论离婚诉讼与法官职权的有机契合
发布时间：2018-12-29 08:09
【摘要】：随着社会经济的不断进步与发展,婚姻结构的变化,我国离婚诉讼案件数量越来越多,离婚诉讼作为民事诉讼的一种,也是人身诉讼的典型。这种特殊的人身诉讼在诉讼过程中需要特殊去对待处理。所以笔者正文第一章首先从离婚案件本身所具有的特点及对诉讼程序有着特殊需求的特点的角度对离婚诉讼的基本特征进行了分析。由于离婚案件本身具有社会公益性、牵连性、调解前置性、隐私性和特殊心理性的特征,与一般的民事诉讼存在着巨大的差别。因此离婚诉讼在其适用程序上需要法官依职权调查取证、考虑双方未提出的事实、对诉讼程序进行的控制和法官的释明权的特点。正文第二章笔者从合法性理论、协同主义理论和诉讼价值理论角度分析了离婚诉讼与法官职权契合的合理性。但是我国离婚诉讼的现状很不乐观,在我国当前的审判实践中,往往将离婚诉讼这种特殊的家事诉讼按照普通的财产诉讼处理,并未对离婚诉讼的特殊性予以关注,再加上当事人主义的提倡,使离婚诉讼这种特殊的需要加强法官职权干预的诉讼与提倡当事人主导诉讼程序的当事人主义诉讼模式之间的矛盾更加突出。针对目前出现的问题,笔者认为应该通过积极建立离婚诉讼制度,设立婚姻诉讼案件审判庭,并加强法官队伍建设,配备离婚诉讼专职法官等方法去解决。
[Abstract]:With the development of social economy and the change of marriage structure, there are more and more divorce cases in our country. As a kind of civil action, divorce lawsuit is also a typical case of personal action. This kind of special personal lawsuit needs special treatment in the process of litigation. In the first chapter, the author analyzes the basic characteristics of divorce proceedings from the point of view of the characteristics of divorce cases and the special needs of the proceedings. Because the divorce case itself has the characteristics of social welfare, implicature, mediation preposition, privacy and special psychology, there is a huge difference between divorce cases and general civil litigation. Therefore, divorce proceedings need judges to investigate and collect evidence ex officio, to consider the facts not presented by both parties, to control the proceedings and to explain the characteristics of judges. In the second chapter, the author analyzes the rationality of the agreement between divorce litigation and judges' powers from the perspectives of legality theory, synergetic theory and litigation value theory. However, the status quo of divorce proceedings in our country is not optimistic. In our country's current trial practice, divorce litigation is often handled in accordance with ordinary property litigation, without paying attention to the particularity of divorce proceedings. In addition, the advocacy of litigant doctrine makes the contradiction between the lawsuit of divorce, which needs to strengthen the intervention of judge's power, and the litigant litigation mode, which advocates the litigant to lead the proceedings, is more prominent. In view of the existing problems, the author thinks that we should set up the divorce lawsuit system, set up the matrimonial lawsuit case trial court, strengthen the construction of the judge team, and equip the divorce lawsuit full-time judge to solve the problem.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D923.9;D925.1;D926.2
本文编号：2394561
[Abstract]:With the development of social economy and the change of marriage structure, there are more and more divorce cases in our country. As a kind of civil action, divorce lawsuit is also a typical case of personal action. This kind of special personal lawsuit needs special treatment in the process of litigation. In the first chapter, the author analyzes the basic characteristics of divorce proceedings from the point of view of the characteristics of divorce cases and the special needs of the proceedings. Because the divorce case itself has the characteristics of social welfare, implicature, mediation preposition, privacy and special psychology, there is a huge difference between divorce cases and general civil litigation. Therefore, divorce proceedings need judges to investigate and collect evidence ex officio, to consider the facts not presented by both parties, to control the proceedings and to explain the characteristics of judges. In the second chapter, the author analyzes the rationality of the agreement between divorce litigation and judges' powers from the perspectives of legality theory, synergetic theory and litigation value theory. However, the status quo of divorce proceedings in our country is not optimistic. In our country's current trial practice, divorce litigation is often handled in accordance with ordinary property litigation, without paying attention to the particularity of divorce proceedings. In addition, the advocacy of litigant doctrine makes the contradiction between the lawsuit of divorce, which needs to strengthen the intervention of judge's power, and the litigant litigation mode, which advocates the litigant to lead the proceedings, is more prominent. In view of the existing problems, the author thinks that we should set up the divorce lawsuit system, set up the matrimonial lawsuit case trial court, strengthen the construction of the judge team, and equip the divorce lawsuit full-time judge to solve the problem.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D923.9;D925.1;D926.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郭美松;;设立具有中国特色人事诉讼程序之构想[J];重庆大学学报(社会科学版);2009年05期
2 何文燕;刘波;;我国当事人陈述制度之检讨与重构——兼评民诉法《修改建议稿(第三稿)及立法理由》第十七章[J];法律科学(西北政法学院学报);2007年02期
3 庄淑珍，董天夫;我国代表人诉讼制度与美国集团诉讼制度的比较研究[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);1996年02期
4 蔡虹,刘加良;弱势群体的民事诉讼法保护论纲[J];河南大学学报(社会科学版);2004年06期
5 何家弘;论司法证明的目的和标准——兼论司法证明的基本概念和范畴[J];法学研究;2001年06期
6 顾培东;论我国民事权利司法保护的疏失[J];法学研究;2002年06期
7 张卫平;起诉条件与实体判决要件[J];法学研究;2004年06期
8 唐力;对话与沟通:民事诉讼构造之法理分析[J];法学研究;2005年01期
9 马文艳;刍议ADR机制在我国的建立[J];律师世界;2003年11期
10 张晓茹;;论我国海事强制令制度之完善[J];人民司法;2006年04期
，本文编号：2394561
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hyflw/2394561.html
