合同撤销与履行利益赔偿
发布时间：2018-10-13 19:25
【摘要】：针对合同撤销与履行利益赔偿可否并存,德国法上存在正反两说。对这一命题的证成,"双重效果"理论并非妥适的依据。应基于与解除合同的"相似性",在撤销合同的效果上作等同评价。针对恶意隐瞒标的物品质情形,基于两项缺陷的存在及请求权的相互影响,赔偿履行利益具有正当性。请求权基础应为合同法相关规范,谨防侵权法的渗入。在我国,评价重心并非合同存在与否,而是违约行为的发生。在规范层面,具有支持撤销合同之后赔偿履行利益的现实可能。裁判实务虽然尚未有所突破,但应对学理进行吸收借鉴。除了恶意欺诈之外,此命题可拓展适用于重大误解,但不适用于胁迫、乘人之危和显失公平的情形。
[Abstract]:There are both positive and negative theories in German law on whether contract rescission and performance benefit compensation can coexist. To prove this proposition, the theory of "double effect" is not an appropriate basis. The effect of rescission should be evaluated on the basis of the similarity between the contract and the rescission. Based on the existence of two defects and the mutual influence of the right of claim, the interests of compensation performance are justified in the case of malicious concealment of the quality of the subject matter. The basis of the right of claim should be the relevant norms of contract law and guard against the infiltration of tort law. In our country, the focus of evaluation is not the existence of contract, but the occurrence of breach of contract. At the normative level, there is a realistic possibility to support the interests of compensation and performance after rescission of the contract. Although the referee practice has not yet made a breakthrough, it should be absorbed and used for reference. In addition to malicious fraud, this proposition can be extended to major misunderstandings, but not to situations of coercion, taking advantage of danger and manifestly unfair.
【作者单位】： 南京大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目(16CFX055)
【分类号】：D923.6
[Abstract]:There are both positive and negative theories in German law on whether contract rescission and performance benefit compensation can coexist. To prove this proposition, the theory of "double effect" is not an appropriate basis. The effect of rescission should be evaluated on the basis of the similarity between the contract and the rescission. Based on the existence of two defects and the mutual influence of the right of claim, the interests of compensation performance are justified in the case of malicious concealment of the quality of the subject matter. The basis of the right of claim should be the relevant norms of contract law and guard against the infiltration of tort law. In our country, the focus of evaluation is not the existence of contract, but the occurrence of breach of contract. At the normative level, there is a realistic possibility to support the interests of compensation and performance after rescission of the contract. Although the referee practice has not yet made a breakthrough, it should be absorbed and used for reference. In addition to malicious fraud, this proposition can be extended to major misunderstandings, but not to situations of coercion, taking advantage of danger and manifestly unfair.
【作者单位】： 南京大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目(16CFX055)
【分类号】：D923.6
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 许冰梅;合同解除中的法律问题[J];中国律师;2000年08期
2 段超;简析合同解除的特点、条件和方式[J];中共青岛市委党校.青岛行政学院学报;2001年06期
3 詹恒清;合同解除制度有关问题探讨[J];中南民族学院学报(人文社会科学版);2002年S1期
4 栾志红;关于继续性合同的几个问题[J];法学论坛;2002年05期
5 王春平;;这个租用合同可解除吗[J];农村新技术;2008年11期
6 张诺诺;;合同解除的价值目标[J];黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报;2010年03期
7 孟继超;;我国合同解除制度探讨[J];哈尔滨学院学报;2011年04期
8 迟丽华;李盈霏;;合同监管过程中的主要风险及防范对策研究[J];生产力研究;2012年11期
9 刘瑞华;;关于合同解除的几个问题[J];学习与研究;1989年01期
10 王U，
本文编号：2269662
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/2269662.html
