论无效合同的诉讼时效适用
发布时间:2018-06-07 09:43
本文选题:无效合同 + 诉讼时效 ; 参考:《苏州大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:无效合同的诉讼时效适用问题一直都是理论界和实务界争议较大的问题。争议的焦点是诉讼实效制度是否应当适用于无效合同的确认,合同被确认无效之后产生的相关请求权是否应当适用诉讼时效制度。如果适用,诉讼时效期间怎么计算。我国《合同法》及相关的司法解释都没有对这些问题做出明确的规定,然而我国法学界也未能对这些问题形成统一的认识,从而导致同类的案件在不同的法官的审理下产生截然相反的结果。本文在阐述我国目前实务界和理论界对无效合同确认是否适用诉讼时效问题的不同观点并进行评析之后,笔者提出自己的观点,即无效合同确认适用诉讼时效制度。笔者从法律的秩序与正义价值选择、法经济学原理、诉讼时效的客体三个方面论证了无效合同确认应当适用诉讼时效制度。合同被确认无效之后会产生返还财产、赔偿损失等请求权,赔偿损失产生于缔约过失责任,,属于债权请求权,理所当然适用诉讼时效制度。而返还财产请求权,笔者认为应区别动产与登记的不动产和未登记的不动产不同情况而确定是否适用诉讼时效。无效合同的确认的诉讼时效期间应从合同履行期限届满计算,没有约定履行期且不能确定履行期的,从权利人第一次主张权利而义务人拒绝时起算。无效合同被确认无效之后,所有物返还请求权和赔偿损失的请求权时效期间应当从合同被确认无效时计算。
[Abstract]:The problem of the application of the limitation of action in an invalid contract has always been a controversial issue in the theoretical and practical circles. The focus of the dispute is whether the litigation effectiveness system should be applied to the confirmation of the invalid contract. Whether the relevant claim should be applicable after the confirmation of the contract has been invalid. If it is applicable, what is the period of the limitation of action Our country's law circles have not made a clear understanding of these issues, but the law circles in our country have failed to form a unified understanding of these problems, which leads to the opposite results of the similar cases under the trial of different judges. After the different views on the validity of an invalid contract to confirm the validity of the limitation of action, the author puts forward his own view, that is, the application of the system of limitation of action in the confirmation of invalid contracts. The author argues that the confirmation of the invalid contract should be applicable from three aspects of the order of the law and the choice of the value of justice, the principle of law and economics and the object of the limitation of action. The system of the limitation of first instance. After the contract is confirmed to be invalid, it will produce the return of property, compensation for the claim, and the loss of the loss arising from the liability for fault in the contracting parties, which belongs to the claim of claim, and, of course, applies the system of limitation of action. To determine whether or not the limitation of limitation of action applies. The period of limitation of action for the confirmation of an invalid contract shall be calculated from the expiration of the expiration of the term of performance of the contract, without an agreement on the period of performance and that the period of performance cannot be determined, from the time when the right holder first claims the right and the obligee refuses it. After the invalid contract is confirmed to be invalid, the claim and the compensation for the loss of the property are returned. The time limit for the right of claim shall be calculated from the time when the contract is confirmed invalid.
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D923.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 邹海林;不当得利请求权与其他请求权的竞合[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);2000年01期
2 方一青;;无效合同认定适用诉讼时效之思辨[J];法制与社会;2010年02期
3 庞小菊;无效合同的诉讼时效问题刍议[J];广西政法管理干部学院学报;2002年03期
4 张耕;邓宏光;;无效合同性质之反思与重构[J];求索;2006年02期
5 王利明;关于无效合同确认的若干问题[J];法制与社会发展;2002年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 孟晋;论无效合同与诉讼时效的适用[D];吉林大学;2006年
2 陆晓燕;论诉讼时效的适用范围[D];华东政法学院;2006年
3 方一青;无效合同认定不适用诉讼时效之理论思辨[D];吉林大学;2010年
4 管洪博;论无效合同的诉讼时效制度[D];吉林大学;2010年
本文编号:1990741
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/1990741.html