论《中华人民共和国合同法》第64条的定性与解释——兼与“利他合同论”商榷

发布时间：2018-02-10 10:13

本文关键词： 利他合同向第三人履行的合同第三人合同履行直接履行请求权　出处：《法商研究》2010年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】："利他合同"与"向第三人履行的合同"在法学术语体系中是两项存在根本差别的制度,不能混淆。前者是指基于债权人和债务人的约定向第三人履行,并且赋予第三人针对债务人以直接履行请求权的合同,它在性质上是结合了两次具有法律意义的财产变动的合同,属于合同效力相对性原则的例外;而后者是合同的一种特殊履行方式,在其中只实现了一次具有法律意义的财产变动。《中华人民共和国合同法》第64条所规范的合同类型,应该界定为向第三人履行的合同,而不是利他合同。
[Abstract]:"altruistic contract" and "contract performed to a third party" are two fundamentally different systems in the legal terminology system, the former refers to the performance to the third party on the basis of the agreement between the creditor and the debtor. The third party is endowed with the contract of direct performance of the right of claim against the debtor, which in nature is a contract which combines two changes of property with legal significance, and belongs to the exception of the principle of relativity of contract effectiveness. The latter is a special way of performing a contract, in which only one change of property of legal significance has been realized. The type of contract regulated in Article 64 of the contract Law of the people's Republic of China should be defined as a contract to be performed to a third party. Not altruistic contracts.
【作者单位】：北京大学法学院;
【基金】：司法部国家法治与法学理论研究资助项目(07SFB3023)
【分类号】：D923.6

【参考文献】