马约特岛的法律地位：法国的海外领地还是科摩罗的分离领土？
发布时间：2021-02-16 02:07
马约特岛是科摩罗群岛的四个岛屿之一,自从1975年科摩罗宣布包括马约特岛在内的四个岛屿独立以来,马约特岛一直是一个有争议性的问题。争议的焦点是关于马约特岛的主权问题,该岛屿由法国管理,而科摩罗声称对其拥有主权。事实上,在该群岛的非殖民化进程失败后,根据1974年12月22日组织的全民公决的投票结果,科摩罗于1975年7月6日单方面宣布四岛从法国独立。因此,法国决定承认部分群岛的独立:投票支持独立的四个岛屿中,有三个岛屿支持独立,第四个岛屿马约特岛,因为它在公投期间的反对票,仍然处于法国政府的管辖之下。2011年,法国决定将科摩罗马约特岛的地位转变为法国的海外领地,从而剥夺科摩罗的部分领土。理论上,当代的科摩罗是由四个岛屿组成的国家——联合国决议承认科摩罗领土由大科摩罗、昂儒昂、莫埃利和马约特四岛组成,但在实践中科摩罗在马约特岛的主权仍受限于其前殖民国家的影响,并在此意义上形成了关于马约特岛的领土争端。本文的目的是要详细分析马约特岛问题,以确定它在国际法上的法律地位。我们通过运用国际法原则和国家法律作为证据来清楚地表明,马约特岛构成了科摩罗国的完整部分,因此,它作为法国海外领地的地位是以...
【文章来源】：中南财经政法大学湖北省 211工程院校 教育部直属院校
【文章页数】：264 页
【学位级别】：博士
【文章目录】：
Abstract
摘要
Dedication
Acknowledgements
List of Abbreviations and Symbols
General Introduction
Part 1 : The Comorian people's right to self-determination
Chapter 1: The colonisation period of the archipelago of Comoros
1.1. The archipelago of Comoros under French protectorate regime
1.1.1. Establishment of the protectorate regime in Comoros
1.1.2. The contestation of the protectorate regime
1.2. The new status of Comoros:the French colony
1.2.1. The annexation Act and its scope
1.2.2. The contestation of the attachment
1.3. The internal autonomy of Comoros:the way to independence
1.3.1. The phase of the administrative and financial autonomy
1.3.2. The framework law of 1956
1.3.3. The Internal autonomy of Comoros
Chapter 2: Accession of Comoros into independence
2.1. General view of self-determination
2.1.1. Historical perspective of the right to self-determination
2.1.1.1. Self-determination before the First World War
2.1.1.2. Self-determination after the First World War
2.1.1.3. Self-determination under the international law jargon
2.1.1.3.1. Self-determination under aegis of articles 1 § 2 and 55 of the UNCharter
2.1.1.3.2. The UN General Assembly Resolutions 1514 （XV） and 1541（XV）
2.1.1.3.3. The International Covenants of 1966
2.1.1.3.4. The Declaration on Friendly Relations
2.1.1.3.5. The African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights
2.1.1.3.6. The Helsinki Final Act
2.1.1.3.7. The Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice
2.1.2. Different meanings and forms of self-determination
2.1.2.1. Self-determination: right or principle?
2.1.2.2. Different forms of the right of people to self-determination
2.1.2.2.1. External self-determination
2.1.2.2.2. Internal self-determination
2.2. Comoros' self-determination
2.2.1. The conditions to implement the right to self-determination in Comoros
2.2.1.1. The quality of Comorian people:the subjugated people
2.2.1.2. The colonial domination
2.2.2. The operation of self-determination of Comoros
2.2.2.1. The organisation of referendum of 22 December 1974
2.2.2.1.1. The political bases of self-determination in Comoros
2.2.2.1.2. The legal basis of self-determination referendum of Comoros
2.2.2.1.3. The popular consultation of 22 December 1974
2.2.3. The political and legal consequences of the self-determination referendumof 22 December 1974
2.2.3.1. The failure of the decolonisation process of Comoros caused by the Parliament
2.2.3.2. The unilateral declaration of independence of Comoros
2.3. The recognition of independence of Comoros
2.3.1. The recognition by the ex-colonial power
2.3.2. The recognition by the international community
Conclusion of the first part
Part 2: Mayotte:French Overseas Department or dismemberment of Comoros?
Chapter 3: Does the island of Mayotte have a separated right to self-determination?
3.1. Do wa maore comtitute people other than the people of Comoros?
3.2. Does the population of Mayotte have the right to refuse independence?
3.2.1. There is no right to refuse independence
3.2.2. Mayotte's theses against independence
3.2.2.1. The "realities" of Mayotte's attachment to France
3.2.2.2. The truth about Mayotte's attachment to France
Chapter 4: Scope and limits to the self-determination of Mayotte
4.1. Mayotte's right to self-determination is subject to the territorial integrity of Comoros
4.1.1. The principle of territorial integrity in international law
4.1.2. Wa maore's right to self-determination and the principle of the territorial integrity of Comoros
4.1.2.1. Self-determination of Comoros cannot be plural
4.1.2.2. Self-determination of Comoros involves the preservation of the territorial integrity of the Comorian overseas territory
4.2. The principle of the right of peoples to self-determination does not meansecession
4.3. The prohibition of the secession
4.3.1. The prohibition of secession in international law
4.3.2. The exception of the prohibition: the remedial secession
4.3.2.1. The constitutional right to secession
4.3.2.2. The remedial secession
4.3.3. International practice against secessions:the case of Comoros
Conclusion of the second part
Part 3: France's non-compliance with international law
Chapter 5: The violation by France of the Vienna Convention of the Law of Treaties of 1969
5.1. Violation of the Vienna Convention of 1969
5.1.1. The violation of article 26 of the Vienne Convention of 1969
5.1.1.1. Rule of good faith
5.1.1.2. The violation of the rule of good faith in the Comoros' self-determination process
5.1.2. The violation of article 27 of the Vienne Convention of 1969
5.2. The questionable position of France enshrined in the decision of 31 December 1975 on the self-determination of Comoros
5.2.1. Determination of the modalities for the implementation of article 53 of the France Constitution of 1958
5.2.2. The erroneous assertion of respect for international rules
Chapter 6: France's non-compliance with international law
6.1. France's violation of the principle of uti possidetis juris
6.1.1. The meaning of the principle of uti possidetis juris in international law
6.1.2. The principle of uti possidetis juris in the case of Comoros
6.2. Permanent interference in the internal affairs of Comoros by France
6.2.1. The meaning of the principle of uti possidetis juris in international law
6.2.2. Comoros' internal affairs violated by France
6.2.2.1. The mercenary phenomena in Comoros
6.2.2.2. The deportation of President SAID MOHAMED DJOHAR
6.2.2.3. The affair MOHAMED BACAR
Conclusion of the third part
Part 4: The way forward to settle the Franco-Comorian territorial dispute over Mayotte
Chapter 7: Sharing the sovereignty on Mayotte between Comoros and France:the condominium theory
7.1. The concept of condominium in international law
7.1.1. The general meaning of sovereignty in international law
7.1.2. The absolutism State sovereignty and its limits: the limitation of sovereignty and the sharing of sovereignty
7.1.3. Sharing sovereignty, an exceptional notion in international law:the condominium
7.2. Different perspectives of sharing sovereignty and competences
7.2.1. Comorian sovereignty, French administration
7.2.2. One sovereignty, two administrations
Chapter 8: The implication of the United Nations bodies to settle the Franco-Comorian territorial dispute over Mayotte
8.1. Request of an advisory opinion before International Court of Justice
8.2. Seizing the United Nations Security Council
8.3. Forum prorogatum
Conclusion of the fourth part
Part 5: General Conclusion & Recommendations
Chapter 9: Conclusion
Chapter 10: Recommendations
10.1. The Comorian government must have a strong national policy on thisquestion
10.2. Promoting the country's economic development
10.3. France's policy to be improved
Bibliography
Books & theses
Articles & newspaper column
Cited Cases
Treaties,Conventions and Declarations
Security Council Resolutions
General Assembly Resolutions
Organisation of African Unity and African Union Resolutions
National Constitutions, Domestic Legislations
Website
Annexe Ⅰ
本文编号：3035952
【文章来源】：中南财经政法大学湖北省 211工程院校 教育部直属院校
【文章页数】：264 页
【学位级别】：博士
【文章目录】：
Abstract
摘要
Dedication
Acknowledgements
List of Abbreviations and Symbols
General Introduction
Part 1 : The Comorian people's right to self-determination
Chapter 1: The colonisation period of the archipelago of Comoros
1.1. The archipelago of Comoros under French protectorate regime
1.1.1. Establishment of the protectorate regime in Comoros
1.1.2. The contestation of the protectorate regime
1.2. The new status of Comoros:the French colony
1.2.1. The annexation Act and its scope
1.2.2. The contestation of the attachment
1.3. The internal autonomy of Comoros:the way to independence
1.3.1. The phase of the administrative and financial autonomy
1.3.2. The framework law of 1956
1.3.3. The Internal autonomy of Comoros
Chapter 2: Accession of Comoros into independence
2.1. General view of self-determination
2.1.1. Historical perspective of the right to self-determination
2.1.1.1. Self-determination before the First World War
2.1.1.2. Self-determination after the First World War
2.1.1.3. Self-determination under the international law jargon
2.1.1.3.1. Self-determination under aegis of articles 1 § 2 and 55 of the UNCharter
2.1.1.3.2. The UN General Assembly Resolutions 1514 （XV） and 1541（XV）
2.1.1.3.3. The International Covenants of 1966
2.1.1.3.4. The Declaration on Friendly Relations
2.1.1.3.5. The African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights
2.1.1.3.6. The Helsinki Final Act
2.1.1.3.7. The Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice
2.1.2. Different meanings and forms of self-determination
2.1.2.1. Self-determination: right or principle?
2.1.2.2. Different forms of the right of people to self-determination
2.1.2.2.1. External self-determination
2.1.2.2.2. Internal self-determination
2.2. Comoros' self-determination
2.2.1. The conditions to implement the right to self-determination in Comoros
2.2.1.1. The quality of Comorian people:the subjugated people
2.2.1.2. The colonial domination
2.2.2. The operation of self-determination of Comoros
2.2.2.1. The organisation of referendum of 22 December 1974
2.2.2.1.1. The political bases of self-determination in Comoros
2.2.2.1.2. The legal basis of self-determination referendum of Comoros
2.2.2.1.3. The popular consultation of 22 December 1974
2.2.3. The political and legal consequences of the self-determination referendumof 22 December 1974
2.2.3.1. The failure of the decolonisation process of Comoros caused by the Parliament
2.2.3.2. The unilateral declaration of independence of Comoros
2.3. The recognition of independence of Comoros
2.3.1. The recognition by the ex-colonial power
2.3.2. The recognition by the international community
Conclusion of the first part
Part 2: Mayotte:French Overseas Department or dismemberment of Comoros?
Chapter 3: Does the island of Mayotte have a separated right to self-determination?
3.1. Do wa maore comtitute people other than the people of Comoros?
3.2. Does the population of Mayotte have the right to refuse independence?
3.2.1. There is no right to refuse independence
3.2.2. Mayotte's theses against independence
3.2.2.1. The "realities" of Mayotte's attachment to France
3.2.2.2. The truth about Mayotte's attachment to France
Chapter 4: Scope and limits to the self-determination of Mayotte
4.1. Mayotte's right to self-determination is subject to the territorial integrity of Comoros
4.1.1. The principle of territorial integrity in international law
4.1.2. Wa maore's right to self-determination and the principle of the territorial integrity of Comoros
4.1.2.1. Self-determination of Comoros cannot be plural
4.1.2.2. Self-determination of Comoros involves the preservation of the territorial integrity of the Comorian overseas territory
4.2. The principle of the right of peoples to self-determination does not meansecession
4.3. The prohibition of the secession
4.3.1. The prohibition of secession in international law
4.3.2. The exception of the prohibition: the remedial secession
4.3.2.1. The constitutional right to secession
4.3.2.2. The remedial secession
4.3.3. International practice against secessions:the case of Comoros
Conclusion of the second part
Part 3: France's non-compliance with international law
Chapter 5: The violation by France of the Vienna Convention of the Law of Treaties of 1969
5.1. Violation of the Vienna Convention of 1969
5.1.1. The violation of article 26 of the Vienne Convention of 1969
5.1.1.1. Rule of good faith
5.1.1.2. The violation of the rule of good faith in the Comoros' self-determination process
5.1.2. The violation of article 27 of the Vienne Convention of 1969
5.2. The questionable position of France enshrined in the decision of 31 December 1975 on the self-determination of Comoros
5.2.1. Determination of the modalities for the implementation of article 53 of the France Constitution of 1958
5.2.2. The erroneous assertion of respect for international rules
Chapter 6: France's non-compliance with international law
6.1. France's violation of the principle of uti possidetis juris
6.1.1. The meaning of the principle of uti possidetis juris in international law
6.1.2. The principle of uti possidetis juris in the case of Comoros
6.2. Permanent interference in the internal affairs of Comoros by France
6.2.1. The meaning of the principle of uti possidetis juris in international law
6.2.2. Comoros' internal affairs violated by France
6.2.2.1. The mercenary phenomena in Comoros
6.2.2.2. The deportation of President SAID MOHAMED DJOHAR
6.2.2.3. The affair MOHAMED BACAR
Conclusion of the third part
Part 4: The way forward to settle the Franco-Comorian territorial dispute over Mayotte
Chapter 7: Sharing the sovereignty on Mayotte between Comoros and France:the condominium theory
7.1. The concept of condominium in international law
7.1.1. The general meaning of sovereignty in international law
7.1.2. The absolutism State sovereignty and its limits: the limitation of sovereignty and the sharing of sovereignty
7.1.3. Sharing sovereignty, an exceptional notion in international law:the condominium
7.2. Different perspectives of sharing sovereignty and competences
7.2.1. Comorian sovereignty, French administration
7.2.2. One sovereignty, two administrations
Chapter 8: The implication of the United Nations bodies to settle the Franco-Comorian territorial dispute over Mayotte
8.1. Request of an advisory opinion before International Court of Justice
8.2. Seizing the United Nations Security Council
8.3. Forum prorogatum
Conclusion of the fourth part
Part 5: General Conclusion & Recommendations
Chapter 9: Conclusion
Chapter 10: Recommendations
10.1. The Comorian government must have a strong national policy on thisquestion
10.2. Promoting the country's economic development
10.3. France's policy to be improved
Bibliography
Books & theses
Articles & newspaper column
Cited Cases
Treaties,Conventions and Declarations
Security Council Resolutions
General Assembly Resolutions
Organisation of African Unity and African Union Resolutions
National Constitutions, Domestic Legislations
Website
Annexe Ⅰ
本文编号：3035952
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/3035952.html
