论著作权集体管理组织权利滥用的司法救济

发布时间：2018-06-18 09:53

本文选题：著作权集体管理组织 + 垄断　；参考：《湘潭大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：本应为著作权人和广大使用人的作品许可交易提供服务的我国著作权集体管理组织，由于受到《著作权集体管理条例》以及行政主管部门的“特殊保护”而逐渐形成市场垄断地位，并滥用其权利。严重侵害了著作权人和使用人的利益。面对著作权集体管理组织的权利滥用，现有的行政救济方式根本起不到规制垄断的作用。而我国目前有关著作权集体管理组织的研究多停留在集体管理组织的性质、价值或管理模式选择等问题上。对权利滥用的问题虽有引起大家的关注，却很少有专门提出完善权利救济的观点。但现在的当务之急恰恰应该是想如何对权益已经受到侵害或即将受侵害的著作权人及使用人进行有效的救济。司法救济作为权利救济中最直接、有效的救济方式，，虽在我国著作权法和著作权集体管理条例中有部分规定，但几乎都停留在权利表面上，十分简陋和粗糙。无法进行实践操作。著作权集体管理组织与著作权人签订的入会协议、与使用人签订的许可使用协议都属于民事合同，但合同内容中有关著作权人的收益分配以及使用人的付费标准等都是著作权集体管理组织一方事先制定好的，而一类作品在我国对应的著作权集体管理组织只有一家，也就是说权利人别无选择。那么权利人应该可以引用我国《合同法》第54条规定：主张合同显失公平而向人民法院请求变更或撤销，或者从《信托法》、《反垄断法》中寻找司法救济的依据。本文运用法解释学方法、比较研究方法来论证著作权集体管理组织的权利滥用司法救济问题。从已有的司法裁判以及现在的法律框架中找出司法救济的支撑点，比较分析德国的行政管理模式和美国的市场竞争模式，从行政到市场，从立法到司法看权利人的救济措施给我国带来的启发。最终提出完善我国著作权集体管理组织权利滥用的司法救济的具体建议。
[Abstract]:China's copyright collective management organization, which is supposed to serve the copyright owners and the licensing transactions of the vast majority of the users, has gradually formed a market monopoly and abused its rights because of the "special protection of copyright collective management regulations and the special protection of the administrative department." In the face of the abuse of the rights of the collective management organization of copyright, the existing administrative remedy methods do not play the role of regulating the monopoly. At present, the research on the collective management organization of copyright in our country is mostly on the nature of the collective management organization, the choice of the value or the mode of management. However, there are few points of view to improve the remedy of rights, but the urgent task now is to make effective relief to the copyright owners and the users who have been infringed or infringed. Judicial relief is the most direct and effective remedy in the remedy of rights, although it is in the copyright law and copyright in our country. There are some provisions in the collective management regulations, but almost all remain on the surface of rights. They are very crude and crude.
The agreement signed by the collective management organization of copyright and the copyright owner and the licensing agreement signed with the user belong to the civil contract, but the distribution of the income of the copyright owner and the pay standard of the user are all set up first by the collective management organization of copyright, and a class of works correspond to our country. There is only one group of copyright collective management organizations, that is, the right holder has no choice. Then the right person should be able to quote the fifty-fourth provisions of the contract law of China: to claim that the contract is not fair and to ask for change or revocation to the people's court, or to find the basis for judicial relief from the trust law and the antitrust law.
This article carries out the method of Hermeneutics and compares the methods of comparative study to demonstrate the problem of judicial relief for the rights abused by the collective management organization of copyright. From the existing judicial referees and the present legal framework, we find out the supporting points of judicial relief, and compare the model of administrative management in Germany and the market competition mode of the United States, from the administration to the market, and from the establishment of the market. The law to the judiciary to see the inspiration of the relief measures of the right people to our country, and finally put forward the concrete suggestions to improve the judicial relief of the abuse of the rights of the collective management organization of the copyright of our country.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.41

【参考文献】