婚内侵权类型化研究
发布时间:2018-05-31 01:30
本文选题:婚内侵权 + 家庭暴力 ; 参考:《西南政法大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:近些年,婚内侵权这一课题在婚姻法领域属于比较热的题目。研究婚内侵权的学者较多,一开始,大家都在讨论婚内侵权制度是否需要建立起来。肯定说与否定说各执一词,针锋相对。但是到了目前,肯定说已占据优势,否定说已然势微。但建立婚内侵权制度的关键问题是,婚内侵权中的“权”的外延有多大,以及在形形色色的权利中,它们的侵权构成是否会有不同。笔者针对这些问题,对婚内侵权作类型化研究,以便于婚内侵权制度在具体的司法实践能被很好地操作,及助于对婚内侵权制度的完善。 本文共分为四部分。第一部分,婚内侵权概述。主要是对婚内侵权的概念作一个全新的解读,然后对婚内侵权的性质进行分析,与一般侵权的性质作对比分析,以进一步地了解和掌握婚内侵权。 第二部分,婚内侵权之立法现状。基于目前我国并无婚内侵权的法律规定,笔者先介绍世界各地其它国家的相关法律规定,,再对我国与此相关的法律作详细阐述,对比分析,找出我国的立法差距。 第三部分,婚内侵权相关理论及分析。这部分主要介绍婚内侵权制度是否要建立的两种观点。一为否定观点,一为肯定观点。通过对两种观点的详细介绍分析,得出尽量合乎现代社会需要的观点。笔者认为应该建立婚内侵权制度。 第四部分,婚内侵权类型化研析。此部分为本文的核心内容。笔者从婚内权利入手,先将婚内权利作分类,然后根据各类权利,对其侵权构成、侵权形态,以及其比较特殊的地方做深入分析。借此,推动婚内侵权制度理论的深入研究,以及为以后的立法及司法实践提供可操作性的理论依据。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the subject of marital tort is a hot topic in the field of marriage law. There are many scholars studying marital tort. At the beginning, everyone is discussing whether it is necessary to establish the marital tort system. Affirmation and negation are adamant and tit-for-tat. But at present, the affirmation has already occupied the superiority, the negation says already the potential is weak. However, the key problem in establishing the marital tort system is how much the extension of the "right" in the marital tort is, and whether their tort constitution will be different in all kinds of rights. Aiming at these problems, the author makes a study on the classification of marital tort, so that the marital tort system can be well operated in the specific judicial practice, and help to improve the marital tort system. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part is an overview of marital tort. It mainly makes a new interpretation of the concept of marital tort, then analyzes the nature of marital tort, and makes a comparative analysis with the general nature of tort, in order to further understand and master the marital tort. The second part, the legislative status of marital tort. Based on the present legal provisions of non-marital tort in China, the author first introduces the relevant laws and regulations of other countries around the world, and then makes a detailed elaboration of the relevant laws of our country, compares and analyzes to find out the legislative gap in our country. The third part, the theory and analysis of marital tort. This part mainly introduces the two views whether the marital tort system should be established. One is a negative point of view, the other is a positive point of view. Through the detailed introduction and analysis of the two viewpoints, a viewpoint that meets the needs of the modern society as far as possible is obtained. The author believes that the system of marital tort should be established. The fourth part is about the classification of marital tort. This part is the core of this article. The author starts with the marital rights, classifies the marital rights first, and then, according to various rights, makes an in-depth analysis of the constitution, the form and the special place of the infringement. In order to promote the further study of the theory of marital tort system, and to provide an operational theoretical basis for future legislation and judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D923;D923.9
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 何懿甫;配偶权与婚内强奸[J];法律适用(国家法官学院学报);2001年04期
2 樊林;生育权探析[J];法学;2000年09期
3 龙春松;评婚姻法的离婚损害赔偿制度[J];广西广播电视大学学报;2001年04期
4 王春平;曲航黎;;婚内损害赔偿可行性的探讨[J];工会论坛(山东省工会管理干部学院学报);2007年01期
5 刘淑媛;;重构侵害配偶权的权利救济制度[J];宁夏社会科学;2006年04期
6 冀祥德;域外婚内强奸法之发展及其启示[J];环球法律评论;2005年04期
7 焦少林;;论建立夫妻间侵权责任制度[J];现代法学;2006年05期
8 俞瑾;;论我国婚内侵权损害赔偿制度的构建[J];西南政法大学学报;2011年01期
9 杜江涌;婚内侵权相关问题研究[J];西南民族大学学报(人文社科版);2005年05期
10 张佩霖;民事损害赔偿中的因果关系探疑[J];政法论坛;1986年02期
本文编号:1957737
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hyflw/1957737.html