论擅自处分夫妻共同财产行为的效力
发布时间：2018-12-16 00:39
【摘要】：随着夫妻共同财产的不断增加,个人和家庭参与市场活动也越来越多。在夫妻处分共有财产时会涉及到多方关系,对夫妻内部财产和第三人的合法权益造成影响,也会影响整个社会交易秩序,进而影响社会的和谐。在现实生活中,擅自处分夫妻共同财产的现象已经屡见不鲜,如何平衡夫妻一方的财产利益和第三人的财产利益也尤其重要。在擅自处分夫妻共同财产行为的效力上适用物权法上的规定,但是物权法设计共有制度的目的与婚姻法不同。物权法可以让民事主体选择共同拥有物还是自己拥有,以实现对物价值最大利用。但是,婚姻家庭法属于身份法,与其他的民事法律相比,身份属性很强烈。作为可以取得所有权的善意取得制度,其目的是平衡权利人与善意第三人之间利益,维护交易安全。当其用于婚姻法中决定处分行为效力时,会过于维护第三人的权益忽视夫妻间的权益。此外,在分析夫妻处分共同财产行为的效力时,我国现行法律和司法解释的规定还模糊不具体:平等的处理权规定不具体;日常家事的范围没有明确界定;擅自处分夫妻共同财产的性质也有争论,那它的效力又是怎样;现行法律倾向于保护善意第三人,如何保护夫妻非处分方的利益?《婚姻法司法解释(三)》增加了两项救济制度:夫妻婚内分割共同财产制度和处分共有房屋后的离婚损害赔偿制度。新增设的这两种制度都在保护夫妻财产利益上有所进步,但总体保护力度还不够,存在许多不足之处。本文以分析擅自处分夫妻共同财产行为的效力为基础来探讨这些问题,并总结现行法律对夫妻财产利益的保护存在的缺陷,提出一些建议。
[Abstract]:With the increasing of husband and wife's common property, individuals and families participate in market activities more and more. When the couple dispose of the common property, it will involve various relationships, which will have an impact on the couple's internal property and the legitimate rights and interests of the third party, will also affect the whole social transaction order, and then affect the social harmony. In real life, it is common to dispose of the joint property of husband and wife without authorization, how to balance the property interests of one spouse and the property interests of the third party is especially important. The law of real right is applicable to the validity of unauthorized disposition of joint property of husband and wife, but the purpose of designing a common system in real right law is different from that of marriage law. The law of real right allows the civil subject to choose whether to own the joint property or to own it, so as to realize the maximum use of the property value. However, the law of marriage and family belongs to the law of identity, compared with other civil laws, the identity attribute is very strong. As a bona fide acquisition system, the purpose of the system is to balance the interests between the obligee and the bona fide third party and to maintain the transaction security. When it is used to determine the validity of disciplinary action in marriage law, it will protect the rights and interests of third party and ignore the rights and interests of husband and wife. In addition, in the analysis of the effectiveness of the disposition of joint property, the current legal and judicial interpretation of the provisions are vague and not specific: the equal right to deal with the provisions are not specific, the scope of daily household is not clearly defined; The nature of unauthorized disposition of joint property of husband and wife is also controversial, then what is its effectiveness; Existing laws tend to protect bona fide third parties, How to protect the interests of the non-disciplinary parties? the Judicial interpretation of Marriage Law (3) adds two relief systems: the system of splitting the common property within the marriage and the system of compensation for divorce damage after the disposition of the common house. The two new systems have made progress in protecting the property interests of husband and wife, but the overall protection is not enough, and there are many deficiencies. Based on the analysis of the effectiveness of unauthorized disposition of joint property of husband and wife, this paper discusses these problems, summarizes the shortcomings of the current law in protecting the property interests of husband and wife, and puts forward some suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.9
本文编号：2381558
[Abstract]:With the increasing of husband and wife's common property, individuals and families participate in market activities more and more. When the couple dispose of the common property, it will involve various relationships, which will have an impact on the couple's internal property and the legitimate rights and interests of the third party, will also affect the whole social transaction order, and then affect the social harmony. In real life, it is common to dispose of the joint property of husband and wife without authorization, how to balance the property interests of one spouse and the property interests of the third party is especially important. The law of real right is applicable to the validity of unauthorized disposition of joint property of husband and wife, but the purpose of designing a common system in real right law is different from that of marriage law. The law of real right allows the civil subject to choose whether to own the joint property or to own it, so as to realize the maximum use of the property value. However, the law of marriage and family belongs to the law of identity, compared with other civil laws, the identity attribute is very strong. As a bona fide acquisition system, the purpose of the system is to balance the interests between the obligee and the bona fide third party and to maintain the transaction security. When it is used to determine the validity of disciplinary action in marriage law, it will protect the rights and interests of third party and ignore the rights and interests of husband and wife. In addition, in the analysis of the effectiveness of the disposition of joint property, the current legal and judicial interpretation of the provisions are vague and not specific: the equal right to deal with the provisions are not specific, the scope of daily household is not clearly defined; The nature of unauthorized disposition of joint property of husband and wife is also controversial, then what is its effectiveness; Existing laws tend to protect bona fide third parties, How to protect the interests of the non-disciplinary parties? the Judicial interpretation of Marriage Law (3) adds two relief systems: the system of splitting the common property within the marriage and the system of compensation for divorce damage after the disposition of the common house. The two new systems have made progress in protecting the property interests of husband and wife, but the overall protection is not enough, and there are many deficiencies. Based on the analysis of the effectiveness of unauthorized disposition of joint property of husband and wife, this paper discusses these problems, summarizes the shortcomings of the current law in protecting the property interests of husband and wife, and puts forward some suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.9
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吕春娟;;我国非常夫妻财产制之建构[J];浙江工商大学学报;2015年01期
2 杨晋玲;;平衡抑或失衡——对《婚姻法司法解释(三)》第11条的评析及解决途径的选择[J];云南大学学报(法学版);2014年03期
3 陈苇;姜大伟;;论婚姻家庭住房权的优先保护[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2013年04期
4 刘贵祥;;论无权处分和善意取得的冲突和协调——以私卖夫妻共有房屋时买受人的保护为中心[J];法学家;2011年05期
5 辛正郁;;夫妻共有房屋单方处分中的法律适用问题[J];人民司法;2011年19期
6 孙若军;;家庭共同生活居住所需房屋不适用善意取得制度研究[J];政治与法律;2011年04期
7 熊玉梅;;论交易安全视野下的夫妻日常家事代理权[J];法学杂志;2011年03期
8 吴楠楠;;夫妻一方擅自处分共有财产问题的法律探析[J];商业文化(学术版);2009年05期
9 张付;;不动产善意取得与物权法公示公信原则[J];法制与社会;2008年35期
10 刘巧丽;;论共有人擅自转让共有财产的法律效果——以夫妻一方擅自转让不动产为例[J];法制与社会;2007年09期
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 金健峰;;第三人能否取得夫妻一方擅自处理的共同财产[N];江苏经济报;2006年
2 曲华军;;论我国的善意取得制度[N];人民法院报;2005年
3 张素军;宋大运;;“夫妻共同财产”的外延[N];人民法院报;2002年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 裴桦;夫妻共同财产制研究[D];吉林大学;2008年
，本文编号：2381558
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hyflw/2381558.html
