试论无权处分合同之效力

发布时间：2018-04-23 07:26

本文选题：无权处分 + 合同效力　；参考：《华东政法大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：无权处分是民法上一个较为复杂的法律概念，从表面上看其直接涉及到至少三方当事人的直接利益，从法理看上又与物权转移制度、善意取得制度、第三人信赖利益以及社会交易安全密切相关。正是因为无权处分问题的多角度性和复杂性，关于无权处分合同效力的判断也存在多种学术主张，不同国家和地区的法律规定也存在较大的不同。正是在这种大背景下，笔者试图主要从合同法和物权法法律制度目的的分析来探寻无权处分合同的法律效力，以寻求最合理的法律制度构建。纵观其他国家和地区关于无权处分合同效力法律规定的历史可以发现认定无权处分合同效力为有效成为许多国家和地区最终的选择。而从理论上分析，，认定无权处分合同效力为有效也能够在法理上自圆其说。虽然目前学术界对该问题的判断仍然存在一定的争议，但笔者认为，这些争义产生的根源事实上在于合同法理论和物权法理论上一些问题的界定不清晰和理论混淆，只有将这合同和物权这两个密切相关且能相互配合的制度清晰地辨析区分开来，才能真正合理地判断无权处分合同的效力应该如何进行法律定性。本文笔者拟用四部分进行论述。对第一部分将对本文论述的主题即无权处分合同效力的概念进行分析界定，主要针对德国法上处分行为和负担行为的区分进行论述，同时通过我国的法律和司法解释规定比较引出本文将要论述的中心问题。第二部分对世界上其他国家和地区关于无权处分合同效力的法律规定进行列举阐述，并对世界上各个国家和地区不同的法律规定从法律逻辑上进行分析，以便进行比较法研究。第三部分主要从物权和合同的这两个法律制度的法理上进行阐述，在不同的物权变动模式下，需要不同的合同制度与物权制度相互配合，物权方面就三大物权变动体系的法律内涵进行较为详细的论述，而合同制度方面主要从合同法法律原则、立法目的上进行论述，以便清晰区分物权法律制度和合同法律制度的不同要求，进而得出在法理上能够自圆其说的结论，即无权处分合同的效力依据法理应为有效。第四部分将结合善意取得制度论述本文结论在实践中对各方利益主体的权利义务的影响，以进一步论证本文结论的合理性和可操作性。
[Abstract]:Unauthorized disposition is a complicated legal concept in civil law. On the surface, it is directly related to the direct interests of at least three parties, and from the point of view of legal theory, it is also related to the system of transfer of real right and the system of acquisition in good faith. Third party trust interest and social transaction security are closely related. It is precisely because of the multi-angle and complexity of the unauthorized disposition that there are many academic opinions on the judgment of the validity of the unauthorized disposition contract, and the legal provisions of different countries and regions are also quite different. It is under this background that the author tries to explore the legal effect of the unauthorized disposition contract mainly from the analysis of the purpose of the contract law and the legal system of the real right law in order to seek the most reasonable legal system construction. Throughout the history of other countries and regions about the legal provisions of the validity of unauthorized disposition contracts, it can be found that the validity of unauthorized disposition contracts has become the final choice of many countries and regions. From the theoretical analysis, the validity of the unauthorized disposition contract can be justified in legal theory. Although there are still some controversies on the judgment of this issue in academic circles, the author thinks that the origin of these disputes lies in the unclear definition and confusion of some problems in the theory of contract law and the theory of real right law. Only by distinguishing the contract from the real right, which are closely related and can cooperate with each other, can the validity of the contract of unauthorized disposition be judged by law. The author intends to use four parts to discuss. The first part will analyze and define the concept of the validity of the contract of unauthorized disposition, which is the main theme of this article, mainly focusing on the distinction between the disposition act and the burden act in German law. At the same time, through the comparison of our legal and judicial interpretation regulations, this paper will discuss the central issues. In the second part, the author enumerates the legal provisions about the validity of unauthorized disposition contracts in other countries and regions in the world, and analyzes the different legal provisions of different countries and regions in the world from the legal logic, in order to carry on the comparative law research. The third part mainly from the real right and the contract of these two legal systems of the legal theory, in the different real right change mode, needs the different contract system and the real right system to cooperate with each other, In the aspect of real right, the legal connotation of the three major real right alteration systems is discussed in detail, while the contract system is mainly discussed from the legal principle of contract law and the legislative purpose. In order to clearly distinguish the different requirements of the legal system of real right and the legal system of contract, we can draw the conclusion that the validity of the contract of unauthorized disposition should be valid according to the legal principle. The fourth part will discuss the influence of the conclusion on the rights and obligations of the parties in practice, in order to further demonstrate the rationality and operability of the conclusion.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.6

【参考文献】