论纯粹经济损失的法律救济

发布时间：2018-08-22 16:21

【摘要】：侵权法上最为重要的工作是：明确哪些利益受它的保护,以及这些利益受到何种程度的保护。2010年实施的《侵权责任法》规定“民事权益”为它的保护对象。学理上,“民事权益”包括了纯粹经济利益,那么纯粹经济利益是否受到《侵权责任法》的保护,其保护程度与绝对权是否相同则是司法实践不得不面对的问题。按照文理解释,它保护所有的民事权益并且保护程度相同,而这将导致侵权责任的“扩大化”,反而不利于对人们权益的保护。对此,本文开篇以请求纯粹经济损失赔偿案件为切入点,调查法院对此类案件的态度以及司法实践对《侵权责任法》第2条、第6条、第7条等的适用情况,找出法院适用难点并且介绍学术界的不同观点找出争论的焦点,引出论文的主题：纯粹经济利益是否受到《侵权责任法》的保护,以及受到何种程度保护的问题。然后从法律政策、特别立法、比较法、新法对旧法的继承、法律解释、实践效果六个角度对《侵权责任法》保护范围进行分析得出本文的结论：应该对《侵权责任法》第6条第1款进行客观目的解释,解释路径可以效仿德国法模式,而关于过错推定责任、无过错责任、公平责任的各个具体规范,绝大多数的保护范围应解释为仅包括绝对权,甚至只有特定的绝对权。最后对《侵权责任法》第2条、第6条、第7条等条款提出司法解释相关建议,并指出应该将特别立法中涉及的纯粹经济损失规定进行系统的整理并给予适当的分类,明确其对纯粹经济损失的救济与否,并将之与纯粹经济利益保护的一般性规定相协调,以之来指导我们的司法实践的建议。
[Abstract]:The most important work in tort law is to make clear which interests are protected and to what extent they are protected. The Tort liability Law implemented in 2010 stipulates "civil rights and interests" as its object of protection. Theoretically, "civil rights and interests" include pure economic interests, so whether pure economic interests are protected by Tort liability Law, whether the degree of protection is the same as absolute right is a problem that judicial practice has to face. According to literary interpretation, it protects all civil rights and interests to the same extent, and this will lead to the "expansion" of tort liability, which is not conducive to the protection of people's rights and interests. In view of this, this paper starts with the case of asking for compensation for pure economic loss, and investigates the court's attitude towards such cases and the application of judicial practice to articles 2, 6 and 7 of the Tort liability Law, etc. To find out the difficulties of court application and introduce the different viewpoints of academic circles to find out the focus of the debate, lead to the theme of the thesis: whether pure economic interests are protected by tort liability law, and to what extent they are protected. Then from the legal policy, the special legislation, the comparative law, the new law to the old law inheritance, the legal interpretation, The conclusion of this paper is as follows: the article 6, paragraph 1, should be interpreted objectively, and the way of interpretation can follow the model of German law. As for the specific norms of the presumption of fault liability, no-fault liability and fair liability, the vast majority of the scope of protection should be interpreted as including only absolute rights, or even specific absolute rights. Finally, the article 2, article 6 and article 7 of the Tort liability Law put forward the relevant suggestions of judicial interpretation, and pointed out that the provisions of pure economic loss involved in the special legislation should be systematically organized and properly classified. It is clear whether its relief to pure economic loss or not, and to coordinate with the general provisions of the protection of pure economic interests, in order to guide our judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D923

【参考文献】