国际投资仲裁中“条约选购”问题研究

发布时间：2019-05-29 23:58

【摘要】：当今国际投资实践中,越来越多的跨国投资者通过国籍规划或是公司重组方式来选购能够为其投资提供更高保护标准的条约。作为国际投资领域的新兴问题,学界对“条约选购”的正当性、合法性尚未形成统一的意见,国际投资仲裁机构(本文仅讨论ICSID)对“条约选购”的性质也没有表示出明确的态度,ICSID仲裁庭对涉及“条约选购”的投资争端甚至存在着两种截然不同的裁决结果。造成相异裁决结果的因素主要有两个:一是投资者实施“条约选购”行为的时间点;二是投资者在实施“条约选购”行为时是否具有“善意”。此外,ICSID的仲裁机制、认定投资者国籍与合格投资的标准、仲裁请求权的来源等因素也都影响着仲裁裁决结果。借鉴ICSID对涉及“条约选购”案件的处理结果,结合我国在国际投资领域的现状,我国海外投资者在投资前应当对投资目标国做好背景调查及规划工作,尽量进行事前的“条约选购”。当中国作为国际投资东道国时,面对“条约选购”问题,首先应当明确我国对“条约选购”问题的态度,其次要在相关条约中对“投资者”和“投资”的含义有所限定,最后在争端诉诸ICSID时合理利用揭开公司面纱制度防止外国投资者滥用条约。
[Abstract]:In today's international investment practice, more and more transnational investors choose and purchase treaties that can provide higher standards of protection for their investments through nationality planning or corporate restructuring. As a new issue in the field of international investment, the legitimacy and legitimacy of "treaty purchase" has not yet formed a unified opinion in academic circles. The international investment arbitration institution (this paper only discusses ICSID) has not expressed a clear attitude towards the nature of "treaty purchase". The ICSID arbitral tribunal has even two different decisions on investment disputes involving "treaty purchase". There are two main factors that cause the result of different decisions: one is the time when investors implement the behavior of "treaty purchase", the other is whether investors have "good faith" when implementing the behavior of "treaty purchase". In addition, the arbitration mechanism of ICSID, the criteria for determining the nationality and qualified investment of investors, and the source of arbitration claim also affect the outcome of arbitration award. Drawing lessons from the results of ICSID in dealing with the cases involving "treaty selection and purchase", combined with the present situation of China in the field of international investment, overseas investors in China should do a good job in background investigation and planning of the target countries before investing. Try to carry out the "treaty purchase" in advance. When China is the host country of international investment, in the face of the problem of "treaty purchase", we should first make clear our attitude towards the problem of "treaty purchase", and secondly, define the meaning of "investor" and "investment" in the relevant treaties. Finally, when the dispute resorts to ICSID, it is reasonable to use the company veil system to prevent foreign investors from abusing the treaty.
【学位授予单位】：广西民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D997.4

【参考文献】