侵犯商业秘密罪案研究

发布时间：2018-03-12 13:18

本文选题：商业秘密　切入点：侵犯商业秘密罪　出处：《黑龙江大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：商业秘密作为一种能为权利人带来经济利益和竞争优势的无形财产，其重要性日益明显，侵犯商业秘密的行为已经蔓延到经济活动的各个方面，同时不仅是对相关权利人的侵害，也是对国家经济安全的威胁。因此,刑事保护商业秘密已经成为一种必要手段。美国和中国分别于1996年和1997年通过刑事立法将侵犯商业秘密的行为进行犯罪化,也说明中美两国在对商业秘密保护上的相同的价值判断。本文通过力拓侵犯商业秘密罪案和钟东凡经济间谍罪案的对比作为出发点，结合中美侵犯商业秘密罪的立法比较，提出完善我国商业秘密刑事保护的一些建议。文章共分为三个部分，第一部分是对两个典型案例事实的介绍，简要阐述有关侵犯商业秘密所引发的问题，为下文的论述做铺垫。第二部分从我国和美国保护商业秘密的刑事立法角度，结合案例引发的问题，分别从以下方面进行论述：首先，从商业秘密保护的理论出发，由合同法理论到侵权法理论最终上升到财产权理论，奠定了商业秘密刑事保护的基础；其次，对商业秘密的特征进行比较，，我国与美国商业秘密的主要区别在于对实用性的有无的规定上；再次，对本罪的入罪标准进行分析，美国采用的是定性入罪模式，而我国是采用既定量又定性的入罪模式。最后，在罪名设置和罪刑配置上进行比较研究，从而看出我国侵犯商业秘密罪的立法现状与美国的差距。第三部分结合案例和上述的关于两国在商业秘密刑事保护中存在的差异，提出完善我国商业秘密的刑事保护建议。主要从商业秘密的特征、“重大损失”认定的标准上、罪名的设置和刑罚的配置上提出完善的建议。
[Abstract]:As a kind of intangible property which can bring economic benefits and competitive advantages to the obligee, the importance of trade secret is becoming more and more obvious, and the infringement of trade secret has spread to all aspects of economic activities. At the same time, it is not only an infringement on the relevant right holders, but also a threat to the national economic security. Criminal protection of trade secrets has become a necessary means. The United States and China passed criminal legislation on 1996 and 1997 respectively to criminalize violations of trade secrets. It also shows that China and the United States have the same value judgment on the protection of trade secrets. Through the comparison between Rio Tinto's crime of infringing trade secrets and Zhong Dongfan's crime of economic espionage, this paper combines the legislative comparison between China and the United States on the crime of infringing on trade secrets. Some suggestions are put forward to improve the criminal protection of trade secrets in China. The article is divided into three parts. The first part introduces the facts of two typical cases and briefly expounds the problems caused by the violation of trade secrets. In the second part, from the angle of criminal legislation of protecting trade secret in our country and the United States, combined with the problems caused by the case, respectively, the following aspects are discussed: first, from the theory of trade secret protection, From the theory of contract law to the theory of tort law, it finally rises to the theory of property right, which lays the foundation for the criminal protection of trade secret. Secondly, the characteristics of trade secret are compared. The main difference between our country and the United States lies in the practical provisions. Thirdly, after analyzing the standard of this crime, the United States adopts the mode of qualitative incrimination. In our country, both quantitative and qualitative patterns of incrimination are adopted. Finally, a comparative study is carried out on the establishment of charges and the allocation of crime and punishment. The third part combines the case and the above differences between the two countries in the criminal protection of trade secrets. The author puts forward some suggestions to improve the criminal protection of trade secrets in China, mainly from the aspects of the characteristics of trade secrets, the criteria for the determination of "heavy losses", the setting of charges and the allocation of penalties.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】