龚某盗卖其父房产一案的法律思考
发布时间:2018-04-09 21:30
本文选题:刑民交叉 切入点:盗窃罪 出处:《兰州大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:法律部门的分类乃是采用归纳的方式,根据社会生活中相似问题的处理方式所整理形成的具有普遍指导意义的理论体系,但在司法实践中的情形可能比理论上的研究要更加复杂,一个案件中可能存在一定的民事关系,同时又疑似符合刑法中的有关规定,且民事关系与刑事关系间相互影响与交叉,具有不可分割的牵连关系。 本文以“龚某盗卖其父房产”一案为引,提炼出本案涉及的法律关系,明确其争议焦点,继而从争议的焦点出发,讨论相关的理论基础与法律知识,运用刑法中有关合同诈骗罪,盗窃罪,不动产问题的处理方法等基础理论,以及民法中的合同法规定,善意取得,表见代理的相关理论,共同对此案进行剖析与研究,以处理不同部门法间的交叉问题,协调法律内部的逻辑性。 本文的研究分为以下几个部分: 第一部分:对“龚某盗卖其父房产”案进行全面的介绍,提炼本案涉及的法律关系,找出争议焦点。 第二部分:结合本案的争议焦点,运用刑法与民法的相关理论与规定,进行主要观点综述及法理评析。 第三部分:分析关于本案的刑民关系的法律适用问题,继而分析我国民刑交叉案件的调处模式的特点及其缺陷,继而提出对民刑交叉案件的调处模式重构应从理念重构和制度重构两方面进行着手。
[Abstract]:The classification of legal departments is a theoretical system of universal guiding significance formed by means of induction and according to the treatment of similar problems in social life.However, the situation in judicial practice may be more complicated than the theoretical research. In a case, there may be a certain civil relationship, and at the same time, it is suspected that it conforms to the relevant provisions of the criminal law, and the relationship between civil and criminal affects and intersects each other.Have an inseparable relationship.Based on the case of Gong stealing and selling his father's real estate, this paper abstracts the legal relationship involved in this case, clarifies its dispute focus, and then discusses the relevant theoretical basis and legal knowledge from the point of view of the controversy.Using the basic theories of the criminal law on the crime of contract fraud, theft, real estate and other basic theories, as well as the relevant theories of contract law in civil law, acquisition in good faith, apparent agency, and so on, the case is analyzed and studied together.In order to deal with the intersection between different branches of law, to coordinate the internal logic of the law.The research of this paper is divided into the following parts:The first part: a comprehensive introduction to the case of Gong stealing and selling his father's real estate, refining the legal relationship involved in the case and finding out the focus of the dispute.The second part: combined with the focus of the dispute in this case, using the relevant theories and regulations of criminal law and civil law, the main points of view and legal theory analysis.The third part analyzes the legal application of the criminal and civil relations in this case, and then analyzes the characteristics and defects of the mode of mediation of the cross-national criminal cases.Then it puts forward that the reconstruction of mediation mode of civil and criminal cases should be carried out from two aspects: concept reconstruction and system reconstruction.
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D924.3;D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 游伟;;刑民关系与我国的刑事法实践[J];华东刑事司法评论;2006年00期
2 王利明;;不动产善意取得的构成要件研究[J];政治与法律;2008年10期
3 尹晓静;;财产犯罪中的非法占有目的之否定——“侵害占有、建立占有”客观分析之提倡[J];政治与法律;2011年11期
4 吴加明;;合同诈骗罪与表见代理之共存及其释论——一起盗卖房屋案引发的刑民冲突及释论[J];政治与法律;2011年11期
5 杨兴培;;龚某盗卖其父房产一案之我见——兼谈不动产可以成为盗窃罪之对象[J];政治与法律;2012年03期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 清华大学法学院教授、博士生导师 张明楷;[N];人民法院报;2006年
2 清华大学法学院教授、博士生导师 张明楷;[N];人民法院报;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 张楚涛;盗窃罪司法认定中若干疑难问题研究[D];复旦大学;2008年
2 伍跃华;论民刑交叉案件的司法调处模式[D];湘潭大学;2009年
3 赵乔莉;合同诈骗罪的三个疑难问题研究[D];上海交通大学;2010年
,本文编号:1728231
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/1728231.html