WTO争端解决机制下的中美贸易摩擦研究
[Abstract]:Since the establishment of trade relations between China and the United States, trade exchanges between China and the United States have become increasingly close, in which inevitably there are frictions and contradictions, and the development path of Sino-US trade is very zigzag. Gradually, the United States has become the most frequent and fiercest country in trade friction with China. On the one hand, what we can see is the huge American market, the potential huge Chinese market and the increasingly close economic and trade exchanges; On the other hand, we should realize that the economic and trade policy of the United States is a combination of economic and political interests. In the face of this situation, I do not know what the future trend of Sino-US trade will be. First of all, by reviewing the specific events of Sino-US trade friction in recent years, this paper analyzes the new characteristics of Sino-US trade friction, such as the aggravation of politicization, the compound and normality of friction, and the linkage effect on the region and even the whole world. Secondly, the reason why the Sino-US trade friction is increasing is due to the state of Sino-US trade deficit, the serious trade protectionism of the United States and the defects of our economy. The second part of the article focuses on the necessity and obstacles of using WTO dispute settlement mechanism to resolve Sino-US trade disputes, expounds what is the WTO dispute settlement mechanism, and why developing countries should make use of this mechanism. And China's use of this mechanism to resolve Sino-US trade disputes obstacles. Finally, this paper discusses the methods and strategies of using WTO dispute settlement mechanism to solve trade frictions in China. The author thinks that the trade friction between China and the United States is the inevitable result of the collision between the two systems. We should treat it positively and take the initiative to find out its own reasons under the general environment. China should perfect the legal system suitable for the WTO rules. In the process of supporting the development of enterprises, we should pay attention to the optimization of the business environment of the enterprises rather than simply using funds to support them. In addition, China should establish a dynamic early-warning mechanism for US trade information and establish research and advisory bodies specifically for Sino-US trade disputes, and at the same time, China should be more proactive in prosecuting and responding to complaints. Take appropriate retaliatory action in order to defend your own interests. At the level of international law, the article puts forward that China should embody more initiative and give full play to the right of speech in the reform of WTO rules, and should actively participate in and promote the norms and reforms of the anti-dumping rules, countervailing rules and safeguard measures of WTO.
【学位授予单位】:中南民族大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D996.1;F752
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 徐运良;;论协调WTO争端解决机制与RTAs争端解决机制管辖权冲突的原则[J];法学杂志;2009年03期
2 梁开银;;论ICSID与WTO争端解决机制的冲突及选择——以国家和私人投资争议解决为视角[J];法学杂志;2009年08期
3 吴建功;;WTO争端解决机制中的不公正性:以发展中国家成员为视角[J];法学杂志;2010年01期
4 余敏友;;WTO争端解决活动——中国表现及其改进建议[J];法学评论;2008年04期
5 张金龙;;WTO争端解决机制与中国应对的思考[J];法制与社会;2011年11期
6 陈利强;屠新泉;;美国对华实施“双轨制反补贴措施”问题研究[J];国际贸易问题;2010年02期
7 邝艳湘;;经济相互依赖与中美贸易摩擦:基于多阶段博弈模型的研究[J];国际贸易问题;2010年11期
8 周骏宇;周文贵;;中美贸易摩擦:动态与理性透视[J];国际经贸探索;2007年12期
9 余利红;刘海云;;我国报复威胁与美国对华反倾销关系实证研究[J];国际经贸探索;2011年10期
10 苟大凯;;中国出口税承诺对GATT1994一般例外条款的可援引性——基于《中国入世议定书》第11.3段通常含义的解释[J];国际贸易;2011年08期
相关博士学位论文 前9条
1 高田甜;WTO争端解决机制证明负担规则研究[D];华东政法大学;2010年
2 蔡强;美国对华新贸易保护主义的负效应[D];吉林大学;2011年
3 何宪民;WTO体制下贸易救济实施与中国的应对策略研究[D];天津财经大学;2011年
4 蒋奋;WTO《补贴与反补贴措施协定》中的“利益”问题研究[D];华东政法大学;2011年
5 傅瑜;论中美贸易关系[D];西南财经大学;2009年
6 孟祺;垂直专业化和中美贸易不平衡[D];南京农业大学;2009年
7 赵恩广;论区域经济一体化争端解决机制在WTO框架下的并存及拓展[D];复旦大学;2010年
8 张波;中美贸易失衡问题研究[D];东北财经大学;2009年
9 邹伟伟;中美经贸关系的历史发展与政策博弈[D];西南财经大学;2010年
本文编号:2452622
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2452622.html