浅析旅游合同相关法律问题

发布时间：2018-03-08 23:03

本文选题：旅游合同　切入点：旅游合同性质　出处：《上海社会科学院》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：伴随着国内旅游行业的迅猛发展,各式各样旅游合同纠纷也逐渐增多,但相较于我国世界第三的旅游大国地位,国内关于旅游方面的法治发展却不尽如人意。目前,2010年最高人民法院审判委员会通过的《关于审理旅游纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的规定》,是现阶段最具有权威性的司法解释。此外,《旅行社条例》、《旅行社服务质量赔偿标准》等,是我国现有的关于旅游方面较为完备的法规。综上所述,我国现阶段尚无旅游方面的专项立法,司法实践中在处理旅游合同纠纷时,多参照现行《中华人民共和国民法通则》及《中华人民共和国合同法》的相关规定处理,缺少统一的标准。很明显国内在旅游立法方面的发展远远不及旅游行业前进之速度,这就自然而然的要求我们给予旅游合同相关问题更多的关注,本文通过对美国、英国、德国、日本及我国台湾地区旅游立法现状及司法实践的介绍,结合我国理论、立法及司法实务的现实情况,重点对旅游合同概念、旅游合同特征、旅游合同法律关系性质、旅游合同法律责任及旅游合同违约精神损害赔偿等方面问题进行探讨。本文除引言和结束语外,共分为三个部分：第一章是旅游合同法律关系性质,共分三节。第一节是旅游及旅游合同的概念,通过介绍世界其他国家或地区,关于旅游及旅游合同的各种观点,析出笔者对旅游合同的定义；第二节是旅游合同的特征,主要从旅游合同应具备的一般合同特征和专有特征两方面进行讨论；第三节是旅游合同法律关系性质,提出了委托合同说、承揽合同说、行纪合同说、居间合同说及混合合同说等五种主要的旅游合同性质说,且分别与旅游合同进行对比分析,阐述笔者对于旅游合同法律关系性质的认识。第二章是旅游合同法律责任,共分三节。第一节是旅游合同缔约过失责任,主要讨论了满足旅游合同缔约过失责任的条件、可能造成承担缔约过失的情形及缔约过失赔偿范围的界定；第二节是旅游合同侵权责任,通过结合司法实例,主要论述了旅游经营者、旅游辅助者及第三人等三类主体的侵权责任；第三节是旅游合同违约责任,本节是第二章论述的重点,与司法实务相结合,重点阐述了旅游合同违约责任的特征、构成要件、免责事由、承担责任的方式以及旅游合同违约责任与缔约过失责任和侵权责任的区别。第三章是旅游合同违约责任的非财产损害赔偿,共分三节。第一节是旅游合同违约责任中非财产损害赔偿的可行性和必要性；第二节是旅游合同时间浪费之损害赔偿,通过介绍国内外立法及司法实践,主要讨论了时间浪费的认定和时间浪费的赔偿标准方面问题；第三节是旅游合同违约精神损害赔偿,通过对比世界各国或地区关于旅游合同精神损害赔偿立法现状及司法实践,阐述我国构建旅游合同违约责任非财产损害赔偿的该该意的问题。鉴于旅游合同自身的特殊性,其很难参照我国现有合同理论解决有关问题,故而旅游合同立法势在必行。本文中,笔者对上述所涉及问题,进行了一些尝试性的探讨,在个别问题上阐述了自己的观点,以期为旅游合同法律制度的构建略尽绵薄之力。
[Abstract]:Along with the rapid development of domestic tourism industry, every kind of tourism contract dispute also gradually increased, but compared to China's third world tourism power, domestic law on tourism development is not satisfactory. At present, in 2010 the Supreme People's Court of the judicial committee of the "some issues concerning the application of law provisions on the trial of tourist dispute cases. At the present stage is the judicial interpretation of the most authoritative travel regulations. In addition, < >, < > travel service quality standard of compensation, is China's existing on tourism comprehensive regulations. To sum up, the special legislation of our country at this stage there is no tourism, in the judicial practice in dealing with disputes the travel contract, the relevant provisions of the general principles of the civil law of People's Republic of China refer to < > and < > the People's Republic of China contract law, the lack of uniform standards. Obviously our inner journey The development of tourism legislation is far less than the speed of the tourism industry forward, which naturally requires us to give more attention to issues related to the travel contract, according to the United States, Britain, Germany, Japan and Taiwan of China tourism legislation and judicial practice are introduced, combined with China's reality of theory, legislation and judicial practice the key concept of tourism contract, characteristics of travel contract, tourism contract legal relationship nature, questions of compensation for travel contract legal responsibility and moral damage in breach of travel contract are discussed.
Apart from the introduction and the concluding remarks, this article is divided into three parts:
The first chapter is the legal relationship between the travel contract, is divided into three sections. The first section is the concept of tourism and tourism contract, through the introduction of other countries or regions of the world, various views on tourism and tourism contract, the precipitation of the travel contract is defined; the second section is the features of tourism contract, to discuss the two aspects of the general characteristics of the contract and proprietary features mainly from the travel contract should have; the third section is the legal relationship between the travel contract, the contract, work contract, contract of commission, brokerage contract and mixed contract and other five kinds of travel contract should be said, and the travel contract carries on the contrast analysis, elaborated the author to understanding the nature of the legal relationship of tourism contract.
The second chapter is the legal responsibility of the travel contract, is divided into three sections. The first section is the travel contract liability, mainly discusses the tourism contract meet the liability for contracting negligence may cause the condition, scope of compensation and Culpa in contract negligence; the second section is the travel contract tort liability, by combining judicial examples, mainly the tour operators, tourism auxiliary tort liability and three people in three main categories; the third section is the liability for breach of tourism contract, this section is the focus of the second chapter, combined with judicial practice, focusing on the features of tourism contract breach liability elements, exemption, difference and liability for breach of contract contracting negligence liability and tort liability of liability and the travel contract.
The third chapter is the non property damage compensation for breach of contract, is divided into three sections. The first section is the liability for breach of tourism contract in non property damage compensation of the necessity and feasibility; damage to the second day is the time wasted travel contract compensation, through the introduction of domestic and foreign legislation and judicial practice, mainly discusses the identification and waste of time waste compensation standard; the third section is the tourism spirit of breach of contract damages, compared with other countries and regions in the world about the travel contract damages the spirit of legislation and judicial practice, the meaning of the problem on China's construction of breach of contract compensation for non pecuniary damage.
In view of the special nature of the tourism contract itself, it is difficult to refer to our country existing contract theory to solve the problem, so the travel contract legislation is imperative. In this paper, the author of the issues involved, made some tentative study on individual issues on their views, in order to build the legal system of tourism contract Mianbaozhili.

【学位授予单位】：上海社会科学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.6

【参考文献】