夫妻一方处分夫妻共有股权问题研究
[Abstract]:With the development of economy and society, the amount of common property of husband and wife is increasing day by day, and the investment mode of joint property of husband and wife is more and more extensive. At the same time, the share transfer dispute in the property dispute between husband and wife has been increasing year by year. During the marriage relationship, there are common cases of unauthorized disposition of the joint ownership of the husband and wife by one of the spouses. Similar cases, due to the legal literacy of the judge, Different legal cognition and value tendency lead to the opposite judgment result, which impair the judicial authority and influence the realization of the legal guidance function. This paper includes three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The preface describes the causes of this study, the current research situation at home and abroad, and the research ideas, purposes and significance of this paper. The text includes four chapters. The first chapter is the summary of the joint ownership of husband and wife. It is divided into three parts: the first part is to analyze the basic meaning of the joint ownership of husband and wife, the second part is to analyze the form and manifestation of the joint ownership of husband and wife. The third part is the analysis of the nature of the joint ownership of husband and wife. In order to have a clear understanding of the husband and wife share ownership. The second chapter is the analysis of the judicial practice of one-party disposition of the joint ownership of husband and wife. Specifically divided into two parts: the first part from the case of judicial practice, analysis of the focus of litigation and the causes of different judgments in the same case; the second part of the focus of the dispute, analysis of the application of the law, and put forward the author's point of view. The third chapter identifies the nature of a couple's disposition of the joint ownership of the husband and wife, and analyzes and demonstrates the relief mode of the above behavior in the judicial practice. According to the specific circumstances, there are two kinds of cases: the first is that only one spouse appears on the register of shareholders and the business registration, which constitutes no right to dispose, and generally relief the third person in good faith through the system of bona fide acquisition. And through the "Marriage Law" Article 47 to the non-shareholder spouse relief; The second situation is that both husband and wife appear on the register of shareholders and industrial and commercial registration. In the fourth chapter, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to deal with the possible disputes between husband and wife, and puts forward some methods to prevent disputes from the perspective of perfecting the system construction. Specific include: from the system clear that the ownership is the joint property of husband and wife, set up a joint registration system and set up a public notice period, set up a common property management system of husband and wife; In order to relax the access authority of shareholders' spouses and strengthen the education of law popularization, we should improve the system of stock registration and transfer, strengthen the publicity of stock rights and the protection of the right to know. The conclusion shows the author's attitude that the joint ownership of husband and wife belongs to the joint property of husband and wife, and according to the appearance of the right of joint ownership of husband and wife, In order to realize the unification of judicial decision, we can classify and remedy the joint ownership behavior of husband and wife from the two angles of unauthorized disposition and apparent agency, unify the value orientation, prevent and solve from the system perfection, so as to realize the unification of judicial decision. The promotion of judicial credibility.
【学位授予单位】:大连海事大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D923.9
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈艳美;;“高校处分权”问题之法学探析[J];泰山学院学报;2005年02期
2 祝建兵;;高校处分权的双重属性及正确行使[J];理论界;2008年03期
3 吴回生;;法律视域中的学校处分权探讨[J];教育导刊;2011年06期
4 曲卫彬;小议“财产处分权”[J];山东法学;1997年04期
5 关颐龄;完善房地产抵贷物处分和管理的对策[J];南方金融;2000年05期
6 刘雁兵;论处分权[J];山东行政学院山东省经济管理干部学院学报;2002年01期
7 杨志民,曾德生;普通高校教育处分法律问题探讨[J];江西社会科学;2003年09期
8 李志清;戴涛;严瑾;;高校处分权法治化初探[J];思想·理论·教育;2004年09期
9 刘稳丰;;论高校处分学生的正当程序[J];思想·理论·教育;2004年09期
10 方益权;;论学生处分的程序设计(上)[J];中小学管理;2005年06期
相关会议论文 前4条
1 李科明;;落实行政监察处分权的思考[A];新时期反腐倡廉研究文集[C];2007年
2 卫丹;;在处分权与审判权动态平衡视野下的撤诉干预[A];全国法院系统第二十二届学术讨论会论文集[C];2011年
3 蒋光辉;;无权处分合同效力的法经济学分析[A];2008年度(第六届)中国法经济学论坛论文集(上)[C];2008年
4 王兴;;论高校学生的行政救济途径[A];河北省第四届社会科学学术年会论文专辑[C];2009年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 通讯员 张剑 刘慕鑫 南开大学周恩来政府学院教授 沈亚平;大学生受处分不再一背终身的反思[N];中国教育报;2010年
2 苏子川;“处分听证”:学生维权的救济途径[N];光明日报;2005年
3 中央纪委案件审理室 董芳;公务员被判刑后的处分适用如何把握[N];中国纪检监察报;2013年
4 曾献文;谁来监管高校的“处分权”?[N];检察日报;2003年
5 雨霖;己有之物被他人处分能追回吗?[N];工人日报;2014年
6 ;高校处分权:在合法和侵权之间[N];检察日报;2003年
7 凌飞;人力资本产权的核心在于运动[N];社会科学报;2001年
8 彭跃进 刘宗亮 江西省鄱阳县人民法院;夫妻一方擅自处分共同共有房屋的效力[N];人民法院报;2014年
9 张贵才;改变“监督疲软”现状需增设检察处分权[N];民主与法制时报;2007年
10 钱俊华;房产是否必须过户才能行使处分权[N];人民法院报;2004年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 包运成;未成年人财产处分规则比较研究[D];湖南师范大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 杜霞;高校学生处分权法律规制的研究[D];山东大学;2011年
2 王晓晨;论诈骗罪中被害人的处分意识[D];中国社会科学院研究生院;2015年
3 郭华;诈骗罪的处分问题研究[D];西南大学;2015年
4 杨金伟;论无权处分合同的法律效力[D];兰州大学;2015年
5 徐惠颖;论夫妻一方擅自处分共有房屋相关利益保护[D];大连海事大学;2015年
6 王崇;海商法视野下船长紧急处分职能行使问题研究[D];大连海事大学;2015年
7 周庆庆;夫妻一方处分共有房屋的法律问题研究[D];华东政法大学;2015年
8 陈为;论实质性违法建筑上的民事权利[D];华东政法大学;2015年
9 邓春波;论《合同法》第51条关于无权处分合同的效力[D];西南政法大学;2014年
10 张宸尉;行政法视野下的高校处分权研究[D];贵州民族大学;2016年
,本文编号:2418404
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hyflw/2418404.html