论国际商事仲裁临时措施的发布与执行
发布时间：2019-04-27 11:11
【摘要】：国际商事仲裁临时措施制度涉及到各方利益的平衡,也是公平和效率的平衡。临时措施的决定和执行是整个仲裁保全制度的核心。到底应当由法院抑或由仲裁庭决定采用保全措施,以及由仲裁庭做出的临时措施在域外执行力如何等问题,一直以来是法学界争议和研究的焦点。 2006年修订的《联合国仲裁示范法》以及2010年8月15日新生效的《联合国国际贸易法委员会仲裁规则》都把临时措施的改革作为这次修订的主要任务之一,与之前的粗线条的条文相比,修订后内容更加饱满,操作也更加规范。《示范法》以及《联合国国际贸易法委员会仲裁规则》的修订,为各个国家修订本国的仲裁法起到示范作用,一些国家和地区也根据本国的实际情况以《示范法》为蓝本进行了修订。 本文以《示范法》以及《联合国国际贸易法委员会仲裁规则》为主线,对各个国家以及国际仲裁机构的立法与实践进行了梳理,对当前国内外的研究进行了总结,就临时措施的核心问题——仲裁庭发布临时措施及其域外执行——以仲裁庭的角度进行了评析,并且对于临时措施多方关系做了法理分析,展望了临时措施的发展趋势。在此基础之上,针对我国临时措施存在的不足,提出了完善的意见,希望我国的仲裁事业能顺应国际的潮流,立足本国的国情,在立法上作出适当的修改。
[Abstract]:The system of interim measures in international commercial arbitration involves the balance of the interests of all parties, as well as the balance between fairness and efficiency. The decision and execution of interim measures is the core of the whole arbitration preservation system. Whether the court or the arbitral tribunal should decide whether to adopt the measures of protection and the extraterritorial execution of the interim measures taken by the arbitral tribunal has always been the focus of controversy and research in the field of law. The United Nations Arbitration Model Law, as amended in 2006, and the Arbitration rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, which entered into force on 15 August 2010, have made the reform of interim measures one of the main tasks of this revision, The revised text is fuller and more prescriptive than the previous provisions in bold lines. The Model Law and the revision of the Arbitration rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, It serves as a model for individual countries to revise their own arbitration laws, and some countries and regions have also revised the Model Law on the basis of the actual situation in their countries. Taking the Model Law and the Arbitration rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law as the main thread, this paper combs the legislation and practice of various countries and international arbitration institutions, and summarizes the current research at home and abroad, This paper analyzes the core issue of interim measures-the issue of interim measures by arbitral tribunal and its extraterritorial enforcement-from the point of view of arbitral tribunal, and makes a legal analysis of the multi-party relationship of interim measures, and looks forward to the development trend of interim measures. On this basis, aiming at the deficiency of the temporary measures in our country, this paper puts forward some perfect opinions, and hopes that the arbitration enterprise of our country can conform to the international trend, base on the national conditions of our country, and make appropriate amendments in the legislation.
【学位授予单位】：浙江工商大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D997.4
本文编号：2466928
[Abstract]:The system of interim measures in international commercial arbitration involves the balance of the interests of all parties, as well as the balance between fairness and efficiency. The decision and execution of interim measures is the core of the whole arbitration preservation system. Whether the court or the arbitral tribunal should decide whether to adopt the measures of protection and the extraterritorial execution of the interim measures taken by the arbitral tribunal has always been the focus of controversy and research in the field of law. The United Nations Arbitration Model Law, as amended in 2006, and the Arbitration rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, which entered into force on 15 August 2010, have made the reform of interim measures one of the main tasks of this revision, The revised text is fuller and more prescriptive than the previous provisions in bold lines. The Model Law and the revision of the Arbitration rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, It serves as a model for individual countries to revise their own arbitration laws, and some countries and regions have also revised the Model Law on the basis of the actual situation in their countries. Taking the Model Law and the Arbitration rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law as the main thread, this paper combs the legislation and practice of various countries and international arbitration institutions, and summarizes the current research at home and abroad, This paper analyzes the core issue of interim measures-the issue of interim measures by arbitral tribunal and its extraterritorial enforcement-from the point of view of arbitral tribunal, and makes a legal analysis of the multi-party relationship of interim measures, and looks forward to the development trend of interim measures. On this basis, aiming at the deficiency of the temporary measures in our country, this paper puts forward some perfect opinions, and hopes that the arbitration enterprise of our country can conform to the international trend, base on the national conditions of our country, and make appropriate amendments in the legislation.
【学位授予单位】：浙江工商大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D997.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 任明艳;;国际商事仲裁中仲裁员发布临时性保全措施问题[J];北京仲裁;2007年01期
2 张恒;;论美国仲裁协会国际仲裁规则中的紧急保全措施[J];北京仲裁;2008年03期
3 王玉婷;;全球化下的国际商事仲裁临时措施制度——兼论我国相关制度的完善[J];对外经贸实务;2006年04期
4 杜开林;对一起仲裁证据保全案的评析——兼论现行仲裁证据保全法律规定的不足[J];法律适用;2003年05期
5 潘伟;关于知识产权诉前行为保全的法律思考[J];法律适用;2004年04期
6 林一飞;论仲裁与第三人[J];法学评论;2000年01期
7 江伟，李浩;论人民法院与仲裁机构的新型关系──为《仲裁法》的颁行而作[J];法学评论;1995年04期
8 刘永明,王显荣;“经济全球化”下国际商事仲裁领域临时保全措施的发展趋势——兼论我国国际商事仲裁领域临时保全措施的完善[J];河北法学;2003年02期
9 赵秀文;;《国际商事仲裁示范法》对临时性保全措施条款的修订[J];时代法学;2009年03期
10 刘俊霞;;2010年《联合国国际贸易法委员会仲裁规则》评析[J];时代法学;2010年06期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 一言;[N];人民法院报;2001年
，本文编号：2466928
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2466928.html
