运输法律制度与货物贸易法律制度之间的斜街,虽然《鹿特丹规则》下的货物控制权依然存在着许多实际性的操作问题,但是明确规定该权利还是具有很多积极意义的,例如形成海上运输法律制度与国际贸易法律制度的桥梁,加强了卖方的救济权利的保护,适应了国际贸易和海运方式的变革等等。 本文将从《鹿特丹规则》中关于货物控制权的概念、法律性质入手,将货物控制权和英美法系中的中途停运权进行比较,并且概括了《鹿特丹规则》规定货物控制权的意义等等；紧接着,本文讨论了《鹿特丹规则》中货物控制权的主体和内容以及《鹿特丹规则》的行使和限制。 最后一部分,是关于我国相关法律的分析,我国并没有专门的货物控制权制度,只有在《合同法》第308条有类似于货物控制权制度的规定,但是该规定过于简陋,可操作性不高,笔者从立法和司法两个角度进行分析,认为我国应该借鉴《鹿特丹规则》中的相关规定,引进货物控制权制度。
[Abstract]:Control of goods, which was originally provided for in international trade law and included in the Convention on the International Carriage of goods by Sea, concluded prior to the Rotterdam rules, including the Hamburg rules, There is no provision for control of goods in the Hague-Visby rules and the International Convention on Multimodal Transport of goods. The Rotterdam rules, for the first time, clearly and completely prescribe the system of control of goods in the form of a special chapter. For the first time, the concept of control of goods and the controlling party are introduced into the international convention on the carriage of goods by sea. This is a major improvement of the legal system of the international carriage of goods by sea, and its significance is to successfully realize the oblique street between the legal regime of maritime carriage and the legal regime of trade in goods. Although there are still many practical operational problems with the control of goods under the Rotterdam rules, it is still very positive to specify this right, For example, the formation of a bridge between the legal system of maritime transport and the legal regime of international trade strengthens the protection of the seller's relief rights and adapts to the changes of international trade and maritime transport methods, and so on. Starting with the concept and legal nature of the right of control of goods in the Rotterdam rules, this paper compares the right of control of goods to the right of stoppage in the Anglo-American law system. And summed up the Rotterdam rules of control of the meaning of goods, and so on; Then, this paper discusses the subject and content of the control right of goods in Rotterdam rules, and the exercise and restriction of Rotterdam rules. The last part is about the analysis of the relevant laws of our country, China does not have a special system of control of goods, only in Article 308 of the contract Law there is a regulation similar to the system of control of goods, but this provision is too simple. The author analyzes it from the angle of legislation and judicature, and points out that China should draw lessons from the relevant provisions of Rotterdam rules and introduce the system of control of goods.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996.19;D923.6;D922.294
本文编号：2430783
[Abstract]:Control of goods, which was originally provided for in international trade law and included in the Convention on the International Carriage of goods by Sea, concluded prior to the Rotterdam rules, including the Hamburg rules, There is no provision for control of goods in the Hague-Visby rules and the International Convention on Multimodal Transport of goods. The Rotterdam rules, for the first time, clearly and completely prescribe the system of control of goods in the form of a special chapter. For the first time, the concept of control of goods and the controlling party are introduced into the international convention on the carriage of goods by sea. This is a major improvement of the legal system of the international carriage of goods by sea, and its significance is to successfully realize the oblique street between the legal regime of maritime carriage and the legal regime of trade in goods. Although there are still many practical operational problems with the control of goods under the Rotterdam rules, it is still very positive to specify this right, For example, the formation of a bridge between the legal system of maritime transport and the legal regime of international trade strengthens the protection of the seller's relief rights and adapts to the changes of international trade and maritime transport methods, and so on. Starting with the concept and legal nature of the right of control of goods in the Rotterdam rules, this paper compares the right of control of goods to the right of stoppage in the Anglo-American law system. And summed up the Rotterdam rules of control of the meaning of goods, and so on; Then, this paper discusses the subject and content of the control right of goods in Rotterdam rules, and the exercise and restriction of Rotterdam rules. The last part is about the analysis of the relevant laws of our country, China does not have a special system of control of goods, only in Article 308 of the contract Law there is a regulation similar to the system of control of goods, but this provision is too simple. The author analyzes it from the angle of legislation and judicature, and points out that China should draw lessons from the relevant provisions of Rotterdam rules and introduce the system of control of goods.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996.19;D923.6;D922.294
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 张晓莲;;对货物控制权制度的思考[J];法学与实践;2010年03期
2 王丽;赵伟丽;;FOB条件下托运人的认定[J];法制与社会;2008年30期
3 祁长生;;FOB贸易术语下卖方如何规避风险[J];黑龙江对外经贸;2006年03期
4 刘昕;海运货物控制权问题研究——兼评UNCITRAL运输法草案第11章的规定[J];江苏社会科学;2004年02期
5 费宏达;;《鹿特丹规则》视野下FOB条件下卖方之货物控制权[J];辽宁行政学院学报;2010年04期
，本文编号：2430783
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2430783.html
