论亲权制度的立法构建

发布时间：2018-06-09 02:40

本文选题：亲权 + 监护　；参考：《大连海事大学》2008年硕士论文

【摘要】： 本文主要通过对大陆法系国家的亲权制度和英美法系国家的监护制度进行分析比较研究,并结合我国亲子关系法律制度中存在的问题,试图对我国的亲子关系立法提出合理的建议。全文分为前言、正文、结论三大部分。其中正文包括以下五个部分的内容。第一部分是亲权制度概述。追溯了亲权的制度的历史沿革,它经历了从拥有绝对权力的家父权到今天以保护教育未成年子女为目的现代亲权,亲权人从绝对父权发展为父母共同亲权,亲权的行使也从“为父的利益”发展到“为子女的利益”。通过和相似或相关制度的比较说明亲权制度的性质及特征。第二部分是亲权的内容以及与监护的比较。在借鉴国外立法的基础之上阐述了亲权的相关内容;但随着社会的发展客观情况的复杂多变前提下,本章也剖析了当前亲权内容在理论上存在的争议。第三部分是亲权的国外立法例。该部分采用比较的方法,对大陆法系各国的亲权制度进行较为详细的研究同时也对英美法系国家现存的包涵亲权内容的监护制度进行分析,总结出亲权制度和监护制度的不同之处。第四部分是阐述我国亲权制度的立法现状以及建立和完善我国亲权制度的必要性。我国现行法律中对这方面的规定存在着以下弊端:概念不清,亲权与监护不分;内容简单,过于原则、抽象化;权利义务规定极不明确,欠缺可操作性。建立亲权制度对我国有很重要的理论意义和现实的实践意义。第五部分提出了对我国建立亲权制度的立法构想。结合我国国情阐述我国亲权制度应当包涵的,内容,剖析了当前的一些侵害亲权的类型,提出建立亲权的保障体系应当包括的内容例如亲权侵犯的责任构成要件、亲权违反的责任承担方式等,并在此基础上结合监护制度的相关规定提出了建立我国亲权制度的立法构想。
[Abstract]:This paper analyzes and compares the paternity system in civil law countries and the guardianship system in Anglo-American legal system, and combines the problems existing in the legal system of parent-child relationship in China. This paper tries to put forward reasonable suggestions on the legislation of parent-child relationship in our country. The paper is divided into three parts: preface, text and conclusion. The text includes the following five parts. The first part is an overview of paternity system. Tracing back to the historical evolution of the system of parental power, it has experienced from the family and paternity with absolute power to the modern parental right, which aims to protect the education of minor children, and the parental authority develops from absolute paternity to joint parental power of parents. The exercise of parental power also develops from "the interests of the father" to "the interests of the children". The second part is about the content of parental authority and the comparison with guardianship. On the basis of drawing lessons from foreign legislation, this paper expounds the related contents of parental power, but with the development of society, the objective situation is complex and changeable. The third part is the foreign legislation of parental right. This part uses the comparative method, carries on the more detailed research to the civil law system countries' paternity system, and also carries on the analysis to the common law system countries' existing guardianship system which includes the parental right content. The fourth part is to expound the current legislative situation of the parental right system in China and the necessity of establishing and perfecting the parental right system in our country. There are the following disadvantages in the current law of our country: the concept is not clear, parental right and guardianship are not separated; the content is simple, too principle, abstract; the stipulation of right and obligation is very unclear, lack of maneuverability. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to establish the system of parental right in China. The fifth part puts forward the legislative conception of establishing the system of parental right in our country. Combined with the national conditions of our country, this paper expounds the contents of the parental right system in China, analyzes on some types of infringement of parental rights, and puts forward the contents that should be included in the establishment of the protection system of parental right, such as the constitutive elements of the responsibility of parental right infringement. On the basis of the related regulations of guardianship system, the author puts forward the legislative conception of establishing the parental right system in our country.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：D923

【引证文献】