善意取得制度体系瑕疵祛除的拟制论解释——以善意取得中间法律效果的提出为核心

发布时间：2018-04-04 22:02

本文选题：善意取得　切入点：无权处分　出处：《政治与法律》2017年01期

【摘要】：善意取得本质上乃立法者拟制第三人主观上具有善意因素的瑕疵交易能够如有权处分一般,发生终局性物权变动法律后果的法律制度。仅将善意取得视为原始取得并将善意取得的原因定位为法律的强行性规定,无法祛除善意取得嗣后所产生的体系瑕疵。善意取得系一项法律拟制,故而应明晰善意取得之法权原型为有权处分,并在此基础上,通过阶层式的法解释运作,令善意取得能够获得与有权处分相同的法律原因与法律后果,从而祛除拟制所带来的异质性因素,消除我国《物权法》第106条与我国《合同法》第51条之间可能产生的体系瑕疵,使善意取得发生之后的善意第三人亦可向无处分权人主张违约责任,最终使善意第三人的交易型法益获得合理而周全的保护。
[Abstract]:In essence, bona fide acquisition is a legal system in which the legislator makes the defective transaction with the third party's subjective bona fide factor capable of having the legal consequences of the final real right change as the right to dispose.Only considering bona fide acquisition as original acquisition and positioning the reason of bona fide acquisition as the mandatory stipulation of law can not dispel the defects of the system produced by bona fide acquisition later.The bona fide acquisition is a legal fiction, so it should be clear that the prototype of the legal right acquired in good faith is the disposition of the right, and on this basis, through the hierarchical interpretation of the operation of the law,To enable bona fide acquisition to obtain the same legal reasons and legal consequences as the right to dispose of, thereby removing the heterogeneity of fictitious factors,In order to eliminate the system defects that may arise between Article 106 of the Real right Law of China and Article 51 of the contract Law of China, the bona fide third party after the acquisition of bona fide can also claim the liability for breach of contract from the person with nowhere to share the power.Finally, the third party of bona fide transaction of legal interests to obtain reasonable and comprehensive protection.
【作者单位】：重庆大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923.2

【相似文献】