论意思自治原则在动产物权法律适用中的限制
发布时间：2019-06-14 13:23
【摘要】：我国《涉外民事关系法律适用法》第37条规定了意思自治原则在动产物权法律适用中的泛化适用,这虽被称为该法中最具前瞻性和创造性的规定,但在学界引起了热议,同时也给实务带来了争议。意思自治原则泛化适用的流弊主要在于:与物权法定主义相悖,令民法典部分内容逻辑不能自洽;易致动产物权准据法的分割;增加了司法实践的困难。冲突法的意思自治原则根源于民法相关领域的任意性规范。在现有物权种类和内容的范围方面仍存在较多的意思自治空间,如适用债权意思主义物权变动模式的各类情形;可将意思自治原则在动产物权冲突法的合理适用限定于此。我国民法典编纂为现行各民事单行法之间的逻辑矛盾和内容疏漏提供了难得的修正契机;就动产物权冲突法中意思自治原则合理适用而言,物权编可在物权法定原则的缓和以及区分原则的进一步明晰方面进行有效的规范衔接。
[Abstract]:Article 37 of the Law on the Application of Law on Foreign-related Civil Relations stipulates the general application of the principle of autonomy of will in the application of real right in movable property. Although this is called the most forward-looking and creative provision in this law, it has aroused heated discussion in academic circles and brought controversy to practice at the same time. The disadvantages of the generalization and application of the principle of autonomy of will mainly lie in that it is contrary to the legalism of real right, which makes the logic of some contents of the civil code impossible to conform to itself, the division of the applicable law of real right of movable property, and increases the difficulty of judicial practice. The principle of autonomy of will in conflict law is rooted in arbitrary norms in related fields of civil law. There are still more room for autonomy of will in the scope of the existing types and contents of real right, such as the application of creditor's idealism in the mode of real right change, and the reasonable application of the principle of autonomy of will in the conflict law of movable property right can be limited to this. The compilation of civil code in our country provides a rare opportunity to amend the logical contradictions and content omissions between the current civil separate laws. As far as the reasonable application of the principle of autonomy of will in the conflict law of real right of movable property is concerned, the compilation of real right can carry on the effective normative connection in the relaxation of the principle of legality of real right and the further clarification of the principle of distinction.
【作者单位】： 华东政法大学国际法学院;
【基金】：2015年中国法学会部级法学研究课题“法治思维下中国涉外民商事法律体系完善研究”(项目编号:CLS[2015]D150)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923;D997
[Abstract]:Article 37 of the Law on the Application of Law on Foreign-related Civil Relations stipulates the general application of the principle of autonomy of will in the application of real right in movable property. Although this is called the most forward-looking and creative provision in this law, it has aroused heated discussion in academic circles and brought controversy to practice at the same time. The disadvantages of the generalization and application of the principle of autonomy of will mainly lie in that it is contrary to the legalism of real right, which makes the logic of some contents of the civil code impossible to conform to itself, the division of the applicable law of real right of movable property, and increases the difficulty of judicial practice. The principle of autonomy of will in conflict law is rooted in arbitrary norms in related fields of civil law. There are still more room for autonomy of will in the scope of the existing types and contents of real right, such as the application of creditor's idealism in the mode of real right change, and the reasonable application of the principle of autonomy of will in the conflict law of movable property right can be limited to this. The compilation of civil code in our country provides a rare opportunity to amend the logical contradictions and content omissions between the current civil separate laws. As far as the reasonable application of the principle of autonomy of will in the conflict law of real right of movable property is concerned, the compilation of real right can carry on the effective normative connection in the relaxation of the principle of legality of real right and the further clarification of the principle of distinction.
【作者单位】： 华东政法大学国际法学院;
【基金】：2015年中国法学会部级法学研究课题“法治思维下中国涉外民商事法律体系完善研究”(项目编号:CLS[2015]D150)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923;D997
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 胡晓红;略论我国涉外动产物权的法律适用[J];兰州大学学报;1994年02期
2 高文骁;论动产物权移转与公示原则[J];公安与司法研究.新疆公安司法管理干部学院学报;1998年03期
3 刘爱萍;;特殊动产物权变动中的疑难问题[J];山东审判;2008年01期
4 何智慧;论涉外动产物权的法律适用[J];现代法学;2000年04期
5 陈盛;张熙;;我国动产物权登记制度研讨[J];现代商贸工业;2011年21期
6 张丽洋;;我国动产物权登记制度探讨[J];大家;2011年10期
7 付蓉;;论我国动产物权法律适用中的意思自治原则的合理性[J];特区经济;2014年03期
8 屈茂辉;;动产物权登记制度研究[J];河北法学;2006年05期
9 崔建远;;再论动产物权变动的生效要件[J];法学家;2010年05期
10 俞渊;孙娅娣;;论动产物权的法律适用——兼评《涉外民事关系法律适用法》第37条[J];湖北警官学院学报;2012年02期
相关重要报纸文章 前8条
1 邹云翔;自行车实名登记是对动产物权的侵犯[N];中国经济时报;2007年
2 见习记者 李s，
本文编号：2499419
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2499419.html
