论合同解除后违约金条款的适用

发布时间：2018-12-24 09:22

【摘要】：合同解除后，非违约方是否能根据原合同主张适用违约金条款，我国《合同法》并没有给出明显的答案，这也导致了理论界和实务界对该问题存在较大的争议。事实上，在司法实践中，也确实存在就完全相同性质案件作出截然不同判决的现象，即有的案件判令适用合同违约金条款，有的则判令不适用。本文首先从两则法院经典案例入手，分析我国司法实践和理论界对该问题的不同观点及立法缺陷，，并在比较两大法系国家和国际公约有关违约金制度的基础上认为，除法律有特别规定外，一般情形下，合同解除后都能适用违约金条款。最后，本文对我国合同解除后违约金条款适用的法律制度完善提出一些建议。
[Abstract]:After the termination of the contract, whether the non-defaulting party can apply the liquidated damages clause according to the original contract, China's contract Law has not given an obvious answer, which also led to the theoretical and practical circles of this issue has a greater controversy. In fact, in judicial practice, there is a very different kind of judgment in cases of exactly the same nature, that is, some cases order the application of contract liquidated damages, and others do not. This article begins with two classic court cases, analyzes the different viewpoints and legislative defects of the judicial practice and theoretical circle of our country on this issue, and on the basis of comparing the two legal system countries and the international conventions about the system of penalty for breach of contract. Unless the law has special provisions, generally, after the termination of the contract can be applied to the liquidated damages clause. Finally, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the perfection of the legal system applicable to the liquidated damages clause after the termination of the contract in our country.
【学位授予单位】：上海交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D923.6

【参考文献】