从St Albans vs.ICL等案论IT合同限制责任条款
发布时间：2018-11-21 15:51
【摘要】：限制责任条款是合同战场中双方当事人利益冲突的焦点,这种现象反映在软件服务合同(简称IT合同)中亦是如此。对于限制责任条款,最为关键的是条款解释的处理,常见的是"不利解释"原则。但是,由于IT合同中软件本身的特殊性,原有的"不利解释"原则是否需要某些调整以应对新对象,还有应如何进行调整,以及如何保证其调整不会打乱整个合同条款解释的内在逻辑体系。对上述问题的回答或许可以从St Albans vs.ICL等IT合同案中关于限制责任条款的诠释,以及对英国合同法条款解释原理的回溯中帮助我们进一步加深了解和学习,为以后中国相关实践活动献智献策。
[Abstract]:Limitation liability clause is the focus of the conflict of interest between the parties in the battlefield of contract, which is also reflected in the software service contract (IT contract). The most important thing to limit liability clause is the treatment of clause interpretation, and the principle of unfavorable interpretation is common. However, due to the particularity of the software itself in the IT contract, whether the original "unfavorable interpretation" principle needs some adjustment to deal with the new object, and how to adjust it, And how to ensure that its adjustment does not disturb the entire terms of the contract interpretation of the internal logical system. The answers to these questions may help us further understand and learn from the interpretation of the restrictive liability clause in the IT contract case such as St Albans vs.ICL and the retrospect of the principles of interpretation of the terms of contract law in the United Kingdom. To provide wisdom and advice for related practical activities in China.
【作者单位】： 西北大学法学院;
【分类号】：D913
[Abstract]:Limitation liability clause is the focus of the conflict of interest between the parties in the battlefield of contract, which is also reflected in the software service contract (IT contract). The most important thing to limit liability clause is the treatment of clause interpretation, and the principle of unfavorable interpretation is common. However, due to the particularity of the software itself in the IT contract, whether the original "unfavorable interpretation" principle needs some adjustment to deal with the new object, and how to adjust it, And how to ensure that its adjustment does not disturb the entire terms of the contract interpretation of the internal logical system. The answers to these questions may help us further understand and learn from the interpretation of the restrictive liability clause in the IT contract case such as St Albans vs.ICL and the retrospect of the principles of interpretation of the terms of contract law in the United Kingdom. To provide wisdom and advice for related practical activities in China.
【作者单位】： 西北大学法学院;
【分类号】：D913
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 周玉萍;;试论计算机软件著作权的法律保护[J];重庆电子工程职业学院学报;2009年05期
2 郭学梅;;计算机软件专利性研究[J];河南机电高等专科学校学报;2009年04期
3 毕星波;;计算机软件的知识产权保护模式研究[J];金卡工程(经济与法);2009年06期
4 薛艳丽;;从“9.11”理赔谈保险合同的“不利解释”原则[J];金融理论与实践;2008年10期
5 谷爱平;;合同解释规则的适用次序初探——兼析《合同法》第125条[J];内蒙古农业大学学报(社会科学版);2006年03期
6 高建军,王一s，
本文编号：2347428
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/2347428.html
