合同解除制度若干问题之实务分析

发布时间：2019-03-15 06:44

【摘要】：社会经济往来愈趋紧密、交易愈趋频繁,合同法对市场经济保障作用愈显重要。一个成熟的市场经济在很大程度上是以合同能否得到及时圆满的履行、因合同而生争议是否被及时公正地解决作为标志。在合同所生争议能否被及时、公正解决这方面,合同解除制度就发挥着重要的作用。就合同解除制度,审判实务中处理意见分歧较大的三个问题为,通知是否为合同解除的必经程序、违约金能否与合同解除并存,以及合同解除后主张赔偿损害赔偿的范围。本文从合同解除制度的基本原理、合同法针对性条文本身出发,着重就合同解除程序中通知方式及合同解除后法律后果在司法实践中所遇到问题分三章作分析、说明,各章均以审判实践中的案例为引。第一章以《合同法》第九十六条为基点,简述合同解除的通知方式及其效力,进而对未经通知直接以诉讼方式要求解除合同的利弊分析。第二章以《合同法》第九十七条为基点,简述合同解除的效力、合同解除的法律后果形态,结合违约金的性质,对于审判实务中解除合同后能否一并主张违约金的问题作出判断。第三章以《合同法》明确规定赔偿损失为合同解除的法律后果之一为基点,对合同解除的损失赔偿是违约责任的一种表现方式,还是其他民事责任的表现方式作解析,确定合同解除赔偿损失的性质后,再探讨可得利益能否得以支持的问题。本文采用理论与实务相结合的方式,配合具体案例分析,对合同解除制度中,审判实践中出现的处理意见分歧较大的三类问题作剖析,冀求有些许突破。
[Abstract]:The closer the social and economic exchanges become, the more frequent the transactions are, and the more important the contract law plays in the protection of the market economy. A mature market economy, to a large extent, is marked by whether the contract can be fulfilled in a timely and successful manner and whether the disputes arising from the contract are resolved in a timely and fair manner. The contract termination system plays an important role in whether the disputes arising from the contract can be resolved in time and justly. As to the system of rescission of contract, the three problems dealing with different opinions in trial practice are whether notice is the necessary procedure for termination of contract, whether the penalty for breach of contract coexists with the termination of contract, and the scope of claiming compensation for damages after the termination of contract. Starting from the basic principle of the contract discharge system and the specific provisions of the contract Law, this paper focuses on the analysis of the notice mode in the procedure of termination of the contract and the problems encountered in the judicial practice of the legal consequences after the termination of the contract, and explains the problems encountered in the judicial practice. Each chapter takes the case in the trial practice as the citation. The first chapter, based on Article 96 of contract Law, gives a brief account of the notice mode and effect of termination of contract, and then analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of demanding termination of contract directly without notice. The second chapter, based on Article 97 of the contract Law, gives a brief account of the validity of the termination of the contract, the legal consequences of the termination of the contract, and the nature of the damages for breach of contract. To judge whether or not to claim damages for breach of contract together after the termination of contract in trial practice. The third chapter is based on the clear stipulation in the contract Law that compensation for loss is one of the legal consequences of termination of contract, and analyzes whether the compensation for loss released from contract is an expression of liability for breach of contract or a manifestation of other forms of civil liability. After determining the nature of the indemnification of the contract, the question of whether the available benefits can be supported is discussed. With the combination of theory and practice and with the analysis of specific cases, this paper analyzes the three kinds of problems in the system of termination of contract, which appear in the practice of trial, and tries to make some breakthroughs in dealing with the big differences of opinion.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.6

【共引文献】