从诚实信用原则角度分析南海仲裁案
发布时间：2019-07-09 07:04
【摘要】：诚实信用作为一项重要的法律原则,不仅在私法领域具有核心地位,在国际习惯、国际判例、国际条约中均有所体现,构成国际公法的一项基本原则。条约的实施需要诚信,条约当事方必须诚信遵守条约,履行条约中的义务。中国和菲律宾就南海问题签署、发表的联合声明、联合新闻公报等双边文件以及《南海宣言》等在性质上属于国际法中的条约,菲律宾应诚信履行,且仲裁庭2015年做出的《关于管辖权和可受理性问题的裁决》及2016年7月12日做出的《裁决书》对《南海宣言》定性有误。而且,作为《联合国海洋法公约》的缔约国,菲律宾没有按照《联合国海洋法公约》关于争端解决程序的规定,单方面将中菲南海争端提交至仲裁程序,违背诚实信用原则。
[Abstract]:As an important legal principle, good faith not only plays a core role in the field of private law, but also embodies it in international custom, international precedent and international treaties, which constitutes a basic principle of public international law. The implementation of the treaty requires good faith, and the parties to the treaty must abide by the treaty in good faith and fulfill their obligations under the treaty. Bilateral documents such as the signing, joint statement, joint press release and other bilateral documents on the South China Sea issue, as well as treaties such as the South China Sea Declaration, which belong to international law in nature, should be carried out in good faith by the Philippines, and the Arbitration Tribunal's ruling on jurisdiction and acceptability in 2015 and the award issued on July 12, 2016 are incorrect in the characterization of the South China Sea Declaration. Moreover, as a party to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, the Philippines has not unilaterally submitted the South China Sea dispute to arbitration proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on dispute settlement procedures, contrary to the principle of good faith.
【作者单位】： 大连海洋大学法学院/海警学院;
【分类号】：D993.5
本文编号：2511958
[Abstract]:As an important legal principle, good faith not only plays a core role in the field of private law, but also embodies it in international custom, international precedent and international treaties, which constitutes a basic principle of public international law. The implementation of the treaty requires good faith, and the parties to the treaty must abide by the treaty in good faith and fulfill their obligations under the treaty. Bilateral documents such as the signing, joint statement, joint press release and other bilateral documents on the South China Sea issue, as well as treaties such as the South China Sea Declaration, which belong to international law in nature, should be carried out in good faith by the Philippines, and the Arbitration Tribunal's ruling on jurisdiction and acceptability in 2015 and the award issued on July 12, 2016 are incorrect in the characterization of the South China Sea Declaration. Moreover, as a party to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, the Philippines has not unilaterally submitted the South China Sea dispute to arbitration proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on dispute settlement procedures, contrary to the principle of good faith.
【作者单位】： 大连海洋大学法学院/海警学院;
【分类号】：D993.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 向明华;;错误扣船归责比较研究[J];现代法学;2009年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 王一三;国际商事合同通则诚实信用原则研究[D];武汉大学;2005年
，本文编号：2511958
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2511958.html
