构造与出路:中国法上的同时履行抗辩权

发布时间：2018-03-30 23:02

本文选题：同时履行抗辩权　切入点：双务合同　出处：《中国社会科学》2005年03期

【摘要】：中国《合同法》一般性地承认了同时履行抗辩权,其发生虽不要求履行障碍须达到一定的严重程度,其行使却须受诚信原则的支配。对于履行期自始不同,而后履行一方债务亦届履行期场合能否发生同时履行抗辩权,存在法律漏洞,解释上宜有条件地肯定同时履行抗辩权。同时履行抗辩权的效力宜区分存在的效力与行使的效力,在履行迟延问题上,对于同时履行抗辩权宜采存在效果说。针对不完全履行场合的同时履行抗辩权,《合同法》表现出相当的灵活性。同时履行抗辩权具有诉讼经济的功能,但中国民事诉讼法欠缺“同时履行的判决”方式,从而构成影响该抗辩权功能发挥的重要因素。
[Abstract]:The Chinese contract Law generally recognizes the right of defense of simultaneous performance. Although its occurrence does not require that the obstacle to performance must reach a certain degree of severity, its exercise must be governed by the principle of good faith, and the period of performance is different from the beginning. Then whether or not the right of defense of simultaneous performance can occur on the occasion of the performance of one party's debt at the same time, there is a legal loophole, it is advisable to confirm the right of defense at the same time, and the validity of the right of simultaneously performing the defense should be distinguished from the validity of the existence of the right of defense and the effect of exercise. On the issue of delay in performance, the existence effect of concurrent performance of defense is stated. In view of the situation of incomplete performance, the contract Law shows considerable flexibility. At the same time, the right of defense has the economic function of litigation. However, China's civil procedure law lacks the "simultaneous execution of judgment" mode, thus forming an important factor that affects the function of the defense right.
【作者单位】：清华大学法学院
【基金】：国家社科基金项目《履行障碍与合同救济》(03BFX017)课题资助
【分类号】：D923.6

【参考文献】