当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 合同法论文 >

合同解除权行使效果研究

发布时间:2018-07-03 16:49

  本文选题:溯及力 + 恢复原状 ; 参考:《华东政法大学》2013年硕士论文


【摘要】:我国《合同法》关于合同解除权行使效果并没有详细规定,仅进行了原则约定,解除是否具有溯及力、如何进行恢复原状以及解除合同后进行损害赔偿的范围等问题都仍然存在法律解释的空间。本文从我国合同立法历史沿革入手,分析各个阶段对解除权制度的取舍,以及立法例的不足,,在此基础上对需要填补的问题逐一进行论述。文章论述部分分为三部分,合同解除溯及力、恢复原状义务的具体化和合同解除后损害赔偿的请求。 第一章“问题的提出”,作为文章的首部分,对解除权的范畴进行界定,明确对解除权的理解。同时解释了对合同解除与合同终止的区别,对我国合同法中的解除权适用范围进行限定,即排出合同终止情形的适用。 第二章“我国解除权效果演变与规范考察”,这一章从我国合同立法历史沿革角度出发,包括经济合同法、涉外经济合同法和技术合同法三足鼎立的时期,到统一合同立法的过程中,解除权效果如何发生变化的,以及这种变化对所带来的结果。在进行历史沿革中,辅之以比较法的研究,对国际条约中解除权效果内容进行比较,得出我国目前合同解除权效果的组成,作为之后讨论的基础。 第三章“合同解除性质——溯及力问题”,合同解除溯及力作为解除权效果制度的基础问题,对其他内容都有重要影响。本章首先从大陆法国家解除权效果制度的演进为比较法材料,日本、德国和我国台湾地区“民法”解除权制度的发展,特别是德国新旧债法的比较。合同解除权溯及力有直接说、折中说和间接效果说三种主流观点。哪种观点在法理和实践上更加符合我国立法目的,是本章论述的重点内容。 第四章“恢复原状义务性质辨析”,恢复原状、采取其他补救措施是合同法明确规定的解除权效果之一,但是具体如何恢复、不能恢复时怎样处理,法条中并没有具体说明。本章以前文中对德国新旧债法比较研究为基础,借鉴德国新债法中恢复原状内容,分成第97条恢复原状的内涵、返还原物的性质、价值补偿义务和用益的返还几个部分进行论述。 最后一章为合同解除后的损害赔偿请求。首先是合同解除后损害赔偿请求权的性质,对此有选择主义、信赖利益和履行利益三种学说。另一个重要问题就是,损害赔偿的范围,如何划分返还原物和损害赔偿的范围,避免重复补偿。可得利益是否属于合同解除后赔偿范围仍然具有争议。同时,对在协议解除、预期违约和不可抗力具体情况中如何界定赔偿的范围进行论述。
[Abstract]:China's contract Law has no detailed provisions on the effect of the exercise of the right to rescind the contract, but has only agreed in principle whether the rescission has retroactive effect. There is still room for legal interpretation on how to restore the original condition and the scope of damages after the termination of the contract. Starting with the history of contract legislation in our country, this paper analyzes the choice and choice of the system of rescission right in each stage, and the insufficiency of the legislation, and on this basis discusses the problems that need to be filled one by one. The article is divided into three parts, the retroactive effect of the contract, the concretization of the restitution obligation and the request for damages after the termination of the contract. As the first part of the article, the first part defines the category of the right of rescission and makes clear the understanding of the right of rescission. At the same time, it explains the difference between the termination of the contract and the termination of the contract, and limits the scope of application of the right of rescission in the contract law of our country, that is, excluding the application of the circumstances of termination of the contract. The second chapter, "Evolution and normative investigation of the effect of rescission right in China", starts from the historical evolution of China's contract legislation, including the period of economic contract law, foreign economic contract law and technical contract law. In the process of uniform contract legislation, how does the effect of rescission change, and the result of this change. In the course of historical evolution, the author compares the contents of the effect of rescission in international treaties with the comparative study, and draws the composition of the effect of rescission of contract in our country, which is the basis of later discussion. The third chapter is "the nature of contract rescission-retroactive effect", the retroactive effect of contract rescission, as the basic issue of the system of rescission effect, has important influence on other contents. This chapter firstly evolves from the system of relieving power in mainland France to the material of comparative law, and the development of the system of rescission of civil law in Japan, Germany and Taiwan, especially the comparison of new and old German law of debt. The retroactive effect of contract rescission has three main views: direct theory, compromise theory and indirect effect theory. Which point of view is more in line with the legislative purpose of our country in legal theory and practice, is the key content of this chapter. The fourth chapter "the nature of restitution obligations", restitution, take other remedial measures is one of the clear provisions of the contract law, one of the effects of the right of rescission, but the specific recovery, how to deal with the failure to restore, the law does not specify the provisions. On the basis of the comparative study of the old and new German debt methods, this chapter draws lessons from the contents of the new German debt law and divides it into the connotation of article 97, and the nature of the return of the original. The obligation of value compensation and the return of usages are discussed in several parts. The last chapter is the claim for damages after the termination of the contract. The first is the nature of the claim for damages after the termination of the contract. There are three theories: selectivism, reliance interest and performance interest. Another important question is how to divide the scope of compensation for damages and how to divide the scope of return of original and damages to avoid repeated compensation. Whether the interest is within the scope of compensation after the termination of the contract is still controversial. At the same time, it discusses how to define the scope of compensation in the circumstances of agreement dissolution, expected breach of contract and force majeure.
【学位授予单位】:华东政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D923.6

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前4条

1 张驰;违约责任条款地位论[J];法学;2004年12期

2 卢谌;杜景林;;论合同解除的学理及现代规制——以国际统一法和民族国家为视角[J];法学;2006年04期

3 李克武;论可得利益及其违约赔偿——兼评《合同法》第113条[J];河南省政法管理干部学院学报;2002年06期

4 陆青;;合同解除有无溯及力之争有待休矣——以意大利法为视角的再思考[J];河南省政法管理干部学院学报;2010年03期



本文编号:2094300

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/2094300.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户c4a6b***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com