“验收合格”与“合同合法”意义之辨析

发布时间：2018-03-23 01:19

本文选题：无效建筑合同　切入点：无资质或超越资质合同　出处：《商场现代化》2006年17期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：长期以来,我国建筑工程市场一直存在着施工企业资质不足、施工管理秩序混乱、司法审理缺乏针对性法律文件、部分疑难案件难以定论等缺陷,这其中无效合同的管理及审理是一个关键性的问题。去年最高人民法院出台了《关于审理建设工程施工合同纠纷案件适用法律问题的解释》,为我国各级人民法院审理该类案件提供了具体明确的司法依据,客观上缓解了因法律规定不明导致部分疑难案件难以定论的现象。然而,《解释》中的个别条款(如第二条)却独具歧意,与以往《民法通则》、《合同法》的规定以及法院和仲裁机构以前的处理原则出现较大区别。本文着重就《解释》第二条涉及的一些问题提出质疑。
[Abstract]:For a long time, the construction engineering market in our country has many defects, such as insufficient qualification of construction enterprises, confusion of construction management order, lack of pertinent legal documents in judicial proceedings, difficulty in determining some difficult cases, and so on. The administration and trial of invalid contracts is a key issue. Last year, the Supreme people's Court issued the interpretation of the legal issues applicable to the trial of disputes over construction contracts, which is for the people's courts at all levels in our country. The trial of such cases provides a specific and clear basis for the administration of justice. Objectively alleviates the inconclusive phenomenon of some difficult cases caused by unclear legal provisions. However, some of the articles in the interpretation (such as Article 2) have different meanings. There is a great difference between the provisions of the General principles of Civil Law and the contract Law and the previous principles of the courts and arbitration institutions. This paper puts emphasis on questioning some problems involved in Article 2 of the interpretation.
【作者单位】：
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】