法院选择协议的性质之辩与制度展开

发布时间：2019-08-26 09:49

【摘要】：法院选择协议兼具合同因素和程序因素,在性质上是合同性质还是程序性质,是自由属性主导还是强制属性主导,不同的法律定性决定了不同的制度展开。目前的发展趋势是,限制合意自由的程序性质论渐受冷落,弘扬合意自由的合同性质论则渐受肯定。我国法律规定的"实际联系"要求,对于保护私人利益的立法目的难以成立,同时在专属管辖的领域之外,对于保护公共利益的立法目的是无必要的。法院选择协议的法律适用问题,可以融入涉外合同法律适用的一般原理之中,首先应尊重当事人的意思自治。为促进国际民商事争议解决方式的多元发展,各国法律应像支持仲裁协议那样支持法院选择协议。
[Abstract]:The court choice agreement has both the contract factor and the procedure factor, in the nature is the contract nature or the procedure nature, is the free attribute leading or the compulsory attribute leading, the different legal qualitative determines the different system to launch. The current development trend is that the procedural nature of restricting the freedom of consent is gradually ignored, while the theory of contractual quality, which promotes the freedom of agreement, is gradually affirmed. The requirement of "practical connection" stipulated in the law of our country is difficult to establish for the legislative purpose of protecting private interests, and outside the exclusive jurisdiction, it is unnecessary for the legislative purpose of protecting public interests. The application of the law of the court choice agreement can be integrated into the general principle of the application of the foreign contract law, first of all, the autonomy of the will of the parties should be respected. In order to promote the pluralistic development of international civil and commercial dispute resolution, the laws of various countries should support the court choice agreement just as they support the arbitration agreement.
【作者单位】：南京大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部一般项目“国际私法与法哲学思潮的互动”(项目批准号:09YJC820054)的阶段性成果南京大学985三期项目资助
【分类号】：D997;D925.1

【共引文献】