国际域名争议解决机制的利益平衡研究

发布时间：2019-06-14 18:15

【摘要】：国际域名争议的解决是重要的网络法律问题,也是法学研究的前沿性热点问题。本文以“利益平衡理论”为基础,对争议解决机制进行系统的利益平衡考量,提出作者自己的观点。全文由引言、正文五章和结语组成。引言部分说明了选题的背景及价值、国内外研究现状以及文章所采用的研究方法。第一章全面阐述利益平衡理论。法律是协助人们实现特定目的的手段或工具。利益是法律的产生之源,法律的根本目的不仅仅是维护利益,进一步说应该是维护以统治集团根本利益为基础的利益平衡。法律通过设定权利义务以及在立法、司法等各方面运用利益平衡方法来实现自身的目的。利益平衡理论为下文的研究提供理论基础。第二章明确提出国际域名争议解决机制中利益平衡的基本问题。国际域名争议解决机制利益平衡的基本目标应当是通过争议的解决促进网络健康发展。所涉利益类型包括国家利益、社会公共利益和当事人个人利益,利益平衡类型主要包括域名权益人与传统权利人之间的利益平衡以及争议所涉国家之间的利益平衡。利益平衡的基本要求包括权利与义务的平衡以及公平与效率的平衡。第三章深入探讨国际域名争议案件司法管辖中的利益平衡。独立管辖体制理论,包括网络自治论、管辖权相对论和第四国际空间论,无法符合利益平衡要求,不会得到任何国家的接受。各国都是通过发展传统管辖理论和依据来应对国际域名争议案件的管辖问题。美国“最低联系”管辖理论能够较好地平衡各种利益关系,值得肯定。我国在传统侵权行为地管辖依据基础上形成了“设备所在地”管辖模式,“被告侵权设备所在地”应作为主要管辖依据,“原告发现侵权信息的计算机终端等设备所在地”可作为侵权行为实施地难以确定时的辅助管辖依据。另外,“原告就被告”原则总体上能够适应实践要求,应当坚持。这些管辖依据和原则符合我国实际情况,可以比较有效地平衡当事人利益,也有利于我国法院司法资源的有效利用。第四章系统研究国际域名争议案件实体法中的利益平衡。文章将国际域名与商标争议分为域名抢注、域名盗用和权利冲突三种,对美国和我国的国内实体法律规则及其适用进行利益平衡分析,并对域名与非商标标识争议的实体规则及其适用进行论述。第五章详细论述国际域名争议专家裁决机制中的利益平衡。ICANN机制在程序方面能满足利益平衡要求,实现程序的高效和公正；在实体方面则过于侧重保护商标权,对域名权益人的利益保护不力。该状况是时代环境、认识局限和特定利益代表等多种原因作用的结果。要加强对域名权益人利益的保护,就要完善“反向域名侵夺”规则。在时机成熟时可增加“投诉人为域名权益人”的侵犯域名权的投诉类型。我国的专家裁决机制与ICANN机制十分相似,对域名权益人的保护也不力,所以应加强这方面的机制建设,实现当事人利益的真正平衡。结语部分总括全文内容并再一次鲜明提出本文的中心论点：利益平衡理论应作为国际域名争议解决机制建设和实践的重要理论基础。从总体上看,现有争议解决机制在程序方面较好地体现了利益平衡理念,但在实体方面明显偏重对传统权利人的利益保护,未能真正维护当事人之间的利益平衡。所以,从长远来看,需要在利益平衡理论指导下在实体方面加以完善。
[Abstract]:The solution of the dispute of the international domain name is an important legal problem of the network, and it is also a hot issue of the leading edge of the legal research. Based on the "balance of interest theory", this paper puts forward the author's own views on the balance of the system of the dispute settlement mechanism. The full text consists of the introduction, the body of the text and the conclusion. The introduction section explains the background and value of the topic, the current research situation at home and abroad, and the study party adopted by the article. Law. Chapter I fully sets out the benefit level The theory of scale. The law is a means of assisting people to achieve a specific purpose. Or a tool. The benefit is the source of the law. The fundamental purpose of the law is not only for the maintenance of interests, but also for the maintenance of the benefit of the fundamental interests of the ruling group. The law is to realize self-balance by setting the rights and obligations and using the balance of interests in the aspects of legislation and the administration of justice. The purpose of the study is to provide a basis for the following research. On the basis of the second chapter, the interest balance in the dispute settlement mechanism of the international domain name is put forward in the second chapter The basic objective of the interests balance of the international domain name dispute settlement mechanism should be to promote the network through the dispute resolution The types of interests involved include national interests, social public interests and the personal interests of the parties. The type of interest balance mainly includes the balance between the interests of the domain name and the traditional rights and the state of the dispute The balance of interests and the balance of interests, including the balance of rights and obligations, and equity and The third chapter probes into the jurisdiction of the international domain name dispute case. The balance of interests under the jurisdiction. Independent jurisdiction system theory, including the theory of network self-government, the theory of jurisdiction relativity and the fourth international space theory, cannot meet the requirements of interest balance and will not be obtained The acceptance of any country. Each country is to deal with the international domain name dispute through the development of the traditional jurisdiction theory and the basis The question of the jurisdiction of the case. The American "minimum contact" 's jurisdiction theory can balance the interests of various interests The relationship is worth the affirmation. In our country, the "Location of the equipment" 's jurisdictional model is formed on the basis of the jurisdiction of the traditional tort, and the "The location of the defendant's infringing equipment" should serve as the basis for the main jurisdiction. The "where the plaintiff found the location of the computer terminal, such as the infringing information," can be difficult to determine when it is implemented as a tort. The basis for auxiliary jurisdiction. In addition, the "The plaintiff is the defendant" principle can be adapted to practice as a whole The requirements should be adhered to. These jurisdictional bases and principles are in accordance with the actual situation of our country, which can balance the interests of the parties effectively and benefit the judicial administration of our country. The fourth chapter is to study the case of international domain name disputes. The interest balance in the substantive law. The article divides the international domain name and the trademark dispute into three kinds of domain name, domain name theft and right conflict, and analyzes the legal rules and application of the domestic entities of the United States and China, and the entity rules for the dispute between the domain name and the non-trademark. The fifth chapter discusses the dispute of the international domain name in detail. The balance of interests in the decision-making mechanism. The ICANN mechanism can meet the demand of interest balance in the process of the process, and realize the high efficiency and justice of the procedure; in the case of the entity, it is too focused on the protection of the trademark right and the domain The protection of the interests of the rights and interests is weak. The situation is the environment of the times, the limitation of knowledge and the specific interests. To strengthen the protection of the interests of the rights and interests of the domain, we should perfect the "trunk>" reverse domain name intrusi On " rule. The "Complainant man-made domain name and interest person" can be increased when the machine is mature China's expert adjudicative mechanism is very similar to the ICANN mechanism, and the protection of domain name rights and interests is also weak, so it is necessary to strengthen the mechanism construction in this respect. The real balance of the interests of the parties is the full-text content of the concluding remarks, and the central point of this paper is put forward in a clear way: the theory of interest balance should be used as an international domain name dispute resolution machine In general, the existing dispute settlement mechanism embodies the concept of interest balance better in terms of the process, but it is obviously more important to protect the interests of the traditional rights in terms of the entity, so it is not true The balance of interests between the parties is being maintained. Therefore, in the long run, it is necessary to balance the interests in the interest
【学位授予单位】：武汉大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：F49;D997

【参考文献】