情势变迁与不可抗力之辨异

发布时间：2018-11-27 14:44

【摘要】：我国法学界不少人认为，情势变迁与不可抗力是一回事，只是称谓不同。这是一个误解。情势变迁与不可抗力确有相似之处。它们都是指出现了来自外界的影响合同履行的重大障碍情形。并且这种障碍是不能合理预见和不能克服的；两者均为体现公正、公平原则的法律救济制度。但是两者仍然存在一些重要区别，即，两者所指的障碍程度不同，，调整结果不同，发生作用的途径不同，争讼性质不同，事由范围不同。由于认识上的差错，新的合同法对情势变迁与不可抗力未能作出区分。立法机关应通过立法解释，将情势变迁和不可抗力分别作出规定，区别两者的适用情形和相应责任。
[Abstract]:Many people in the field of law in our country think that the change of situation and force majeure is the same thing, but the appellation is different. This is a misunderstanding. The vicissitudes of circumstances and force majeure do have similarities. They all refer to the emergence of major obstacles from the outside world affecting the performance of the contract. And this obstacle can not be reasonably foreseen and can not be overcome; both of them are the legal relief system which embodies the principle of justice and fairness. However, there are still some important differences between them, that is, they refer to different degrees of obstacles, different adjustment results, different paths of action, different nature of litigation and different scope of cause. Due to cognitive errors, the new contract law does not distinguish between situational change and force majeure. The legislature should interpret the situation and force majeure by means of legislation, and distinguish the application and responsibility of the two.
【作者单位】：江苏理工大学人文学院法律系
【分类号】：D913

【共引文献】