两种安全准则视域下的网络安全防卫权
发布时间：2019-08-08 17:31
【摘要】：《联合国宪章》明确规定了国家自卫权的适用条件,但在实践中,美国等西方强国对此并未严格遵守。由此在网络空间中出现了两种不同的安全准则:一是以美国为首的北约国家在《塔林手册》中提出对于所谓网络攻击威胁可以动用网络安全防卫权;另一是以中俄为代表的国家提出禁止网络攻击,坚决反对先发制人、预先防卫。由于美国在网络空间占有极强的技术优势,我国必须推动构建各层次的网络空间行为公约,提高网络空间预警和自卫能力,加强交流、增进互信以有效维护国家网络空间安全。
[Abstract]:The Charter of the United Nations clearly stipulates the applicable conditions of the right of national self-defense, but in practice, the United States and other western powers have not strictly complied with this. As a result, there are two different security norms in cyberspace: one is that NATO countries led by the United States propose in the Tallinn Manual that they can use the right of cyber security to defend against so-called cyber attack threats; the other is that countries represented by China and Russia propose to ban cyber attacks and resolutely oppose pre-emptive and pre-defense. Because the United States has a strong technical advantage in cyberspace, China must promote the construction of conventions on cyberspace behavior at all levels, improve the early warning and self-defense ability of cyberspace, strengthen exchanges, and enhance mutual trust in order to effectively maintain the security of national cyberspace.
【作者单位】： 国防科技大学人文与社会科学学院;
【分类号】：D99
[Abstract]:The Charter of the United Nations clearly stipulates the applicable conditions of the right of national self-defense, but in practice, the United States and other western powers have not strictly complied with this. As a result, there are two different security norms in cyberspace: one is that NATO countries led by the United States propose in the Tallinn Manual that they can use the right of cyber security to defend against so-called cyber attack threats; the other is that countries represented by China and Russia propose to ban cyber attacks and resolutely oppose pre-emptive and pre-defense. Because the United States has a strong technical advantage in cyberspace, China must promote the construction of conventions on cyberspace behavior at all levels, improve the early warning and self-defense ability of cyberspace, strengthen exchanges, and enhance mutual trust in order to effectively maintain the security of national cyberspace.
【作者单位】： 国防科技大学人文与社会科学学院;
【分类号】：D99
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 韩治国;关于特别防卫权的思考[J];河北法学;2002年01期
2 郭建坡;对新刑法设立无限防卫权的理性思考[J];河北法学;2002年05期
3 李成福;论无限防卫权[J];四川警官高等专科学校学报;2003年04期
4 崔静;对“无限防卫权”的理性思考[J];白城师范学院学报;2005年02期
5 郭冰;;警察防卫权之思辨[J];中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版);2006年01期
6 王国飞;;对特别防卫权的理性思考[J];科教文汇(上半月);2006年11期
7 李晓欧;;特殊防卫权若干问题探析[J];长春师范学院学报;2007年03期
8 常菲;;警察职务防卫权行使的正当性要素及原则[J];河南司法警官职业学院学报;2007年02期
9 周U喓，
本文编号：2524502
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2524502.html
