农村违法建筑的法律地位分析

发布时间：2018-01-04 19:19

本文关键词：农村违法建筑的法律地位分析　出处：《扬州大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：农村违法建筑是伴随着城市违章建筑而出现的,在相关政策法规的约束下,城市违法建筑的逐渐减少,农村的违法建筑却在逐步上升。随着农村土地流转新政策的出台,农村宅基地改革的试点的进行,针对农村违法建筑的法律地位研究必然有着切实的实践意义和法律意义。如何看待理性的对农村违法建筑便成为亟需解决的问题。本文主要就农村违法建筑能否取得通过事实行为取得所有权,能否被继受取得,其于公法领域中能否取得拆迁补偿、于私法领域中能否取得相邻权,以及如何于上述法律领域如何定位的问题。就农村违法建筑并不能视为都没有所有权,程序性违法建筑可以以“合法建造”为基础,在程序补正后享有受限制的所有权,在此之前为所有权待定。而实质性违法建筑并不能自事实行为而取得所有权,但其拥有者可对其建筑享有占有。同时,违法建筑于继受取得中的合同买卖、赠与、继承等方面的关系需要理清。在公法领域,农村程序性违法建筑在补正程序后能够得到合法建筑所应有的补偿,但未经补正程序的程序性违法建筑以及实质性违法建筑只能在拆迁中享有建筑构件材料以及建筑物内财产的补偿。相对于私法中的保护制度而言,农村违法建筑都应当享有一定的权利,而一定的区分和限制也是必然的。
[Abstract]:Illegal buildings in rural areas are accompanied by urban illegal buildings and appear, under the constraints of relevant policies and regulations, the number of illegal buildings in cities is gradually reduced. With the introduction of the new policy of rural land circulation, the rural homestead reform has been carried out on a pilot basis. The study on the legal status of illegal buildings in rural areas is bound to have practical and legal significance. How to treat the rational illegal buildings in rural areas is an urgent problem to be solved. This paper mainly discusses whether illegal buildings in rural areas can be solved. To acquire ownership through an act of fact. Whether it can be acquired, whether it can obtain the compensation for demolition in the field of public law, and whether it can obtain the adjacent right in the field of private law. As well as how to position in the above legal field. On the rural illegal building can not be regarded as no ownership, procedural illegal building can be based on "legal construction". After the amendment of the procedure, the owner has the limited ownership, pending the ownership... And the substantial illegal building cannot acquire ownership from the factual act, but the owner may have possession of the building... at the same time. In the field of public law, in the field of public law, the rural procedural illegal building can get the compensation due to the legal building after the correction procedure. However, the procedural illegal building and the substantial illegal building without correction procedure can only enjoy the compensation of the building component materials and the property in the building in the demolition, compared with the protection system in the private law. Illegal buildings in rural areas should enjoy certain rights, and certain distinctions and restrictions are inevitable.
【学位授予单位】：扬州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D922.297

【相似文献】