建设工程合同并入承揽合同是契约精神的理性回归

发布时间：2018-04-10 17:25

本文选题：建设工程合同 + 承揽合同　；参考：《学术交流》2010年11期

【摘要】：建设工程合同是计划经济的产物,市场经济要求对其规制符合意思自治和法治原则,应当将建设工程合同并入承揽合同,理性回归契约精神。私法自治和国家强制之间具有天然的鸿沟,国家强制主要体现为法律管制,无论是大陆法系国家还是英美法系国家,违反法律之强制性规定均不完全导致合同无效,其在立法和司法中均有大量例外,以最大限度地维持私法自治。建设工程合同的主体、缔约方式、转分包、合同变更和转让、任意解除权、承包人留置权等制度,合同法均不应规定有别于一般承揽合同的特别限制。契约自由并不排斥政府对建设工程进行适当有效的管制,这些管制通常属于取缔性规定,而不属于效力性规定,应受行政法调整,与合同的效力无关。
[Abstract]:The construction project contract is the product of planned economy. The market economy demands that its regulation accord with the principle of autonomy of will and rule by law. The contract of construction project should be incorporated into the contract of contract and the spirit of contract should be returned rationally.There is a natural gap between the autonomy of private law and state coercion, which is mainly embodied in legal control. Whether in civil law countries or in common law countries, the violation of the mandatory provisions of the law does not completely lead to the invalidation of contracts.There are a lot of exceptions in legislation and judicature in order to maintain the autonomy of private law to the maximum extent.The contract law should not stipulate any special restriction different from the general contract of contract, such as the subject, the way of contracting, the subcontract, the change and transfer of the contract, the right of arbitrary rescission, the right of lien of the contractor and so on.The freedom of contract does not exclude the government from exercising proper and effective control over construction projects. These controls are usually proscribed regulations, but not provisions of validity, which should be adjusted by administrative law and have nothing to do with the validity of contracts.
【作者单位】：北京建筑工程学院法律系;
【分类号】：D923.6

【参考文献】