中国宪法诉讼的可能性考量

发布时间：2018-06-04 18:06

本文选题：宪法诉讼 + 可能性　；参考：《湘潭大学》2003年硕士论文

【摘要】： 本论文的内容由引言和如下四个部分组成：宪法诉讼之含义及其与相关概念的界分；宪法诉讼制度的形成及欧美模式之比较；中国宪法诉讼的可能性；中国宪法诉讼的制约因素。长期以来，我国宪法的根本法地位，只是体现在作为制定法律的依据方面，除此之外，主要发挥的是宣示性的政治功能，宪法所确认的公民基本权利，相当一部分因未被部门法具体化而无法真正实现，究其原因，主要是由于我国缺乏相应的宪法诉讼制度，以至于违宪的法律和行为得不到及时的纠正和制裁，公民的宪法权利缺乏实现的程序性保障。笔者认为，法治的本质是宪治，宪治的核心是宪法诉讼，而宪法诉讼又是权利制约权力的最具根本意义的机制，公民的基本权利离不开宪法诉讼的保护。因此，研究宪法诉讼在我国的可能性，具有十分重大的理论和现实意义：一是可以丰富和完善我国现有的诉讼制度，，为宪法诉讼制度的最终确立，提供有益的理论依据；二是揭开宪法“高不可攀”的神秘面纱，彰显宪法本来所具有的区别于一般法律、法规的特殊法律功能及其最高法律价值；三是为公民基本权利的实现，构筑最终性的、最有效的程序屏障；四是可以为进一步深化司法体制改革指明方向，增强人们对司法体制改革的信心，培育法律信仰乃至宪法信仰。本文力图从对宪法诉讼与相关概念的对比分析入手，通过对我国政治、经济、法律等方面的思考，认为中国宪法诉讼的明天不是梦。
[Abstract]:The content of this paper is composed of introduction and four parts as follows: the meaning of constitutional litigation and its division with related concepts, the formation of constitutional litigation system and the comparison of European and American models, the possibility of constitutional litigation in China; The restrictive factors of China's constitutional litigation. For a long time, the status of the fundamental law of China's constitution has been reflected only as the basis for the formulation of laws. In addition, in addition to this, it has mainly played a declarative political function. Many of the fundamental rights recognized by the Constitution cannot be truly realized because they have not been concretized by the departmental law. The main reason for this is the lack of a corresponding constitutional litigation system in our country. So that the unconstitutional laws and actions can not be corrected and punished promptly, and the citizens' constitutional rights lack the procedural guarantee to realize. The author believes that the essence of the rule of law is constitutional governance, and the core of constitutional governance is constitutional litigation. Constitutional litigation is the most fundamental mechanism which restricts the power of rights, and the basic rights of citizens can not be separated from the protection of constitutional litigation. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to study the possibility of constitutional litigation in China: firstly, it can enrich and perfect the existing litigation system of our country, and provide beneficial theoretical basis for the final establishment of constitutional litigation system; The second is to uncover the mysterious veil of "unreachable" of the Constitution, to highlight the special legal function and the supreme legal value of the Constitution, which is different from general laws and regulations; and third, to build the ultimate character for the realization of the basic rights of citizens. The most effective procedural barrier; fourth, it can point out the direction for further deepening the reform of the judicial system and enhance people's confidence in the reform of the judicial system. This paper tries to start with the comparative analysis of constitutional litigation and related concepts, and through thinking about our country's politics, economy, law and so on, thinks that the future of Chinese constitutional litigation is not a dream.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2003
【分类号】：D921

【相似文献】