论离婚协议中约定赠与的司法判定

发布时间：2018-05-17 16:45

本文选题：离婚协议 + 赠与约定　；参考：《西南政法大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：我国当前的婚姻观念相较于上世纪已经发生了深刻变化,在夫妻离婚过程中,为了方便、快捷地达到解除婚姻关系、脱离婚姻“泥沼”的目的,大部分夫妻会选择到民政部门登记离婚,签订一份离婚协议。本来简单的以解除婚姻关系为核心内容的离婚协议,往往会附加一些其他条款,使得离婚协议的内容丰富起来,除单纯的解除人身关系外,增加了财产关系的内容,比如在离婚协议中约定赠与。在司法实践中,因离婚协议中约定赠与而发生纠纷的案件越来越多。对该类纠纷目前尚无直接的法律规定可循,各地人民法院对此类纠纷的裁判观点也不一致,相似案件存在相左判决。而法学理论界围绕离婚协议中约定赠与的性质和赠与人是否享有任意撤销权也是仁智各见。对此,本文以夫妻在婚姻登记机关协议离婚时,双方所签订的离婚协议中约定赠与的情形进行研究讨论,采用实证分析和理论分析相结合的方法,通过梳理实务案例,结合婚姻、合同、物权、诉讼法学理论知识,探析构建“离婚协议中约定赠与”纠纷的司法判定规则。除开引言外,正文共分为五个部分,约2万字。第一部分问题的提出。介绍“王某与王光林赠与合同纠纷案”的案件情况,引出对“离婚协议中约定赠与”纠纷的疑问。通过检索中国裁判文书网,收集类似案例,制成案例分析表(见附件一),归纳出“离婚协议中约定赠与”纠纷的四种具体情形:(1)一方个人财产,协议离婚时约定赠与另一方;(2)一方个人财产,协议离婚时约定赠与第三人;(3)夫妻共有财产,协议离婚时约定将一方所有的份额赠与另一方;(4)夫妻共有财产,协议离婚时约定赠与第三人。第二部分“离婚协议”中的赠与条款与赠与合同混淆。通过对离婚协议和赠与合同的界定,梳理关于“离婚协议”中的赠与条款性质的观点,分析实务中将赠与条款和赠与合同混淆的情况。提出“离婚协议中约定赠与”纠纷中的“离婚协议”,包涵离婚协议和赠与合同或赠与意思表示两个部分的内容的观点。第三部分法律适用争议。探讨在“离婚协议中约定赠与”纠纷是适用“合同法”抑或“婚姻法”,赠与人可否行使任意撤销权?通过对相关观点地梳理,提出四点质疑,倾向于该类纠纷适用《合同法》,赠与人享有任意撤销权。第四部分程序法律问题。分析“离婚协议中约定赠与”纠纷的程序法律问题——案由适用混乱和当事人的认定。司法实务中所适用的案由有撤销权纠纷、合同纠纷、婚姻家庭纠纷、离婚后财产纠纷、物权确认纠纷、析产纠纷以及赠与合同纠纷等。当涉及受赠人为第三人的情形时,易引发当事人的不适格。第五部分司法判定规则。构建“离婚协议中约定赠与”纠纷的司法判定规则:除“夫妻共有财产,协议离婚时约定将一方所有的份额赠与另一方”的情形适用夫妻共同财产分割规则外,其余三种情形均应适用赠与合同规则,赠与人享有任意撤销权。
[Abstract]:The current marriage concept in our country has undergone profound changes in the last century. In the process of divorce, most couples will choose to register for divorce and sign a divorce agreement for the purpose of relieving marriage relations and getting divorced from the "mire". The divorce agreement of the content of the heart often adds some other terms, which makes the content of the divorce agreement rich. In addition to the purely personal relationship, the content of the property relationship is increased, such as the agreement in the divorce agreement. In judicial practice, more and more cases are dissension due to the agreement of divorce in the divorce agreement. There are no direct legal provisions to follow at present, and the opinions of the people's courts in various places are also inconsistent, and the similar cases have a left judgment. The nature of the agreement in the divorce agreement and the right of free revocation to the giver are also true. In the case of divorce, the divorce agreement signed in the divorce agreement is discussed and discussed. By combining empirical analysis and theoretical analysis, by combing the practical cases, combining the theoretical knowledge of marriage, contract, real right and litigation law, this paper analyzes the judicial decision rules of establishing "the agreement grant in divorce agreement". In addition, the text is divided into five parts, about 2 thousand words. The first part of the question is put forward. The case of the case of a contract dispute between Wang and Wang Guanglin is introduced. The question of the dispute in the "agreement on divorce in the divorce agreement" is introduced. By retrieving the Chinese referee's net, collecting similar cases and making a case analysis table (see Annex I). "The divorce agreement agreement grant" four specific cases of the dispute: (1) one party's personal property, the agreement divorced when the agreement is given to the other party; (2) one party's personal property, the agreement divorce agreed to third people; (3) the husband and wife shared property, the agreement divorce agreed to give the share of the other party to the other party; (4) the husband and wife share property, the agreement of divorce when the divorce Third people agree to give away. The second part of the "divorce agreement" is confused with the gift contract. Through the definition of the divorce agreement and the gift contract, it combs the view of the nature of the gift clause in the "divorce agreement", analyzes the situation of mixing the gift clause and the gift contract in the practice. The "divorce agreement" in the dispute contains the views of two parts of the divorce agreement and the gift contract or the meaning of the gift. The third part of the law applies to the dispute. The discussion of the dispute in the "agreement on divorce" in the "divorce agreement" is the application of "contract law" or "marriage law", and can the donor exercise any revocation right? Through the relevant views Point to the point of combing, put forward four questions, inclined to the application of the "contract law", the donor enjoy the right to arbitrarily revoke. The fourth part of the procedural legal issues. Analysis of the procedural legal issues of the "agreement in divorce agreement" disputes - the case applicable to confusion and the parties' identification. Contract disputes, marital family disputes, property disputes after divorce, property identification disputes, labor analysis disputes and grant contract disputes. When the third person is involved, it is easy to cause the discomfort of the parties. The fifth part of the judicial decision rules. In the case of common property, when the agreement has been agreed to give all the share of one party to the other party when the agreement is divorced, the other three situations shall apply to the rules of the grant contract, and the donor enjoys the right to revoke arbitrarily.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.6

【相似文献】