私法领域内动态体系的发展
发布时间：2018-08-27 08:43
【摘要】：私法的发展面临着新的困境:一方面,传统私法因其僵硬的概念和僵化的体系,难以满足社会的需要;另一方面,诉诸正义、衡平、理性和良知等观念的主张赋予法官过大的自由裁决权,从而突破了法律的限制。为此,本文提倡使用"动态构造+弹性规范"即探究法律规范本身及其构成要素的方法来克服这一难题:在损害赔偿法领域,应当放弃试图确立绝对效力的法律原则的解决方案,承认责任源于多个要素或动态力量的相互作用即特殊结合和强度,如果某要素强度特殊,它自身可能足以使责任成立;在合同法领域,尤其是在合同效力的认定上,应当将合同诚信原则、当事人利益的保护、不公平获利情况、当事人的过错行为纳入考虑;在不当得利领域,需要考虑的是:得利的观念和错误、胁迫、欺诈及其他相似力量的相互作用。因此,动态体系论可能会增加法官的职责,但以弹性方式所作的决定可以为制定法提供更为牢固的支持。
[Abstract]:The development of private law is facing a new dilemma: on the one hand, traditional private law is difficult to meet the needs of the society because of its rigid concept and rigid system; on the other hand, it can not meet the needs of the society. The idea of reason and conscience gives judges too much discretion to break through the limitation of law. Therefore, this paper advocates the use of "dynamic construction elastic norms", that is, to explore the legal norms themselves and their constituent elements to overcome this problem: in the field of compensation for damage law, Solutions that attempt to establish legal principles of absolute validity should be abandoned, recognizing that liability originates from the interaction of multiple elements or dynamic forces, namely, special combination and intensity, and that, if a particular element is of a particular intensity, it may itself be sufficient to establish liability; In the field of contract law, especially in the determination of the validity of the contract, the principles of good faith in the contract, the protection of the interests of the parties, the situation of unfair profit, the fault of the parties, and the improper enrichment should be taken into account. Take into account: the idea and error of enrichment, the interaction of coercion, fraud, and other similar forces. Therefore, dynamic system theory may increase the duties of judges, but decisions made in a flexible manner can provide stronger support for law making.
【作者单位】： 北京航空航天大学人文与社会科学高等研究院;北京航空航天大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金一般项目“侵权责任法实施中的疑难问题研究”(项目编号:12BFX083)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D913
本文编号：2206718
[Abstract]:The development of private law is facing a new dilemma: on the one hand, traditional private law is difficult to meet the needs of the society because of its rigid concept and rigid system; on the other hand, it can not meet the needs of the society. The idea of reason and conscience gives judges too much discretion to break through the limitation of law. Therefore, this paper advocates the use of "dynamic construction elastic norms", that is, to explore the legal norms themselves and their constituent elements to overcome this problem: in the field of compensation for damage law, Solutions that attempt to establish legal principles of absolute validity should be abandoned, recognizing that liability originates from the interaction of multiple elements or dynamic forces, namely, special combination and intensity, and that, if a particular element is of a particular intensity, it may itself be sufficient to establish liability; In the field of contract law, especially in the determination of the validity of the contract, the principles of good faith in the contract, the protection of the interests of the parties, the situation of unfair profit, the fault of the parties, and the improper enrichment should be taken into account. Take into account: the idea and error of enrichment, the interaction of coercion, fraud, and other similar forces. Therefore, dynamic system theory may increase the duties of judges, but decisions made in a flexible manner can provide stronger support for law making.
【作者单位】： 北京航空航天大学人文与社会科学高等研究院;北京航空航天大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金一般项目“侵权责任法实施中的疑难问题研究”(项目编号:12BFX083)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D913
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 胡理毅;民主政治的社会主义本质特征及其必然发展的动态体系[J];社会主义研究;2001年06期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 本报评论员 马蔚;不过度忧虑，，也不消极对待[N];工人日报;2005年
本文编号：2206718
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/2206718.html
