快递损失赔偿问题研究
发布时间：2018-11-04 09:24
【摘要】：《中华人民共和国邮政法》于2009年4月24日修订通过,2009年10月1日正式施行。修订后的新邮政法最大特点是充分借鉴了世界邮政业发展的成功经验,具有鲜明的时代特征和现实操作性。其在借鉴相关法律立法经验的基础上规定“邮政企业的邮政普遍服务业务与竞争性业务应当分业经营”,并创新了损失赔偿制度,在一定程度上满足经济社会发展和人民生活的需要。但其对于快递损失赔偿以“邮政普遍服务业务范围外的邮件的损失赔偿,适用有关民事法律的规定”简单带过,难以为快递服务市场提供统一的法律指导规范。《中华人民共和国邮政法实施细则》也迟迟未能修正,因而很多问题尚未解决。新邮政法关于快递损失赔偿制度仍有一些问题需要进一步修改和完善,本文旨在对解决目前快递损失赔偿中存在的问题提出尝试性的探讨。 本文共分三个部分。第一部分探讨关于快递损失赔偿的司法立场,通过在司法实践中全额赔偿情形、赔偿合理的预期损失情形和依过错赔偿情形阐述快递损失赔偿问题的司法立场。 第二部分是关于快递损失赔偿的理论分析,明确了快递损失赔偿的涵义与性质。根据快递损失赔偿的性质提出邮政法分别与合同法以及侵权责任法的法律适用冲突,以及司法实践中,有关快递损失赔偿责任的法律适用情况。 第三部分是基于我国快递损失赔偿的现状和问题的分析提出方案和建议。建议引入商业保险制度与限额赔偿、保价制度共同构成完善的赔偿体系来充分保障用户权利。
[Abstract]:The Postal Law of the people's Republic of China was amended on April 24, 2009, and entered into force on October 1, 2009. The biggest characteristic of the revised new postal law is that it has fully used for reference the successful experience of the development of the world post industry and has distinct characteristics of the times and practical operation. On the basis of drawing lessons from relevant legal and legislative experience, it stipulates that "postal universal service business and competitive business of postal enterprises should be operated separately," and innovates the system of compensation for losses. To a certain extent, to meet the needs of economic and social development and people's life. However, the compensation for express delivery losses is simply passed by "compensation for the loss of postal materials outside the scope of the general service of postal services, applicable to the provisions of relevant civil laws," It is difficult to provide uniform legal guidance and standard for the express service market. The detailed rules for the implementation of the Postal Law of the people's Republic of China have also been delayed to amend, so many problems have not been solved. There are still some problems in the new postal law concerning the system of compensation for express delivery losses. This paper aims to put forward a tentative discussion on solving the problems existing in the compensation for express delivery losses at present. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part discusses the judicial stand on the compensation of express delivery losses, through the full compensation in judicial practice, compensation for reasonable expected loss and according to the situation of fault compensation express delivery loss compensation of the judicial stand. The second part is the theoretical analysis of express loss compensation, clear the meaning and nature of express delivery loss compensation. According to the nature of express delivery loss compensation, this paper puts forward the conflicts between postal law and contract law and tort liability law respectively, and the legal application of express delivery loss compensation liability in judicial practice. The third part is based on the analysis of the current situation and problems of express delivery compensation in China. It is suggested that the commercial insurance system and the quota compensation system should be introduced and the price insurance system should be formed to fully protect the user's rights.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D922.296
本文编号：2309411
[Abstract]:The Postal Law of the people's Republic of China was amended on April 24, 2009, and entered into force on October 1, 2009. The biggest characteristic of the revised new postal law is that it has fully used for reference the successful experience of the development of the world post industry and has distinct characteristics of the times and practical operation. On the basis of drawing lessons from relevant legal and legislative experience, it stipulates that "postal universal service business and competitive business of postal enterprises should be operated separately," and innovates the system of compensation for losses. To a certain extent, to meet the needs of economic and social development and people's life. However, the compensation for express delivery losses is simply passed by "compensation for the loss of postal materials outside the scope of the general service of postal services, applicable to the provisions of relevant civil laws," It is difficult to provide uniform legal guidance and standard for the express service market. The detailed rules for the implementation of the Postal Law of the people's Republic of China have also been delayed to amend, so many problems have not been solved. There are still some problems in the new postal law concerning the system of compensation for express delivery losses. This paper aims to put forward a tentative discussion on solving the problems existing in the compensation for express delivery losses at present. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part discusses the judicial stand on the compensation of express delivery losses, through the full compensation in judicial practice, compensation for reasonable expected loss and according to the situation of fault compensation express delivery loss compensation of the judicial stand. The second part is the theoretical analysis of express loss compensation, clear the meaning and nature of express delivery loss compensation. According to the nature of express delivery loss compensation, this paper puts forward the conflicts between postal law and contract law and tort liability law respectively, and the legal application of express delivery loss compensation liability in judicial practice. The third part is based on the analysis of the current situation and problems of express delivery compensation in China. It is suggested that the commercial insurance system and the quota compensation system should be introduced and the price insurance system should be formed to fully protect the user's rights.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D922.296
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吕斌;;新《邮政法》或致物流业洗牌[J];法人杂志;2009年06期
2 胡明;符敬青;;议快递业中的保价条款[J];法制与社会;2011年29期
3 李彬;;快递行业法律纠纷的救济[J];科技创业月刊;2011年06期
4 陈昶;罗懿;;运输合同中保价条款的效力及其排除适用的条件[J];人民司法;2008年24期
5 周永健;;快递包裹丢失案的法律适用分析[J];中国市场;2008年23期
6 张耕,邓宏光;限制性损害赔偿制度初探[J];现代法学;2002年02期
7 吕西萍;邮件损失赔偿问题研究[J];邮政研究;2002年05期
8 王利明;对《合同法》格式条款规定的评析[J];政法论坛;1999年06期
9 刘晓夏;;快递延误造成损失应如何确定赔偿[J];中国审判;2010年12期
10 杨立新;;确定快递服务丢失货物赔偿责任的三个问题[J];中国审判;2010年12期
，本文编号：2309411
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/2309411.html
